Enviar artigo via e-mail 
Ocultar
Exibir todos
PROBLEMS OF LEGAL REGULATION OF THE RISKS OF USING ROBOTIC AND INFOCOMMUNICATION TECHNOLOGIES FROM THE POINT OF VIEW OF INFORMATION SECURITY
Resumo
Objective: This article examined the problems of legal regulation of risks arising from the use of cyber-physical systems, artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects. Particular attention in the article was paid to the legal and essential aspects of the application of the above technologies from the point of view of information security.
Methodology: The authors analyzed, from a legal standpoint, the most significant issues related to the identification, prevention and minimization of risks that arise from using cyber-physical systems, artificial intelligence technologies and robotics in various areas of public relations.
Results: Authors examined both the very nature of "risk" as a concept and its regulatory and legal interpretation. Also authors studied the existing approaches to the classification of risks of using these technologies from the standpoint of the scientific community and information security experts.
Contribution: The authors substantiated the need for legal regulation of processes related to the identification, prevention and minimization of the risks that arise from using cyber-physical systems, artificial intelligence technologies and robotics technologies.
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
Ageshkina, N. A. (2018). Commentary to the Federal Law of December 27, 2002 N 184-FZ "On Technical Regulation" (itemized). Saratov: Ay Pi Er Media.
Aristov, E. V., & Kuznetsova, O. A. (2018). On the formation and development of the law of robots (legal regulation of robotics). Science and education: household and economy; entrepreneurship; law and governance, 8(99), 58–62.
Avdiyskiy, V. I., & Lapina, M. A. (eds.). (2014). Legal risks in the public administration system. Moscow: OT i DO.
Boholm, A., & Corvellec, H. (2011). A relational theory of risk. Journal of Risk Research, 14(2), 175-190. https://doi.org/10.1080/13669877.2010.515313
Boyes, H. (2015, May). Cyber security attributes for critical infrastructure systems. Cyber Security Review https://www.cybersecurity-review.com/articles/cyber-security-attributes-for-critical-infrastructure-systems
Burenin, A. N., & Legkov, K. E. (2015). Security issues of infocommunication systems and special-purpose networks: main threats, methods and means of ensuring integrated network security. Science-intensive technologies in space research of the Earth, (3), 46–61.
Čerka, P., Grigienė, J., & Sirbikytė, G. (2015). Liability for damages caused by artificial intelligence. Computer Law & Security Review, 31(3), 376-389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2015.03.008
Chernyak, L. V. (2014). Cyber-physical systems at the start. Open systems. DBMS, (2), 10-11.
European Commission (2019, 08 April). Ethics guidelines for trustworthy AI. https://ec.europa.eu/digital-single-market/en/news/ethics-guidelines-trustworthy-ai
European Parliament (2017, 16 February). European Parliament resolution of 16 February 2017 with recommendations to the Commission on Civil Law Rules on Robotics (2015/2103 (INL)). https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/TA-8-2017-0051_EN.html
Fasmer, M. (2022). Risk. The etymological online dictionary of the Russian language by Max Fasmer. https://vasmer.lexicography.online/р/риск
Friedberg, I., McLaughlin, K., Smith, P., Laverty, D., & Sezer, S. (2017). STPA-SafeSec: Safety and security analysis for cyber-physical systems. Journal of Information Security and Applications, 33, 183-196.
Gianclaudio, M., & Jędrzej, N. (2020). Vulnerable data subjects. Computer Law & Security Review, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105415
GOST (2012). GOST R 51897-2011 / ISO Guide 73: 2009. National standard of the Russian Federation. "Risk management. Terms and definitions" (approved and put into effect by the Order of Rosstandart dated November 16, 2011 N 548-st). Moscow: Standartinform.
GOST (2013). GOST R 43.0.7-2011 "Information support for equipment and operator activities. Hybrid-intellectualized human-informational interaction. General Provisions" (approved and put into effect by Rosstandart Order No. 1242-st of 13.12.2011). Moscow: Standartinform.
GOST (2016a). GOST R 60.1.2.1-2016 / ISO 10218-1: 2011. National standard of the Russian Federation. Robots and robotic devices. Safety requirements for industrial robots. Part 1: Robots (approved and put into effect by the Order of Rosstandart dated 08.11.2016 N 1624-st). Moscow: Standartinform.
GOST (2016b). GOST R 60.2.2.1-2016 / ISO 13482: 2014. National standard of the Russian Federation. Robots and robotic devices. Safety requirements for robots for personal care (approved and put into effect by Order of Rosstandart dated November 24, 2016 No. 1756-st). Moscow: Standartinform.
GOST (2018). GOST R 43.0.8-2017. National standard of the Russian Federation. Information support for technology and operator activities. Artificially intellectualized human-informational interaction. General Provisions. (approved and put into effect by the Order of Rosstandart dated July 27, 2017 No. 757-st). Moscow: Standartinform.
GOST (2019). GOST R 60.0.0.4-2019 / ISO 8373: 2012. National standard of the Russian Federation. Robots and robotic devices. Terms and definitions" (approved and put into effect by the Order of Rosstandart dated February 14, 2019 No. 31-st). Moscow: Standartinform.
GOST (2020). GOST R ISO 31000-2019 “Risk management. Principles and Guidelines" (approved and put into effect by the Order of the Federal Agency for Technical Regulation and Metrology of 10.12.2019 N 1379-st). Moscow: Standartinform.
Gurinovich, A. G., Lapina, M. A., & Lapin, A. V. (2020). Administrative and legal aspects of management risks in the economic sphere. Revista Quaestio Iuris, 13(3), 1325-1347. http://doi.org/10.12957/rqi.2020.55749
Guerra, P. C., Nöth, W., & Knoerr, V. C. de S. (2023). Empowering the Battle Against COVID-19: Exploring the Impact of Artificial Intelligence Solutions. ESG Law Review, 6(1), e01576. Retrieved from https://esglawreview.org/convergencias/article/view/1576
Head, G. L. (2004). The duality of risk. Risk Management, 51(1), 20.
ISBuzz Staff (2017, 03 March). Severe Security Vulnerabilities in Home, Business and Industrial Robots. ISBuzz News. https://www.informationsecuritybuzz.com/articles/severe-security-vulnerabilities-home-business-industrial-robots/
ISBuzz Staff (2017, 21 September). Artificial Intelligence Can Drive Ransomware Attacks. ISBuzz News. https://www.informationsecuritybuzz.com/articles/artificial-intelligence-can-drive-ransomware-attacks
Ishaani, P. (2017). Cyber security risks in Robotics. In: Detecting and Mitigating Robotic Cyber Security Risks (pp. 333-348) http://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-2154-9.ch022
Ivezic, M. (2015, 31 March). The World of Cyber-Physical Systems & the Rising Cyber-Kinetic Risks. 5G.Security. https://5g.security/cyber-kinetic/cyber-kinetic-risks/
Khabrieva, T. Ya., & Chernogor, N. N. (2020). The future is right. The legacy of academician V.S. Stepin and legal science. Moscow: Russian Academy of Sciences; Institute of Legislation and Comparative Law under the Government of the Russian Federation; INFRAM.
Kotenko, I., Parashchuk, I. B., & Saenko, I. B. (2017). Information security of cyber-physical systems: the main directions of research. Proceedings of the III interregional scientific and practical conference «Perspective directions of development of domestic information technologies» (pp. 63–65). Moscow.
Krupiy, T. (2020). A vulnerability analysis: Theorising the impact of artificial intelligence decision-making processes on individuals, society and human diversity from a social justice perspective. Computer Law & Security Review, 38. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105429
Kupriyanovskiy, V. P., Namiot, D. E., & Sinyagov, S. A. (2016). Cyber-physical systems as the basis of the digital economy. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 4(2), 18–25.
Kupriyanovsky, V. P., Klimov, A. A., Voropaev, Yu. N., Ponkin, I. V., Pokusaev, O. N., Dobrynin, A. P., & Lysogorskiy, A. A. (2020a). Digital twins based on the development of BIM technologies, connected by ontologies, 5G, IoT and mixed reality for use in infrastructure projects and IFRABIM. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8(3), 55–74.
Kupriyanovsky, V. P., Ponkin, I. V., Moreva, S. L., & Ponkin, D. I. (2020b). Disruptive technological innovation: concept, meaning and ontology. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8(8), 60–68.
Lapin, A. V. (2018). Improving the system of technical regulation as a prerequisite for the state industrial policy of growth. Administrative and municipal law, (10), 43–51.
Lapina, M. A. (2015). Theoretical and legal aspects of risk management. State and Law, (2), 35–44.
Laurence, A. (2022). The Impact of Artificial Intelligence on Cyber Security. CPO Magazine. https://www.cpomagazine.com/cyber-security/the-impact-of-artificial-intelligence-on-cyber-security/
Lee, E. A., & Seshia, S. A. (2016). Introduction to embedded systems: A cyber-physical systems approach. London: MIT Press Publ.
Li, S. (2003). Future trends and challenges of financial risk management in the digital economy. Managerial Finance, 29(5-6), 111-125. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350310768797
Luz, E. H. da, Belli , R. F., & Santos , R. C. dos. (2023). Green management: the sustainability’s path of no return in organizations . ESG Law Review, 6(1), e01571. Retrieved from https://esglawreview.org/convergencias/article/view/1574
Maggi, F., Quarta, D., Pogliani, M., Polino, M., Zanchettin, A. M., & di Milano, S. Z. P. (2017). Rogue Robots: Testing the Limits of an Industrial Robot's Security. https://documents.trendmicro.com/assets/wp/wp-industrial-robot-security.pdf
Marr, B. (2018, 19 November). Is Artificial Intelligence Dangerous? 6 AI Risks Everyone Should Know About. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/bernardmarr/2018/11/19/is-artificial-intelligence-dangerous-6-ai-risks-everyone-should-know-about/
Morhat, P. M. (2017). Artificial Intelligence: Legal View. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
Morhat, P. M. (2018a). Law and Artificial Intelligence. Moscow: Unity-Dana.
Morhat, P. M. (2018b). Legal personality of artificial intelligence units. Civil law research. Moscow: Unity-Dana.
Morhat, P. M. (2019). Law and Artificial Intelligence: Thesaurus. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2019). Implications of Artificial Intelligence for Cybersecurity: Proceedings of a Workshop. Washington (DC): The National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/25488
Neznamov, A.V., Arkhipov, V.V., Bakumenko, V.V., & Volynets, A.D. (2018). Regulation of robotics: an introduction to "robo-law". Legal aspects of the development of robotics and artificial intelligence technologies. Moscow: Infotropic Media.
Osipov, G. S., & Velichkovsky, B. M. (2022). Artificial intelligence. https://bigenc.ru/mathematics/text/2022537
Pagallo, U. (2013). Robots in the cloud with privacy: A new threat to data protection? Computer Law & Security Review, 29(5), 501-508. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2013.07.012
Paganini, P. (2015, 24 February). Cybersecurity and Artificial Intelligence: A Dangerous Mix. Infosec. https://resources.infosecinstitute.com/cybersecurity-artificial-intelligence-dangerous-mix/
Park, K.-J., Zheng, R., & Liu, X. (2012). Cyber-physical Systems. Milestones and Research Challenges. Editorial Computer Communications, 36(1), 1-7. http://doi.org/10.1016/j.comcom.2012.09.006
Ponkin, I. V. (2020). The concept of machine-readable and machine-executable law: relevance, purpose, place in RegTech, content, ontology and prospects. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 8(9), 59–69.
Ponkin, I. V., & Redkina, A. I. (2018a). Artificial Intelligence from the Point of View of Law. RUDN Journal of Law, 22(1), 91-109. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2018-22-1-91-109
Ponkin, I. V., & Redkina, A. I. (2018b). Artificial Intelligence and Intellectual Property Law. Intellectual Property. Copyright and related rights, (2), 35–44.
Ponkin, I. V., Kupriyanovskiy, V. P., Redkina, A. I., Semenova, E. M., Ponkin, D. I., & Grinko, O. V. (2019). On the question of the content of the concept and features of the ontology of the energy Internet and its legal and technological images. International Journal of Open Information Technologies, 7(8), 87–93.
Press, G. (2018, 03 December). Cybersecurity Predictions for 2019. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/gilpress/2018/12/03/60-cybersecurity-predictions-for-2019/
Putin, V. V. (2019). Message of the President of the Russian Federation to the Federal Assembly of 02/20/2019. Rossiyskaya Gazeta, no. 38.
Raab, Ch. D. (2020). Information privacy, impact assessment, and the place of ethics. Computer Law & Security Review, 37. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clsr.2020.105404
Ruchkina, G. F. (2020). Artificial intelligence, robots and robotics objects: on the theory of legal regulation in the Russian Federation. Banking Law, (1), 7–18.
Seals, T. (2018, 03 October). Artificial Intelligence: A Cybersecurity Tool for Good, and Sometimes Bad. Threatpost. https://threatpost.com/artificial-intelligence-a-cybersecurity-tool-for-good-and-sometimes-bad/137831/
Softpedia (2017, 03 May). Factory Robots Are Easy to Hack, Researchers Show. https://news.softpedia.com/news/factory-robots-are-easy-to-hack-researchers-show-515411.shtml
State Technical Commission of Russia (2000). Protection against unauthorized access to information. Part 1: Information security software. Classification according to the level of control of the absence of undeclared opportunities: Guidance document. Moscow.
Tikhomirova, Yu. A. (ed.) (2018). Legal administration in economics. Moscow: Justice.
Turganbaev, A. O. (2019). Administrative and legal support and implementation of strategic planning in public administration. Moscow: Buki Vedi.
University of Cambridge (2021). Risks from Artificial Intelligence. https://www.cser.ac.uk/research/risks-from-artificial-intelligence/
Vatamanyuk, I. V., & Yakovlev, R. N. (2019). Generalized theoretical models of cyber-physical systems. News of the South-West State University, 23(6), 161-175.
Wolf, W. (2009). Cyber-physical systems. Computer, 42(3), 88-89. https://doi.org/10.1109/MC.2009.81
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v1i73.6277
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Jurídica e-ISSN: 2316-753X
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
