POLICY OF CULTURAL-CIVILIZATIONAL TRADITIONALISM IN CULTURAL-HISTORICAL RETROSPECT
Resumo
This study investigates the cultural-civilizational gap between traditionalism and modernization in Russian history, with a focus on how cultural-symbolic events during periods of crisis have influenced the nation's historical development. A multidisciplinary approach was used, combining historical analysis with cultural and philosophical perspectives. The study critically reviewed primary and secondary sources, including historical records and philosophical texts, to identify and analyze key cultural-symbolic events. The findings demonstrate that cultural-symbolic events have played a significant role in both preserving and transforming Russian cultural identity. The study concludes that traditional values continue to be a foundational element of Russian cultural identity. The proposed cultural-symbolic event model offers a new methodological framework for analyzing the continuity and change in Russia's cultural and civilizational development.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
Adrianova-Peretts, V. P. (Ed.). (1996). Povest vremennykh let [The Russian primary chronicle]. St. Petersburg: Nauka, 668 p.
Ebrahimi, M., Yusoff, K., & Idris, A. (2024). Unity in Diverse Society of Malaysia. Journal of Lifestyle and SDGs Review, 5(1), e03493.
https://doi.org/10.47172/2965-730X.SDGsReview.v5.n01.pe03493
Fennell, J. (1989). Krizis srednevekovoi Rusi. 1200-1304 [The crisis of medieval Russia. 1200-1304]. Moscow: Progress, 296 p.
Gumilev, L. N. (2008). Ot Rusi do Rossii: Ocherki etnicheskoi istorii [Rus to Russia: Essays on ethnic history]. Moscow: Airis-press, 320 p.
Heidegger, M. (2003). Bytie i vremia [Being and time]. Kharkiv: Folio, 509 p.
Heidegger, M. (2023). Sobytie [The event]. St. Petersburg: Aleteiia, 336 p.
Ignatova, V. S., & Rimskiy, V. P. (2012). Problema "traditsii – innovatsii" i genezis nauchno-innovatsionnykh subkultur (kulturno-tsivilizatsionnyi kontekst) [The problem of "tradition – innovation" and the genesis of scientific and innovative subcultures (cultural and civilizing context]. Science. Arts. Cuntire, 1, 34-57.
Petrov, M. K. (1973). Iazyk i kategorialnye struktury [Language and categorical structures]. In E. Ia. Rezhabek (Ed.), Naukovedenie i istoriia kultury: Collected articles (pp. 58-82). Rostov-on-Don: North Caucasus Scientific Center of Higher Education.
Petrov, M. K. (1991). Iazyk, znak, kultura [Language, sign, culture]. Moscow: Science. Main Editorial Office of Oriental Literature, 328 p.
Petrov, M. K. (1992). Samosoznanie i nauchnoe tvorchestvo [Self-consciousness and scientific creativity]. Rostov-on-Don: Rostov University Publishing House, 272 p.
Podoroga, V. A. (2010). Sobytie [The event]. In Novaia filosofskaia entsiklopediia (Vol. 3, pp. 582-584). Moscow: Mysl.
Rimskiy, V. P. (1998). Totalitarnyi kosmos i chelovek [The totalitarian cosmos and man]. Belgorod: BelSU, 126 p.
Rimskiy, V. P. (Ed.). (2017). Uchrezhdaiushchaia diskursivnost Mikhaila Petrova: Intellektual v interere kulturnogo kapitala [The founding discursivity of Mikhail Petrov: An intellectual in the interior of cultural capital]: Monograph. Moscow: Kanon+ ROOI "Reabilitatsiia", 456 p.
Rimskiy, V. P., & Oleshchenko, E. O. (2023). Metamorfozy vremeni v tsivilizatsii Moderna [Metamorphoses of time in the Modern civilization]. Belgorod: "Epitsentr" LLC, 140 p.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v3i79.7642
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Jurídica e-ISSN: 2316-753X
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181