ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND THE RECONFIGURATION OF KNOWLEDGE: ALGORITHMIC EROTIC COGNITION

Resumen

ABSTRACT

This paper develops an integrated theoretical framework addressing Artificial Intelligence (AI) as both ontological force and engine of socioeconomic transformation, articulating three interrelated axes: (i) the reconfiguration of epistemic desire and cognitive autonomy through what we term Algorithmic Erotic Cognition (AEC). Drawing on Peircean semiotics, Stiegler's philosophy of technics, Simondon's theory of individuation, Bateson's ecology of mind, and Floridi's informational ontology, we argue that contemporary AI technologies displace the deferred pleasure of discovery toward instantaneous gratification, thereby reshaping cognitive autonomy and authorship while producing homogeneous contexts that nullify difference and everything resistant to computation. Empirical evidence from neuroscientific studies (MIT, 2025) demonstrates the accumulation of cognitive debt following repeated interactions with Large Language Models (LLMs), characterized by reduced neural connectivity in networks associated with metacognition and imagination. In dialogue with Hui's technodiversity framework and decolonial perspectives (Crawford, Parsons, Couldry & Mejías), we propose that AI co-constitutes social temporality and reconfigures epistemic desire, demanding holistic, multisectoral, and technodiverse approaches that honor epistemological pluralism. Within educational contexts, we synthesize evidence on the performance-learning paradox, highlighting risks of thought homogenization alongside opportunities for interface design fostering epistemic autonomy through what we term friction design. We conclude with a radical hermeneutic provocation: reading the possibility of "co-creation" with AI rather than human replacement, evoking AI as pharmakon (poison or remedy, depending on dosage), as Serres's "technical angel" (mediator), and in Stiegler's ambivalent framing, as daimon (mediator between worlds, simultaneously savior and destructive). The dilemma lies not in expelling digital machines but in reinscribing them within culture's symbolic circuit, converting algorithmic support into abductive catalyst rather than substitute, and reinscribing the human as symbolic participant rather than mere functional user.

Research: The research has the following primary aims: Theorize AI's reconfiguration of epistemic desire through the concept of Algorithmic Erotic Cognition (AEC), analyzing how generative AI systems reshape the pleasure of knowing, cognitive autonomy, and knowledge production. Map how AI and its infrastructures reconfigure the production and redistribution of value, power, and knowledge across global socioeconomic systems. Identify specific human capacities requiring development in the AI era and propose interventions—including critical algorithmic literacy and friction design—to mitigate cognitive debt while fostering genuine human-machine complementarit

Methodology: This study adopts a hybrid methodology that integrates philosophical inquiry, semiotic analysis, critical theory, and empirical grounding from contemporary neuroscience. The methodological design mobilizes four complementary axes: Philosophical–Hermeneutic Analysis Drawing from Peircean semiotics, Stiegler’s philosophy of technics, Simondon’s theory of individuation, Bateson’s ecology of mind, and Hui’s cosmotechnics, we employ a hermeneutic approach to interpret AI as both an ontological and epistemic force. This axis enables the conceptualization of Algorithmic Erotic Cognition (AEC) as a dispositif that reconfigures epistemic desire and symbolic mediation. Critical Socio-Technical Diagnosis The analysis incorporates materials from platform governance, algorithmic governmentality, surveillance capitalism, and technopolitical studies (Zuboff; Rouvroy & Berns). We examine AI systems—particularly generative LLMs—as infrastructures of behavioral modulation, focusing on erotic affordances, age-verification vulnerabilities, and commercialization of intimacy. This includes a normative assessment of regulatory gaps in the AI Act, FTC investigations, and neurotechnology ethics frameworks (UNESCO 2024). Empirical Anchoring Through Neuroscientific and Cognitive Evidence The paper integrates findings from recent neuroscientific research, especially the MIT (2025) report on cognitive debt, studies on recursive model collapse (Shumailov et al., Nature 2024), and cognitive/affective impacts of AI companions. These data provide empirical support for the thesis that AI-mediated cognition can reshape metacognition, imagination, and abductive agency. Critical-Prototypical Design Inquiry (“Friction Design”) Finally, the study adopts a speculative–experimental design lens to envision prototypes such as the Friction Engine, Epistemic Mirror, and Quantum Prompt Lab. These prototypes serve as methodological tools to test pedagogical and cognitive interventions that reintroduce uncertainty, delay, and abductive reasoning in human–AI interaction. Across these four axes, the methodology does not aim to eliminate uncertainty but to preserve it as a productive epistemic condition, making friction, hesitation, and ambiguity methodological principles rather than obstacles.

Results: The research yields four primary findings: Identification of Algorithmic Erotic Cognition (AEC) as a New Epistemic Regime AEC is shown to displace the deferred pleasure of discovery toward instantaneous algorithmic gratification, compressing the interval where epistemic desire traditionally resides. This transformation reconfigures cognition from a process of abductive exploration into a form of predictive consumption. Empirical Corroboration of Cognitive Debt and Epistemic Homogenization Neuroscientific evidence supports the hypothesis that recurrent delegation of reasoning tasks to LLMs leads to detectable reductions in neural connectivity associated with metacognition, originality, and imagination. Additionally, studies on model collapse confirm that recursive synthetic data cycles create informational environments characterized by semantic homogenization and declining epistemic diversity.Demonstration of Affective, Somatic, and Semiotic Transformations The results suggest that cognitive offloading to AI is not merely informational but affective-corporeal: interfaces that provide immediate certainties weaken the sensory–motor–affective circuits involved in curiosity and discovery. This corroborates Bateson’s ecological model and Damásio’s theory of somatic markers. AI thus reshapes subjectivity not only through logic but through the body of cognition. Identification of Governance Failures and Socio-Political Risks Analysis of OpenAI’s erotic-content policy, age-verification vulnerabilities, and the monetization of intimacy reveals systemic governance failures with implications for mental health, child safety, discrimination, and democratic participation. Current regulatory frameworks insufficiently address the socio-affective dimensions of AI eroticization and its integration within surveillance capitalism. Overall, the results confirm that AI systems modulate desire, reduce abductive agency, and risk reorganizing subjectivity around predictive, optimized, and homogenized patterns of cognition.

Contributions: This study offers theoretical, methodological, empirical, and normative contributions that advance contemporary debates on AI, cognition, and technopolitics.

Theoretical Contributions: Introduces and formalizes the concept of Algorithmic Erotic Cognition (AEC) as a framework for understanding how AI reconfigures epistemic desire, authorship, and the erotic structure of knowing. Bridges philosophy of technics (Stiegler, Simondon, Hui), semiotics (Peirce, Ibri), and cognitive ecology (Bateson, Damásio), articulating AI as an ontological force that co-constitutes temporality, memory, and social individuation.Develops a philosophical critique of algorithmic governmentality, linking erotic affordances to broader dynamics of hyper-optimization, symbolic misery, and cognitive proletarianization.

Methodological Contributions: Proposes a friction-based design paradigm, offering conceptual and prototypical tools to reintroduce delay, uncertainty, ambiguity, and abductive richness into human–AI interaction. Establishes a hybrid research methodology that merges hermeneutic analysis, semiotic diagnosis, neuroscience, and speculative design.

Empirical Contributions:Synthesizes neuroscientific evidence of cognitive debt and demonstrates its resonance with semiotic, phenomenological, and affective theories. Provides a structured account of the socio-technical risks associated with AI eroticization, including cognitive impacts, vulnerability of minors, behavioral modulation, and erosion of epistemic diversity.

Normative and Policy Contributions: Reframes educational and ethical AI literacy around abduction, imagination, and epistemic autonomy, rather than mere technical competency.

Civilizational Contribution: By articulating knowledge as an erotic, relational, and ecological process, the study contributes to a broader cultural reorientation—one that treats AI not as replacement but as pharmakon: a technical mediator capable of either eroding or deepening human flourishing depending on design, governance, and symbolic inscription.