ANALYSIS OF THE REGULATORY FRAMEWORK INFLUENCING CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY IN SAUDI ARABIA AND ITS EFFECTIVENESS

Abdulelah Abed ALSAHLI

Abstract


ABSTRACT

 

Objective: The purpose of the research is to analyse the legislative instruments that influences Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) practices in Saudi Arabia. An effective implementation of CSR practices in developing economies can yield to direct and indirect benefits that ultimately reach local communities. Primary regulatory framework that aims at enhancing and encouraging CSR practices has yet to be developed in Saudi Arabia. The subject matter is self-regulating by corporate entities and involves mainly soft laws rather than hard laws. The research aims to analyse the definitions and characteristics of CSR with accordance to international practices, discusses the regulatory framework of CSR, and outlines its practicality in Saudi arabia.

 

Method: The research adopts the traditional legal research methodology which aims at identifying the primary sources of law, such as legislation and case laws. It aims at understanding the position of the law on the matter concerned and allows for a further scope of analysis. Furthermore, the research utilizes the comparative approach that allows for the analysis of the hard and soft laws related to CSR to evaluate their effectiveness. Normative research methods are adopted to an interpret the relevant data and propose changes to the current regulatory framework of CSR.

 

Results And disscustion: Defining and characterising CSR is associated with complexity and vagueness and depends on contextual factors. However, the core principles of CSR include the ethical behaviour and economic contribution of corporate entities in a continuous and developmental manner that benefits the local communities and the society at large. Legislative instruments can influence and promote the application of CSR and increasing its effectiveness. International and national efforts to regulate CSR practices have developed considerably. Nonetheless, coherent legislative instruments in the form of hard laws are limited in Saudi Arabia.

 

Conclusions: Fostering and strengthening CSR practices in Saudi Arabia has been established as a necessity and a task that aligns with the Saudi Vision 2030 objectives. There are multiple incentives consisting of internal and external drivers for the introduction of CSR regulation in Saudi Arabia. It is imperative to regulate the practices of CSR through legislative instruments requires and encourages the adoption of CSR practices by businesses and corporations that conform to international guidelines, thus shifting away from the traditional self-regulatory system.

 

Keywords: corporate social responsibility, CSR, hard law, soft law, self-regulating, regualtion

  

RESUMO

 Objetivo: O objetivo da pesquisa é analisar os instrumentos legislativos que influenciam as práticas de Responsabilidade Social Corporativa (RSE) na Arábia Saudita. Uma implementação eficaz de práticas de RSE nas economias em desenvolvimento pode produzir benefícios diretos e indiretos que, em última análise, alcançam as comunidades locais. O quadro regulamentar primário que visa melhorar e incentivar as práticas de RSE ainda não foi desenvolvido na Arábia Saudita. O assunto é autorregulado por entidades corporativas e envolve principalmente leis brandas, em vez de leis rígidas. A pesquisa visa analisar as definições e características da RSE de acordo com as práticas internacionais, discute o quadro regulamentar da RSE e descreve a sua viabilidade na Arábia Saudita.

 

Método: A pesquisa adota a metodologia tradicional de pesquisa jurídica que visa identificar as fontes primárias do direito, como legislação e jurisprudência. Visa compreender a posição da lei sobre a matéria em questão e permite um maior alcance de análise. Além disso, a pesquisa utiliza a abordagem comparativa que permite a análise das leis duras e leves relacionadas à RSE para avaliar sua eficácia. São adoptados métodos de investigação normativa para interpretar os dados relevantes e propor alterações ao actual quadro regulamentar da RSE.

 

Resultados e discussão: Definir e caracterizar a RSC está associado à complexidade e imprecisão e depende de fatores contextuais. No entanto, os princípios fundamentais da RSE incluem o comportamento ético e a contribuição económica das entidades corporativas de uma forma contínua e de desenvolvimento que beneficia as comunidades locais e a sociedade em geral. Os instrumentos legislativos podem influenciar e promover a aplicação da RSE e aumentar a sua eficácia. Os esforços internacionais e nacionais para regular as práticas de RSE desenvolveram-se consideravelmente. No entanto, instrumentos legislativos coerentes sob a forma de leis rígidas são limitados na Arábia Saudita.

 

Conclusões: A promoção e o fortalecimento das práticas de RSC na Arábia Saudita foram estabelecidos como uma necessidade e uma tarefa que se alinha com os objetivos da Visão Saudita 2030. Existem múltiplos incentivos que consistem em motivadores internos e externos para a introdução da regulamentação de RSE na Arábia Saudita. É imperativo regular as práticas de RSE através de instrumentos legislativos, requer e incentiva a adopção de práticas de RSE por parte de empresas e corporações que estejam em conformidade com as directrizes internacionais, afastando-se assim do sistema tradicional de auto-regulação.

 

Palavras-chave: responsabilidade social corporativa; RSE, hard law, soft law, autorregulação, regulação


Keywords


Keywords: corporate social responsibility; CSR; hard law; soft law; self-regulating; regualtion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahmad Aminu, H., Md. Harashid, H., & Azlan, A. (2015). Corporate Social Responsibility: A Review on definitions, core characteristics and theoretical perspectives. Mediterranean Journal of Social Science, 6(4), 83–95. doi: 10.5901/mjss.2015.v6n4p83

Alavi, H., Hąbek, P., & Cierna, H. (2016). Corporate social responsibility and self-regulation. MM Science Journal (4), 1121–1126. doi: 10.17973/MMSJ.2016_10_201681.

An, N. B. (2023). The Role of Hard Law and Soft Law in Developing CSR. In N. B. An and P. T. Anh (Eds) Laws on Corporate Social Responsibility and the Developmental Trend in Vietnam. Singapore: Springer.

Ananzeh, H. (2024). The economic consequence of corporate philanthropic donations: Evidence from Jordan. Journal of Business and Socio-economic Development, 4(1), 37–48. doi: 10.1108/JBSED-10-2022-0112

Beal, B. D. (2013) Corporate Social Responsibility: Definition, Core Issues, and Recent Developments. United States, SAGE Publications.

Blowfield, M., & Frynas, J. G. (2005). Setting New Agendas: Critical Perspectives on Corporate Social Responsibility in the Developing World. International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944), 81(3), 499–513. doi: 10.1111/j.1468-2346.2005.00465.x

Carroll, A. B. (2016). A. B. Carroll’s pyramid of CSR: taking another look. International Journal of Corporate Social Responsibility, 1(3) doi: 10.1186/s40991-016-0004-6

Carroll, A. B. (1991). The pyramid of corporate social responsibility: Toward the moral management of organizational stakeholders. Business Horizons, 34(4), 39–48.

Carroll, A. B. (1979). A Three-Dimensional Conceptual Model of Corporate Performance. The Academy of Management Review, 4(4), 497–505. doi: 10.2307/257850

Cerioni, L. (2008). The success of the company in s. 172(1) of the UK companies act 2006: Towards an 'enlightened directors' primacy' ? Retrieved from https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/334289.pdf

Cicero & Bernay – YouGov MENA CSR Survey Report. (2020). Retrieved from https://cbpr.me/csr/Cicero_and_Bernay_x_YouGov_First_Annual_MENA_CSR_Survey_Report_2020_English.pdf

CSRC, Official website of the Social Responsibility Committee. https://csr.gov.sa/home/page/social_responsibility_committee

Davarnejad, L. (2011). In the shado In the shadow of soft law: The handling of corporate social responsibility disputes under the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Journal of Dispute Resolution, n. 2, p. 351-385 w of soft law: The handling of corporate social responsibility disputes under the OECD guidelines for multinational enterprises. Journal of Dispute Resolution, n. 2, 351-385. Retrieved from: https://scholarship.law.missouri.edu/jdr/vol2011/iss2/6

Doh, J., Husted, B. W., & Yang, X. (2016). Guest Editors’ Introduction: Ethics, Corporate Social Responsibility, and Developing Country Multinationals. Business Ethics Quarterly, 26(3), 301–315. Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/43973448

Ediagbonya, V. (2017). The Scope of Director’s Duties Under the Provision of Section 172 of the Companies Act of United Kingdom. Retrieved from http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2982033

Freeman, R. E., & Dmytriyev, S. (2017). Corporate Social Responsibility and Stakeholder Theory: Learning From Each Other. Symphonya. Emerging Issues in Management, (1), 7–15. doi: 10.4468/2017.1.02freeman.dmytriyev

Gond, J., Kang, N., & Moon, J. (2011). The government of self-regulation: on the comparative dynamics of corporate social responsibility. Economy and Society, 40(4), 640–671. doi: 10.1080/03085147.2011.607364

Gotsis, G., & Grimani, K. (2015). Virtue theory and organizational behavior: An integrative framework. Journal of Management Development, 34(10), 1288–1309. doi: 10.1108/JMD-02-2015-0021

Grossman, H. A. (2005). Refining the role of the corporation : the impact of corporate social responsibility on shareholder primacy theory. Deakin Law Review, 10(2), 572–596. doi: 10.21153/dlr2005vol10no2art293

Idowu, S. O., & Leal Filho, W. (2008). Global Practices of Corporate Social Responsibility. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Ismail, M. (2009). Corporate social responsibility and its role in community development: An international perspective. Journal of International social research, 2(9). Retrieved from: https://www.sosyalarastirmalar.com/articles/corporate-social-responsibility-and-its-role-in-community-development-an-international-perspective.pdf

Kamal, Y. (2021). Stakeholders expectations for CSR-related corporate governance disclosure: evidence from a developing country. Asian Review of Accounting, 29(2), 97–127. doi:10.1108/ARA-04-2020-0052

Kingdom of Saudi Arabia Vision 2030. (2016). Retrieved from: https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/media/rc0b5oy1/saudi_vision203.pdf

Księżak, P. (2017). The Benefits from CSR for a Company and Society. Journal of Corporate Responsibility and Leadership, 3(4), 53–65. doi: 10.12775/JCRL.2016.023

Lin, L. (2020). Mandatory Corporate Social Responsibility? Legislative Innovation and Judicial Application in China. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 68(3), 576–615, doi: 10.1093/ajcl/avaa025

OECD (2023). OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises on Responsible Business Conduct, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/81f92357-en.

Shanmugam, V. P., Champramary, R., & Veeraraghavan, R. (2017). An Explorative Study on Mandatory CSR Spending with Reference to Section 135 of Companies Act, 2013. doi: 10.2139/ssrn.2998992

Rahim, M. M. (2013). Legal Regulation of Corporate Social Responsibility: A Meta-Regulation Approach of Law for Raising CSR in a Weak Economy. Germany: Springer Berlin Heidelberg.

Rodriguez-Gomez, S., Arco-Castro, M. L.; Lopez-Perez, M. V., & Rodríguez-Ariza, L. (2020). Where Does CSR Come from and Where Does It Go? A Review of the State of the Art. Administrative Sciences., 10(60). doi: 10.3390/admsci10030060.

Samy, M., Odemilin, G., & Bampton, R. (2010). Corporate social responsibility: A strategy for sustainable business success. An analysis of 20 selected British companies. Corporate Governance, 10(2), 203–217. doi: 10.1108/14720701011035710

Schnepp, G., & Bowen, H. (1954). Social Responsibilities of the Businessman. The American Catholic Sociological Review, 15(42). doi: 10.2307/3708003

Servaes, H., & Tamayo, A. (2013). The Impact of Corporate Social Responsibility on Firm Value: The Role of Customer Awareness. Management Science, 59(5), 1045–1061. doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1120.1630

Sheehy, B. (2015). Defining CSR: Problems and Solutions. Journal of Business Ethics, 131, 625–648. doi: 10.1007/s10551-014-2281-x

Visser, W. (2009). Corporate Social Responsibility in Developing Countries. In A. Crane,, The Oxford Handbook of Corporate Social Responsibility, 473–500 doi: 10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199211593.003.0021

Weber, M. (2008). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A company-level measurement approach for CSR. European Management Journal, 26(4), 247–261. doi:

Wirba, A. V. (2023). Corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of government in promoting CSR. Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 1-27., doi: 10.1007/s13132-023-01185-0

World Economic Forum & The Prince of Wales International Business Leaders Forum (2002). Global Corporate Citizenship. The Leadership Challenge for CEOs and Boards. Retrieved from: https://www.griequity.com/resources/integraltech/GRIMarket/WEFGCGCEOstatement.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v3i80.6894

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Revista Jurídica e-ISSN: 2316-753X

Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181

Licença Creative Commons

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.