Envoyer cet article par courriel 
Masquer
Afficher tout
PROVOCAÇÃO INJUSTA E INFLUÊNCIA DA CULPA
Résumé
Objetivo: o objetivo deste estudo foi a provocação injusta e a influência do crime.
Métodos: Trata-se de uma pesquisa descritiva em que os pesquisadores examinaram documentos relacionados ao tema e utilizaram fontes bibliográficas.
Resultados: Em nossa lei, para podermos dizer que a culpabilidade é afetada por um ato que constitui injustiça, dor e raiva, que são todos tipos de excitação, esses sentimentos devem estar intensamente concentrados no indivíduo. Contudo, quando analisamos o direito comparado, torna-se evidente que pode não ser possível defini-lo em todos os sistemas jurídicos. O nível de excitação que pode levar a uma provocação injusta varia dependendo dos sistemas jurídicos dos diferentes países. Na nossa lei, a dor e a raiva que resultam em injustiça são consideradas de igual importância.
Conclusão: Assim, quando os indivíduos cometem um crime sob diversas condições e com um certo nível de excitação, raiva e dor, podem receber uma punição criminal reduzida. No entanto, nem todo tipo de excitação pode ser considerado uma situação que justifique a punição dos indivíduos nos termos da lei penal.
Mots-clés
Texte intégral :
PDF (Português (Brasil))Références
Açıkgöz, M., Soyaslan, D. “., & Dönmezer, S. E. (2012, p. 61-62). Unjust Provocation in Penal Law”, Adalet Yay., Ankara.
Amendments to the Regulations under the Patent Cooperation Treaty (PCT). (2019, July). https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/notifications/details/treaty_pct_214-annex. www.wipo.int: https://www.wipo.int/wipolex/en/treaties/notifications/details/treaty_pct_214-annex adresinden alındı
Article 27 of the Penal Code of Turkey states: "In cases where the limit is exceeded without intent in circumstances that eliminate criminal liability, and if the act is punished even when committed negligently, the penalty prescribed by law for a neglige. (tarih yok).
Artuk/Gökcen/Alşahin/Çakır, p. 543, Savaş/Mollamahmutoğlu, p. 692. (tarih yok).
Aydın, D. (2005). Unjust Provocation in the New Penal Code of Turkey, AÜHF, Vol. 54.
Bakıcı, S. ( 2007). General Provisions of Penal Law within the Scope of Law No. 5237, 1st Edition. Ankara: Adalet Publishing House.
Başar, N. (1980; p353-365). Tutumlu, p. 64; Ayık, p. 102; r, “Unjust Provocation in Penal Law of Turkey. – II”, Adalet Magazine, Y.71, No.4, July – August 1980, p. 353-365, p. 359.
Bayar, A. H. (2012). “Comparison of Chain Crime with Similar Practices”. p. 111., Justice Magazine, No. 42, 2012.
Behiy, E. K. (2013). The Effect of the Victim's Behavior and State of Excitement on Criminal Responsibility Unjust Provocation. D.U. Faculty of Law Journal Vol:15, Special Issue.
Bostancı Bozbayındır , p. 182. (tarih yok). Centel/Zafer/Yerener Çakmut, p. 445; Tan, p. 1026. .
Bostancı Bozbayındır; Dönmezer et al., p. 351; Tutumlu, p. 64; Duran, p. 227; Başar, p. 359. (tarih yok). ; Dönmezer et al., p. 351; Tutumlu, p. 64; Duran, p. 227; Başar, p. 359.
Bozbayındır, G. B. (2013, p. 172). Unjust Provocation in Penal Law. Istanbul.
C.G.K, T. S. (tarih yok). The Supreme Court C.G.K. in its decision numbered T13.05.1991, E1991/7651, K1991/318 summarizes the following: "First of all, it is necessary to investigate whether the acts attributed to the perpetrator and the evidence useful to prove provocation have b.
Çağlayan, M. M. (1982, p. 15). An Explanation Attempt on Unfair Provocation in the Light of the Supreme Court Jurisprudence. Ankara: Adalet Magazine, Y. 73, No. 1, January – February .
Code of Turkey Publication: PC No. 5237. . (tarih yok). Publication: PC No. 320 entered into force and it was published 13/3/1926, it was repealed in 2005 with the entry into force of the Penal Code of Turkey No. 5237. . Turkey, No. 320 entered into force and it was published 13/3/1926, it was repealed in 2005 with the entry into force of the Penal .
Decision of Supreme Court. C.G.K. ( 2023, 02 12.). Decision of Supreme Court. C.G.K., T04.7.2000, E2000/1-150, K2000/151, see Lexpara.com.tr, Online Access Time,.
Demirbaş Ekerbiçer, p. 20; . (tarih yok). Unjust Provocation, p.95; Duran, p.15.
Demirbaş, T. (2009, p. 401). "Penal Law, General Provisions", 6th Edition. Ankara: DEMİRBAŞ, Timur. Unjust provocation. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing, 2016, p. 13-38; According to another definition, unjust provocation is "when the perpetrator commits a crim.
Dönmezer et al. (2022).
Dönmezer, S., Erman, S., Bayraktar, K., Keskin Kiziroğlu, S., Zafer, H., Memiş Kartal, P., . . . Önok, R. M. (2019). Theoretical and Practical Penal Law. 14th Ed. Volume 2. Istanbul:. Theoretical and Practical Penal Law. 14th Ed. Volume 2. Istanbul:.
Duran, G. Y. (2010, p. 6.). “Unjust Provocation in Penal Law", . Istanbul : First edition,.
Dursun, S. ( 2003, vol: LXI, p. 20-21.). The Victim Causing Crime”, . Ankara: İÜHFM.
Erem, F., Artuk, M. E., & Danışman, A. ( (1997)). General Provisions of Penal Law, 1st Edition, Ankara.
Erhan, G. (2009, p. 136). “Unjust Provocation”,. Ankara: Ekerbiçer Dilaver, “Unjust Provocation in Penal Law”, 1 Edition., Ankara, 2015, p. 16.
Gökalp, İ. (2007, p. 56.). Unjust Provocation. Unpublished Master's Thesis: Gazi University, Institute of Social Sciences, Department of Public Law, Department of Penal Law and Penal Procedure Law.
Government Gazette . (2003, October 24). https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/25611a0.pdf. https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/25611a0.pdf: https://www.gov.za/sites/default/files/gcis_document/201409/25611a0.pdf adresinden alındı
Gürelli, p. 341; Erem/Danışman/Artuk, p. 603. (tarih yok).
Hakeri, H. (2011, Volume 11 p.348). “General Provisions of Penal Law”. Ankara.https://www.seckin.com.tr/browser/fa/231865813/kitap/Prof.%20Dr.%20Mehmet%20Emin%20Artuk. (p.952; Koca/Üzülmez, p. 362).
Kangal, Z. T. (2010). Unjust Provocation in Penal Law of Turkey, EÜHFD, Vol. 14, P. 3-4. Unjust Provocation in Penal Law of Turkey, EÜHFD, Vol. 14, P. 3-4.
Karadeniz, F. S., & Mahmutoğlu, S. (tarih yok). Penal Code of Turkey General Provisions Commentary”. Istanbul: Beta Publishing, 2017, p.641-642; Artuk/Gökcen/Yeni Dünya, p.952.
Kazancı, B. E. (2013, p.1326.). The Effect of the Victim's Behavior and State of Excitement on Criminal Responsibility. Aydin, p. 231; . “ - Unjust Provocation”. D.U. Journal of the Faculty of Law Vol:15, Special Issue, .
Koca, M., & İlhan, Ü. (2018). General Provisions of Penal Law of Turkey, 11th Edition. Ankara: Ankara: Seçkin Publishing House.
Koca, Ü. (2007, p. 557). General Provisions of Penal Law within the Scope of Law No. 5237. Ankara: Sekcuk University Faculty of Law Journal vol. 26 .
Koray Özbek, V. D. ( 2017, 8th Edition. Ankara, Seçkin Publishing, p. 397-398). General Provisions of Penal Code of Turkey. Ankara: Dönmezer/ Erman/ Bayraktar/ Keskin Kiziroğlu/ Zafer/ Memiş Kartal/ Sınar/ Erman/ Eroğlu/ Önok,.
LAW REFORM COMMISSIONER. (1979). It is evident that the application of unjust provocation has evolved beyond the examples of crimes given below. As such, the perpetrator cannot be given a reduction due to unjust provocation due to the crime of robbery, see Supreme Court of Appeals 5th C. https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/62008NCJRS.pdf: https://www.ojp.gov/pdffiles1/Digitization/62008NCJRS.pdf adresinden alındı
Nihat Özön, M. (1973). TDK Ottoman-Turkish Dictonary. 5th Edition, Istanbul, Ankara, 1995, p. 1021 p. 700 “TDK Ottoman-Turkish Dictionary, Devellioğlu, Ferit, "Encyclopedic Ottoman-Turkish Dictionary", 12th Edition, Aydın Publishing House: Par, Arif Hikmet, "Ottoman-Turkish Dicti.
Özen, M. Z. ( 2013). 4th Edition, Volume 1. Ankara: Ankara: US-A Publishing.
Öztürk, p.280. (tarih yok).
Penal Code of Turkey, art 129. (tarih yok). Article 129 of the Penal Code of Turkey envisages the following: “The Insulting on Account of an Unjust Act or Reciprocal Insult - "(1) Where the insult is committed as a response to a civil tort, a penalty may be reduced by up to one third (or not imopos adresinden alındı
Penal Code. (tarih yok). Önder, p. 377-381; Demirbaş, Unjust Provocation, p. 68-95; Gürelli, Nevzat, “Unjust Provocation as an Excuse in Penal Law”, İBD, Vol. XXV, June 1951, p. 333; Artuk Mehmet Emin / Gökçen Ahmet / Alşahin Mehmet Emin / Çakır Kerim, “General Provisions of Pena.
Penal Code of Turkey,. (tarih yok). Penal Code of Turkey,. For example, in Article 272 of the Penal Code of Turkey, a special reason for provocation is foreseen in this provision which states that “If a civil servant violates the boundaries of their duties and causes the acts described in the articles to happen t. Turkey Assembly.
Pulat, G. A. (2018). Explanation of the Penal Code of Turkey”. 128-154.
Savaş/Mollamahmutoğlu, p.103; See also Supreme Court CGK decision No., 13.02.1984T. 1-305/61E/K see lexpara.com.tr, Online Access Time, 19.06.2023. (tarih yok).
See Supreme Court of Appeals 1st CD., T30.11.2006, Decision No. E/K2540/5341, lexpara.com.tr, Online Access Time, 10.10.2023. (tarih yok).
Şen, E. /., & Centel, N. Z. (2013). Introduction to Penal Law of Turkey. Istanbul: Beta Yayın., 10th Edition,.
Shahbaz. (tarih yok). Artuk/Gökcen/Yeni Dünya, p.949; Dönmezer /Erman/ Bayraktar/ Keskin Kiziroğlu/Zafer/Memiş Kartal/Sınar/Erman/Eroğlu/Önok. Yaşar/Gökcan/Artuç, p.847, Shahbaz, p.265; Yaşar/Gökcan/Artuç, p.847; Artuk/Gökcen/Yeni Dünya, p.949; Dönmezer /Erman/ Bayraktar/ Keskin Kiziroğlu/Zafer/Memiş Kartal/Sınar/Erman/Eroğlu/Önok, p. 603; Erem/Danışman/Artuk, p. 595.
Shkëlqe, A. (2015). Commentary of Penal Code of Turkey. Commentary of Penal Code of Turkey, 2nd Edition. Ankara: Bilge Publishing House, Volume 1, 2015, p. 338; Yaşar/Gökcan/Artuç, 2014, p.847; Artuk/Gökcen/Yeni Dünya, p. 950; Centel/Zafer/Yerener Çakmut, p.443; Dönmezer et al., p.603; Günay, p.
Some authors, argue that the binary distinction in question is not accurate, pointing out the difficulty of its application. The judge may struggle to apply the unjust provocation regulation solely based on their subjective opinion. Conversely, investigat. (tarih yok).
Sulhi, D. (2003, p.237; Önder, p.346). General Penal Law Lessons. Istanbul.
Supreme Court C.G.K. in its decision number T19.11.1990. (1990, 11). , E/K1-254/277, stated that "Provocation, in terms of criminal law, involves the act of directing and encouraging an individual to commit a crime and mobilizing them to so by influencing their will. I.
Tan, M. (2013 , Volume 1, 2011, 1022.). General Provisions of Penal Code of Turkey. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık, .
TDK Dictionary. (2023, 01 28). https://sozluk.gov.tr/. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ adresinden alındı
Turkish minute. (2023, december In its decision with number 2017/14-110 E. 2018/557 dated 22.11.2018, the Penal Board of the Supreme Court of Appeals stated that "Similar to the Penal Code of Turkey number 765, there is no limitation in the Penal Code of Turkey numbered 5237 stating tha). https://turkishminute.com/2023/12/08/top-court-annul-controversial-law-punishing-crime-committed-behalf-of-an-organization/. https://turkishminute.com/2023/12/08/top-court-annul-controversial-law-punishing-crime-committed-behalf-of-an-organization/ adresinden alındı
Tutumlu, M. A. (1999). Unjust Provocation General and Special Provisions in Penal Code of Turkey, Adil Yayın., Ankara.
Tutumlu, M. A. (1999). Unjust Provocation General and Special Provisions in Penal Law of Turkey, Adil Yayın.,. Ankara: Ankara, 1999 p. 22; Bardak, Cengiz, “A Study on Unjust Provocation”, Justice Magazine, No. 1, 1988, p. 43.
With the "Law on the amendment of various laws" with number 4771 dated 03.08.2002T, many of the special regulations were abolished. (tarih yok).
Yaşar, Osman ; Gökcan, Hasan Tahsin : Artuç, Mustafa. (2014). (tarih yok). nterpreted-Applied Penal Code of Turkey, 2nd Edition, Ankara: Adalet Publishing House, Volume 1.
Yaşar/Gökcan/Artuç, p.743; Öztürk B./ Erdem M.R., “Applied Criminal Law and Security Measures Law”, 11th Edition, Ankara 2011, p.279; Zafer H., “General Provisions of Penal Law”, Istanbul, 2010, p.268; Demirbaş, p.411. (tarih yok).
Yavuz, M. (2013). “Unjust Provocation”. Justice Magazine, Issue: 46. “Unjust Provocation”. Justice Magazine, Issue: 46.
Yerdelen, E. S., & Beyhan, M. (2016). Special Circumstances in the Crime of Premeditated Murder and the Comment of the Supreme Court”. “Special Circumstances in the Crime of Premeditated Murder and the Comment of the Supreme Court”, Journal of Criminal Law, Volume: 11, Issue: 32, 2016, p. 29-61., 29-61.
Zafer H. ( 2010). General Provisions of Penal Law, Istanbul.
Zafer, C., & Çakmut, Y. (2019, p. 444.).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v2i78.6937
Renvois
- Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.
Revista Jurídica e-ISSN: 2316-753X
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
