Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
Ocultar
Mostrar todos
LA SISTEMATIZACIÓN DEL ORDENAMIENTO INTERNACIONAL A PARTIR DE LA HUMANIZACIÓN DE LA AGENDA GLOBAL: EL PAPEL DE LA CORTE INTERNACIONAL DE JUSTICIA
Resumen
Objetivo: Esta investigación pretende analizar la humanización del Derecho Internacional en la Corte Internacional de Justicia, a través del estudio del caso de Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (República de Guinea vs. República Democrática del Congo), para rechazar los argumentos sobre la supuesta fragmentación del Derecho Internacional, reafirmando el carácter sistémico del orden internacional.
Metodología: La investigación es de carácter cualitativo, predominantemente bibliográfica y documental, guiada por la metodología de investigación hipotético-deductiva.
Resultados: Como resultado de esta investigación es posible identificar que la Corte Internacional de Justicia, principal órgano judicial de las Naciones Unidas, al tramitar y juzgar las demandas que involucran la protección internacional de los derechos humanos, no contribuye a la fragmentación del derecho internacional. Ello se debe a que la mera coexistencia de normas judiciales con jurisdicciones concurrentes no conduce a un desequilibrio en el derecho internacional.
Contribuciones: Este estudio contribuye al debate sobre la visión sistémica del derecho internacional, que permite una mayor cohesión y eficacia en el orden internacional. Esto significa que es posible identificar que el carácter humanista presente en la agenda global -y en la Corte Internacional de Justicia- orienta el derecho internacional hacia un único objetivo, que es la realización de la justicia internacional.
Palabras Clave: Corte Internacional de Justicia; Derechos Humanos; Derecho Internacional; Humanización; Visión sistémica.
ABSTRACT
Objective: This research aims to analyze the humanization of International Law at the International Court of Justice, through the study of the case of Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic Republic of the Congo), in order to reject the arguments about the supposed fragmentation of international law, reaffirming the systemic character of the international order.
Methodology: The research, qualitative in nature, is predominantly bibliographic and documental, guided by the hypothetical-deductive research methodology.
Results: It is possible to identify as results of the present investigation that the International Court of Justice, the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, when processing and judging claims that involve the international protection of human rights, does not contribute to the fragmentation of international law. This is because the mere coexistence of court rules with competing jurisdictions does not lead to an imbalance in international law.
Contributions: The study brings as its contribution the discussion on the systemic vision of International Law, which allows for greater cohesion and effectiveness to the international order. This means that it is possible to identify that the humanist character present in the global agenda - and in the International Court of Justice - guides international law towards a single objective, which is the realization of international justice.
Keywords: International Court of Justice; Human Rights; International Law; Humanization; Systemic View.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (Português (Brasil))Referencias
BEDIN, Gilmar Antonio; BARCELLOS, Mardjele da Silva; Schunemann, Cristiane. A transformação da Sociedade Internacional Clássica e a crescente Jurisdicionalização do Direito Internacional. Revista Direitos Fundamentais e Democracia, [s.l.], v. 8, n. 8, p. 2-19, 2010.
BORGES, Murilo. Direito Constitucional brasileiro e o fortalecimento das Cortes Internacionais: A importância de utilizar precedentes internacionais na proteção dos Direitos Humanos. Revista Internacional da Academia Paulista de Direito, v. 1, n. 5, p. 336-367, 2020.
BORGES, Murilo; SQUEFF, Tatiana Cardoso. A Agenda Internacional Humanizada sob judice no âmbito da Corte Internacional de Justiça: Uma questão de fragmentação ou sistematização?. In: MENEZES, Wagner; FILHO, Aldo Nunes; OLIVEIRA, Paulo Henrique Reis de. (Orgs.). Tribunais Internacionais e a Garantia dos Direitos Sociais. Curitiba: Academia Brasileira de Direito Internacional, 2021.
CANÇADO TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto. The Emancipation of the Individual from His Own State – The Historical Recovery of the Human Person as Subject of the Law of Nations. In: Breitenmmoser, S. et al. (Edts.). Human Rights, Democracy and the Rule of Law – Liber Amicorum L. Wildhaber. Zürich: Baden-Baden, Dike: Nomos, 2007.
CANÇADO TRINDADE, Antônio Augusto. Tratado de Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos. Porto Alegre: Fabris Editora, 2003.
CAPUCIO, Camilla. A fragmentação do Direito Internacional: entre o discurso e a realidade do sistema jurídico internacional. Revista da Faculdade de Direito da USP, v. 111, pp. 311-338, 2016.
FISCHER-LESCANO, Andreas; TEUBNER, Gunther. Regime-collisions: the vein search for legal unity in the fragmentation of global law. Michigan Journal of International Law, Ann Harbour, [s.l.], v. 25, n. 4, p. 999-1046, 2004.
GUGGENHEIM, Paul. Traité de droit international public. Genève: Librailie de I’Université, Georg & Cie S.A, 1954.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Judgement of 19 June 2012]. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2012e. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/case/103. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Memorial of the Republic of Guinea, 23 March 2010]. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2010. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/103/13496.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Judgement of 30 November 2010], p. 65. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2010. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/103/13496.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Preliminary Objections submitted by the Democratic Republic of the Congo, 01 October 2002; Judgement of 30 November 2010]. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2002. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/103/13500.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Preliminary Objections of 24 mai 2007]. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2007. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/103/103-20070524-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Judgement of 30 November 2010. Separate Opinion of Judge Cançado Trindade], p. 95. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2010. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/103/103-20101130-JUD-01-05-EN.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Ahmadou Sadio Diallo (Republic of Guinea v. Democratic of the Congo). [Judgement of 19 June 2012 – compensation]. [s.l.]: ICJ, 2012. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/103/13496.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
ICJ, International Court of Justice. Case Military and Paramilitary Activities in and against Nicaragua (Nicaragua v. United States of America). [Judgment of 27 June 1986]. [s.1]: ICJ, 1986, p. 90-91. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/public/files/case-related/70/070-19860627-JUD-01-00-EN.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
KOSKENNIEMI, Martii; LEINO, Päivi. Fragmentation of International Law? Modern Anxieties. Leiden Journal of International Law, Leiden, v. 15, p. 223-579, 2002.
KOSKENNIEMI, Martti. The fate of public international law: constitutional utopia or fragmentation?. Chorley Lecture: London School of Economics, 2006.
LUHMANN, Kikklas. Introdução a Teoria dos Sistemas: aulas publicadas por Javier Torres Nafarrate. Trad. Ana Cristina A. Nasser. Petrópolis: Ed. Vozes, 2009.
LUHMANN, Kikklas. Risk: a sociological theory. New Jersey: Transaction Publishers, 2005.
LUHMANN, Nikklas. La sociedade de la sociedad. Trad. Javier Torres Nafarrate. Guadalajara: UIA, 2007.
LUHMANN, Niklas. Sistemas sociales: lineamentos para uma teoria general. México: Universidad Iberoamericana – Santafé de Bogotá: CEJA. Pontifícia Universidade Javeriana. 1998.
MENEZES, Wagner. Tribunais internacionais: jurisdição e competência. São Paulo: Saraiva, 2013.
NASSER, Salem Hikmat. Direito Global em Pedaços: Fragmentação, Regimes e Pluralismo. Revista de Direito Internacional, v. 12, n. 2, p. 98-138, 2015.
OAU, Organization of African Unity. African Charter on Human and Peoples' Rights (Banjul Charter). Adopted by the Ministerial Conference of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in Banjul, The Gambia, in January 1981, and adopted by the XVIII Assembly of Heads of State and Government of the Organization of African Unity (OAU) in Nairobi, Kenya, on 27 July 1981. Disponible: http://www.dhnet.org.br/direitos/sip/africa/banjul.htm. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
PETERS, Anne. The refinement of international law: From fragmentation to regime interaction and pollicization. Oxford University Press and New York University School of Law, v. 15, n. 3, p. 671-704, 2017.
ROSSI, Juliano Scherner. O papel da Corte Internacional de Justiça na Fragmentação do Direito Internacional. In: Menezes, Wagner; Moschen, Valeska Raizer Borges (Org.). Direito Internacional. Florianópolis: FUNJAB, p. 399-421, 2013.
SOUZA, Henrique Santos Costa de. O Fundamento do Direito Internacional Contemporâneo: O Ser Humano e suas Dimensões. In: Menezes, Wagner (Org.). Direito Internacional Contemporâneo e seu Fundamento. Arraes Editores, 2014.
SQUEFF, Tatiana Cardoso; RODRIGUES, Dulcilene Aparecida Mapelli. O aporte luhmanniano acerca dos direitos humanos na sociedade (mundial). In: Silva, Matheur Passos; Santos, Ruth Maria P. O papel do Direito na solução das demandas contemporâneas. Brasília: Vestnik, 2016.
UN, United Nations. General Assembly. International Law Commission. Fragmentation of International Law: difficulties arising from the diversification and expansion of International Law. Doc. A/CN.4/L.682. New York, 13 apr. 2006.
UN, United Nations. International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights. Adopted and opened for signature, ratification and accession by United Nations General Assembly Resolution 2200-A (XXI) of 16 December 1966. [s.l.]: UN, 1966. Disponible: https://www.cne.pt/sites/default/files/dl/2_pacto_direitos_civis_politicos.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
UN, United Nations. Vienna Convention on Consular Relations. Concluded on April 18, 1961, at the conclusion of the United Nations Conference on diplomatic relations and immunities, held at Neue Hofburg, in the Austrian capital, in March and April 1961. Disponible: http://www.careproject.eu/database/upload/PTother020/PTother020Text.pdf. Acceso en: 25 fev. 2022.
UN, United Nations. International Court of Justice. Statute of the International Court of Justice. [S.l.]: UN, 2021b. Disponible: https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute. Acceso en: 20 jan. 2022.
YUSUF, Abdulqawi A. Keynote Speech of Judge Abdulqawi. In: YUSUF, A. President of the International Court of Justice. Londres: The London Conference on International Law: Engaging with International Law, 2019.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i69.5877
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista Jurídica e-ISSN: 2316-753X
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
