OPINIÃO PÚBLICA E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS: UMA ANÁLISE INTERACTIVA DA INTERAÇÃO ENTRE OS CIDADÃOS E O GOVERNO NO CONTEXTO DA TOMADA DE DECISÕES NA UCRÂNIA

Vitaliy Kryvoshein; Valerii Kononenko; Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi; Iryna Dynnyk; Iryna Lazebna

doi:10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v1i77.6872

OPINIÃO PÚBLICA E POLÍTICAS PÚBLICAS: UMA ANÁLISE INTERACTIVA DA INTERAÇÃO ENTRE OS CIDADÃOS E O GOVERNO NO CONTEXTO DA TOMADA DE DECISÕES NA UCRÂNIA

Vitaliy Kryvoshein, Valerii Kononenko, Bohdan-Petro Koshovyi, Iryna Dynnyk, Iryna Lazebna

Resumo

Objetivo: O artigo tem como objetivo analisar a interação entre a opinião pública e as políticas públicas na Ucrânia, focando em como as relações entre cidadãos e governo influenciam os processos de tomada de decisão. O estudo busca identificar mecanismos e ferramentas que melhorem a participação cidadã na governança, com ênfase no desenvolvimento sustentável.

Metodologia: O estudo utiliza uma metodologia multifacetada, incluindo generalização, síntese, análise jurídica comparativa e modelagem. Também adota uma abordagem de análise interativa para explorar as tendências do impacto da opinião pública nas decisões governamentais. A pesquisa baseia-se em uma revisão de atos legais ucranianos, fontes acadêmicas e ferramentas de comunicação eletrônica que facilitam o engajamento dos cidadãos.

Originalidade: O artigo apresenta uma análise única da interação entre cidadãos e governo na Ucrânia, examinando o papel da opinião pública como ferramenta crítica no processo de tomada de decisão. O estudo introduz um modelo de participação pública e destaca a importância da governança sustentável, contribuindo para a literatura sobre engajamento democrático em estados pós-soviéticos.

Resultados: A pesquisa identifica quatro níveis críticos de envolvimento público na tomada de decisões, com ênfase na necessidade de um diálogo mais intenso entre o governo e os cidadãos. Os resultados revelam que, embora existam mecanismos de participação cidadã, há lacunas na garantia de representação equitativa e processos decisórios inclusivos.

Conclusão: O estudo conclui que a Ucrânia desenvolveu um sistema único de interação entre cidadãos e governo, que precisa ser ampliado para melhorar o engajamento público. A transição para uma abordagem cooperativa e baseada em parcerias é essencial para aprimorar a governança democrática e garantir que as políticas reflitam as necessidades da população.

Palavras-chave

Opinião pública; Políticas públicas; Desenvolvimento sustentável; Engajamento cidadão; Ucrânia;Tomada de decisão.

Texto completo:

PDF

Referências

BLAHUTA, R. et al. Problems of democratic development of the state and society in the conditions of the Russian Federation’s war with Ukraine: Economic and legal aspect. Financial and Credit Activity Problems of Theory and Practice, v. 5, n. 46, p. 417-426, 2022. DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.5.46.2022.3890.

BORYSENKO, O.; CHERNOKALOVA, O. Communication as a tool of public administration: Current trends. Public Administration and Customs Administration, v. 2, n. 25, p. 58-62, 2020. DOI: 10.32836/2310-9653-2020-2.10.

BUBLIY, M. P.; VASILKOVSKY, O. T. Possibilities of adaptation of foreign experience of public administration in the development of electronic governance in Ukraine. Electronic scientific publication “Public Administration and National Security”, n. 6, 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.25313/2617-572X-2022-6-8278. Access on: 18.03.2024.

BURYK, Z.; CHERNIAKHIVSKA, V. The authoritative and public interaction issue in terms of European integration. Public Administration and Customs Administration. Special Issue, p. 19-26, 2022. DOI: 10.32782/2310-9653-2022-spec.3.

CABINET OF MINISTERS OF UKRAINE. Postanova “Pro zabezpechennia uchasti hromadskosti u formuvanni ta realizatsii derzhavnoi polityky”, 3 nov. 2010. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/996-2010-%D0%BF#Text. Access on: [date].

CABINET OF MINISTERS OF UKRAINE. Order On Approval of the Action Plan for the Implementation of the Open Government Partnership in 2023–2025, 17 nov. 2023. Available from: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1049-2023-%D1%80#n10. Access on: [date].

CHALTSEVA, O.; SHVETS, K. Online practices of public policy in Lithuania and Ukraine. Political life, n. 2, p. 63-71, 2020. DOI: 10.31558/2519-2949.2020.2.9.

DAVISON; PHILLIPS, W. Public opinion. In: Encyclopaedia Britannica, 10 feb. 2024. Available from: https://www.britannica.com/topic/public-opinion. Access on: 18.02.2024.

DENYSIUK, A. Mechanisms of implementation of political dialogue in crisis conditions. The Journal of V.N. Karazin Kharkiv National University. Issues of Political Science, n. 42, p. 13-20, 2022. DOI: 10.26565/2220-8089-2022-42-02.

GAVKALOVA, N. et al. Functioning Of United Territorial Communities And Identification Of Main Problems Of Organizational Support Of Local Budget Management. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, v. 2, n. 43, p. 107-117, 2022. DOI: 10.55643/fcaptp.2.43.2022.3708.

GIULIANI, A. The Relevance of Public Opinion for Governments, Supranational Organizations and Global Policy Forums YGC 2020/21. 2022. Available at: https://www.global-solutions-initiative.org/young-global-changers-blog/relevance-of-public-opinion/. Access on: 18.02.2024.

HAISHENG, H. Analyzing online public opinion effect on public policy. Baltic Journal of Law & Politics, v. 15, n. 2, p. 249-270, 2022. DOI: 10.2478/bjlp-2022-001015. Available at: https://versita.com/menuscript/index.php/Versita/article/view/491/606. Access on: 18.03.2024.

HUANG, B. Analyze the Influence of Internet Public Opinion on Public Policy. Open Access Library Journal, v. 7, p. 1-9, 2020. DOI: 10.4236/oalib.1106674.

IACOB, S. E.; HRESTIC, L. M.; ISTRATE, G. A. The new Era of Communication in Public Administration. From Classic to Digital. In: INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE “RISK IN CONTEMPORARY ECONOMY”, 22., 2021, Galati, Romania. Proceedings... Galati: [s.n.], 2021. p. 461-464. DOI: 10.35219/rce20670532140.

ILINA-STOHNIIENKO, V.; MALETS, M. Regarding the modernisation of medical care system for victims of armed conflicts (Ukrainian experience). Futurity Medicine, v. 1, n. 3, p. 35–49, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEM.2022.09.30.04.

KAPLINA, O. Prisoner of War: Special Status in the Criminal Proceedings of Ukraine and the Right to Exchange. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe, v. 4, n. 2(17), p. 8-24, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-5.4-a000438.

KARPCHUK, N.; YUSKIV, B. Political communication discord between the government and the citizens: the case of Ukraine. Torun International Studies, n. 1(12), p. 157–168, 2019. DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/TIS.2019.010.

KRYVOSHEIN, V. Transformation of Political Perceptions in the Age of Information Technologies: Analyzing the Impact on Political Beliefs. Futurity of Social Sciences, v. 1, n. 3, p. 20–32, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.09.20.02.

LIZAKOWSKA, S. Feedback between public authorities and civil society: to the analysis of the issue. Derzhavne upravlinnya: udoskonalennya ta rozvytok, n. 8, 2020. DOI: 10.32702/2307-2156-2020.8.57.

MIKHALCHENKO, A. Electronic Governance in the Process of Making Management Decisions. Scientific notes of Taurida National V.I. Vernadsky University Series: Economy and Management, v. 32, n. 71, p. 39-48, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32838/2523-4803/71-3-7.

PERSSON, M. From opinions to policies: Examining the links between citizens, representatives, and policy change. Electoral Studies, n. 74, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.electstud.2021.102413.

PONOMARENKO, T. Dominance of global brands in the consumer shopping cart: analysis of customer preferences at the global level. Futurity Economics & Law, v. 3, n. 2, p. 61-73, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2023.06.25.05.

RUDENKO, O.; ZAIKA, T. Philosophy of worldview as a basis for world perception and socio-cultural traditions. Futurity Philosophy, v. 2, n. 1, p. 63-77, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.03.30.05.

SAPIŃSKI, A.; POCHOPIEŃ, J. Logistics Innovations and Their Impact on the Development of Transportation Infrastructure in Europe: Future Prospects. Futurity of Social Sciences, v. 1, n. 2, p. 4-17, 2023. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FS.2023.06.20.01.

SHEVCHUK, L. Environmental rights of citizens and legal safeguards for their protection: challenges for the future. Futurity Economics & Law, v. 1, n. 2, p. 4-11, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FEL.2021.06.25.1.

SURMINA-DALECOREY, О.А. Models of communicative activity in public administration. Public management and administration in Ukraine, v. 19, p. 60-64, 2020. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32843/pma2663-5240-2020.19.11.

SZOSTEK, J.; ORLOVA, D. Understandings of democracy and “good citizenship” in Ukraine: utopia for the people, participation in politics not required. Post-Soviet Affairs, v. 38, n. 6, p. 479-496, 2022. DOI: 10.1080/1060586X.2022.2084280.

TAIİER, A. The influence of communication technologies on the efficiency of public administration in Ukraine in emergency conditions. Public Management, v. 4, n. 32, p. 73-79, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32689/2617-2224-2022-4(32)-10.

TAIİER, A. Electronic government and communication technologies of public administration in war-time. Scientific Works of Interregional Academy of Personnel Management. Political Sciences and Public Management, v. 1, n. 67, p. 5-8, 2023. https://doi.org/10.32689/2523-4625-2023-1(67)-1.

TRETYAK, O.; SHULIKA, A.; STAVCHENKO, S.; TYMCHENKO, M. Epistemological guidelines for public authorities` economic decisions making: evaluation problems and heuristic perspectives. Financial and Credit Activity: Problems of Theory and Practice, v. 5, n. 46, p. 325-333, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.55643/fcaptp.5.46.2022.3849.

TURII, O. Some aspects of the interaction of civil society organizations with state authorities as a factor in the development of civil society. Electronic scientific journal «Derzhavne upravlinnya: udoskonalennya ta rozvytok», n. 8, 2017. Available at: http://www.dy.nayka.com.ua/?op=1&z=1115. Access on: 18.03.2024.

VASYLKOVSKYI, O. Forms of interaction of public authorities with the public. Scientific innovations and advanced technologies, v. 11, p. 32-43, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52058/2786-5274-2022-11(13)-32-42.

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Constitution of Ukraine, 1996, June 28. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2862-17#Text. Access on: 18.03.2024.

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro mistseve samovriaduvannia” [A law of Ukraine “On local self-government”]. 21 may 1997. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/280/97-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text. Access on: 18.03.2024. (In Ukrainian).

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Zakon Ukrainy “Pro sotsialnyi dialoh v Ukraini” [A law of Ukraine “On social dialogue”]. 23 December 2010. Available at: https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/en/254%D0%BA/96-%D0%B2%D1%80#Text. Access on: 18.03.2024. (In Ukrainian).

VERKHOVNA RADA OF UKRAINE. Draft Law on Public Consultations. 6 February 2024. Available at: https://w1.c1.rada.gov.ua/pls/zweb2/webproc4_1?pf3511=70235. Access on: Access on: 18.03.2024. (In Ukrainian).

VICEN, V.; RUZINSKA, E.; YEVSTAKHEVYCH, A. Large enterprises of Ukraine, sustainable development and social responsibility: transparency in times of crisis. Law, Business and Sustainability Herald, v. 1, n. 1, p. 14-22, 2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.46489/lbsh.2021-1-1-2.

YATSENKO, N. The philosophical content of the definition of the national mentality. Futurity Philosophy, v. 1, n. 1, p. 41-56, 2022. DOI: https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2022.03.30.04.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v1i77.6872