METODOLOGIA INTERATIVA PARA O ENSINO DE DISCIPLINAS JURÍDICAS: TEORIA E PRÁTICA

Konstantin Polovchenko

Resumen


Objetivo: O artigo é dedicado aos problemas atuais da influência dos métodos interativos de ensino de disciplinas jurídicas na qualidade do ensino jurídico superior.

Métodos: Com base na comparação e síntese da experiência pedagógica nacional e estrangeira, o autor propõe os métodos interativos mais eficazes para o ensino de disciplinas jurídicas.

Resultados: É dada atenção especial ao método de modelagem, que, segundo o autor, é um dos métodos inovadores mais eficazes no ensino. No entanto, o conceito de modelagem é abordado de maneira ambígua na ciência nacional e estrangeira.

Conclusão: Ao investigar as questões de melhoria do processo de palestras jurídicas, o autor conclui que o uso de métodos interativos proporciona uma atualização qualitativa do conteúdo do ensino e garante a universalidade, eficácia e qualidade da formação de advogados profissionais. Sugestões são feitas sobre as perspectivas de aplicação e desenvolvimento de métodos interativos de ensino de disciplinas jurídicas.


Palabras clave


métodos interativos; vantagem; disciplinas jurídicas; pensamento crítico; abordagens científicas; modelagem; palestra interativa; inovação metodológica

Texto completo:

PDF (Português (Brasil))

Referencias


Alford, W. P., Glendon, M. A., & Sheridan, L. A. (2023). Legal education. The Encyclopedia Britannica. https://www.britannica.com/topic/legal-education (access date: May 5, 2021).

Avdeeva, A. N. (2020). Principles of construction and conduct interactive lecture. Bulletin of Science and Education, 8-1(86), 107-109.

Bekh, I., & Pelech, Y. (2020). The genesis-modelling method in the educational process. Journal of History, Culture and the Arts, 9(2), 90-105. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v9i2.2614

Bond, M., Marin, V. I., Dolch, K., Redenlier, S., & Zawacki-Richter, O. (2018). Digital transformation in German higher education: Student and faculty perceptions and use of digital media. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education, 15, 48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41239-018-0130-1

European Commission. (2020). Digital Education Action Plan (2021-2027). Resetting education and training for the digital age. European Education Area. https://education.ec.europa.eu/focus-topics/digital-education/action-plan (access date: May 5, 2021).

Gunawan, G., Harjono, A., Nisyah, M., Kusdiastuti, M., & Herayanti, L. (2020). Improving students' problem-solving skills using inquiry learning model combined with advance organizer. International Journal of Instruction, 13(4), 427-442. https://doi.org/10.29333/iji.2020.13427a

Hawlitschek, A., & Joeckel, S. (2017). Increasing the effectiveness of digital educational games: The effects of a learning instruction on students' learning, motivation and cognitive load. Computers in Human Behavior, 72, 79-86. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.01.040

Ignatkina, A. (2018). Frame modeling method in teaching and learning legal terminology. Studies in Logic, Grammar and Rhetoric, 53(66), 81-104. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/slgr-2018-0005

Law, K. M. Y., Geng, S., & Li, T. (2019). Student enrollment, motivation, and learning performance in a blended learning environment: The mediating effects of social, teaching, and cognitive presence. Computers & Education, 136, 1-12. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2019.02.021

Lin, M.-H., Chen, H.-C., & Liu, K.-S. (2017). A study of the effects of digital learning on learning motivation and learning outcome. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics Science and Technology Education, 13(7), 3553-3564. https://doi.org/10.12973/eurasia.2017.00744a

Luengvilai, C., Wongta, N., & Yodmongkol, P. (2021). Design and application of a legal game to promote factual investigation knowledge for undergraduate law students. Pertanika Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 29(1), 707-731. https://doi.org/10.47836/pjssh.29.1.39

Mutalieva, A. Sh., & Akhtanova, S. K. (2020). Pedagogy of the twenty-first century: Innovative teaching methods. Universum: Psychology and Education, 3(69), 19-23.

Neminska, R. (2018). Didactic modeling in teaching students pedagogues. International Journal of Scientific Research and Management, 6(06), 383-388. https://doi.org/10.18535/ijsrm/v6i6.el03

Novković Cvetković, B., & Stanojevic, D. (2017). Educational needs of teachers for introduction and application of innovative models in educational work to improve teaching. International Journal of Cognitive Research in Science, Engineering and Education, 5(1), 49-56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/IJCRSEE1701049N

Polovchenko, K. (2022). The constitutional court as a subject of the political process. Politics and Policy, 50(3), 622-630. https://doi.org/10.1111/polp.12469

Polovchenko, K. (2023). Influence of the constitutional court on the transformation of vital national interests of Bosnia and Herzegovina. European Politics and Society, 24(3), 410-420. https://doi.org/10.1080/23745118.2022.2044600

Prudnikova, T. A., & Poskakalova, T. A. (2019). Foreign experience of applying information and communication technologies to increase learning motivation. Contemporary Foreign Psychology, 8(2), 67-82. https://doi.org/10.17759/jmfp.2019080207

Sadovnikova, G. D. (2017). Peculiarities of teaching the disciplines of state-legal cycle with the use of interactive methodology. Actual problems of Russian law, 2(75), 37-44. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2017.75.2.037-044

Sergeeva, O. N., & Andrienko, E. V. (2016). Interpretation of different aspects of education in Great Britain. Vestnik of Novosibirsk State Pedagogical University, 6(3), 18-29. http://dx.doi.org/10.15293/2226-3365.1603.02

Sergis, S., Sampson, D. G., & Pelliccione, L. (2018). Investigating the impact of flipped classroom on students' learning experiences: A self-determination theory approach. Computers in Human Behavior, 78, 368-378. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.08.011

Shutikova, M., & Beshenkov, S. (2020). Modern digital educational environment and media education - Platforms for education system transformation. Media Education, 60(4), 736-744.

Tulchinsky, G. (2017). Digital transformation of education: Challenges for higher education. Philosophical Sciences, 6, 121-136.

Turan, U., Fidan, Y., & Yildiran, C. (2019). Critical thinking as a qualified decision-making tool. Journal of History, Culture and Art, 8(4), 1-18. https://doi.org/10.7596/taksad.v8i4.2316

Vinnichenko, O., & Gladun, E. (2018). Legal education in the BRICS countries in the context of globalization: A comparative analysis. BRICS Law Journal, 5(3), 4-39. https://doi.org/10.21684/2412-2343-2018-5-3-4-39

Zhadan, V. N. (2018). Experience of interactive and innovative forms and methods of training in teaching legal disciplines. Baltic Humanitarian Journal, 7(3(24)), 200-209.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v1i77.6659

Enlaces refback

  • No hay ningún enlace refback.


Bookmark and Share


Revista Jurídica e-ISSN: 2316-753X

Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181

Licença Creative Commons

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.