INVESTIGATOR’S ACTIVITY WHEN THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION TERMINATES WITH AN INDICTMENT

Elmir Alimamedov; Anatoliy Belkin; Natalia Makeeva; Viktor Bezryadin; Svetlana Vetskaya

doi:10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i69.5676

INVESTIGATOR’S ACTIVITY WHEN THE PRELIMINARY INVESTIGATION TERMINATES WITH AN INDICTMENT

Elmir Alimamedov, Anatoliy Belkin, Natalia Makeeva, Viktor Bezryadin, Svetlana Vetskaya

Resumo

Objective: In spite of a detailed regulation procedures of the termination of preliminary investigation with an indictment, the current criminal procedure legislation of the Russian Federation has not only failed to address numerous issues but also provoked many problems that require scientific research and incorporation in the legislation as well as in judicial practice.

Methodology: To study those issues, it is relevant both in theory and practice to conduct a complex analysis of an investigator’s actions at the termination of preliminary investigation. In this way, this paper provides support for theoretical grounds that reveal the essence and content of the investigator’s activities at the termination of preliminary investigation with an indictment.

Results: The results can serve as a basis for further studies aimed at solving issues at the pretrial stage of criminal proceedings including its final phase. The justification of the suggested solutions has implications for the development of criminal law theory, especially as it regards the termination of preliminary investigation with an indictment.

Contributions: The suggestions can be used in law-making and criminal justice authorities’ practice. Those suggestions may help solve a crucial theoretical and practical issue of improving the performance of the investigator at the termination of criminal proceedings.

Palavras-chave

court; indictment; investigator; preliminary investigation; pre-trial proceedings; prosecution; prosecutor

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências

DUNG, Vo Kim, IVANOV, Dmitriy Aleksandrovich, PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich, KHORYAKOV, Sergey Nikolaevich, KREMNEVA, Elena Aleksandrovna. Genesis of the institute for the compensation of detriment caused by crime. Propositos y Representaciones, vol. 9, no. S1, pp. 1398, 2021. https://doi.org/10.20511/pyr2021.v9nSPE1.1398

IVANOV, Dmitry A., KULIKOV, Michail A. International standards of preventive measures and their implementation in the legislation of the Russian Federation. All-Russian Journal of Criminology, vol. 14, no. 4, pp. 623-630, 2020. https://doi.org/10.17150/2500-4255.2020.14(4).623-630

NGUYEN, Van Tien, PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich, TOKAREVA, Ekaterina Viktorovna, MAKEEV, Alexey Vasilyevich, SHEPELEVA, Olga Rinatovna. Compensation for Damage Caused by a Crime in the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and the Russian Federation. Jurnal Cita Hukum, vol. 9, no. 2, pp. 211-220, 2021. https://doi.org/10.15408/jch.v9i2.21738

PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich, FADEEV, Pavel Vladimirovich, KHMELEV, Sergey Alexandrovich, VAN TIEN, Nguyen, TRISHKINA, Ekaterina Alekseevna, TSVILIY-BUKLANOVA, Anna Alexandrovna. Crimes in the Military-Industrial Complex (MIC). International Journal of Recent Technology and Engineering, vol. 8, no. 3, pp. 7950-7952, 2019. https://doi.org/10.35940/ijrte.C6635.098319

PUSHKAREV, Viktor Victorovich, TRISHKINA, Ekaterina Alekseevna, TOKAREVA, Ekaterina Viktorovna, CUONG, Bui Tran, SHEPELEVA, Olga Rinatovna. The Adversarial Approach in the Pre-trial Phase of Prosecution. Cuestiones Políticas, vol. 37, no 65, pp. 281-287, 2020. https://doi.org/10.46398/cuestpol.3865.21

SAVKA, Olga G. The influence of the humanitarian environment on improving the quality of training specialists in a technical university. Russian Technological Journal, vol. 9, no. 5(42), pp. 95-102, 2021. https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2021-9-5-95-101

SUPREME COURT OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION, RESOLUTION OF THE PLENUM ON NO. 1. “About application of regulations of the Code of penal procedure of the Russian Federation by courts”, Vestnik Konstitutsionnogo Suda Rossiyskoy Federatsii, 5 March, 2004. Available at: http://supcourt.ru/documents/own/8272/

THE DECISION OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT NO. 239-O. “On the request of the Ostankino District Court for the constitutional review of Art. 53, Part 2 and Art. 120, Part 2, Para. 1 of the RSFSR Criminal Procedure Code”, December 15, 2000.

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i69.5676