LEGAL OBSTACLES TO FULFILLING THE RIGHTS OF COMPENSATION OF PUBLIC MOTOR VEHICLE PASSENGERS IN INDONESIA

Syamsuddin BACO; Nurhayati Sutan NOKOE

doi:10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v4i82.7139

LEGAL OBSTACLES TO FULFILLING THE RIGHTS OF COMPENSATION OF PUBLIC MOTOR VEHICLE PASSENGERS IN INDONESIA

Syamsuddin BACO, Nurhayati Sutan NOKOE

Resumo

Objective: This study aims to explain the factors that inhibit the fulfillment of passenger compensation rights from carriers. Second, the gap between the norms of passenger rights and carrier obligations must be bridged by organizing passenger transportation by public motorized vehicles in Indonesia.

Method: Doctrinal legal research uses a statutory and conceptual approach, namely, reviewing and analyzing primary, secondary, and empirical legal materials. This approach is carried out by analyzing the philosophical and sociological foundations of primary legal materials. In contrast, the conceptual approach is carried out by analyzing legal concepts and principles.

Result: The results of this research contribute to the development of a system for fulfilling carrier responsibilities to passengers through a fair general motor vehicle passenger insurance program, harmonizing carrier responsibility insurance norms into the general motor vehicle passenger insurance guarantee system, and forming the legal culture of society to understand and be aware of their rights as passengers of public motorized vehicles.

Conclusion: There is no regulation of the amount of compensation, so carrier liability insurance cannot yet be implemented. The payment of compensation for passenger accident funds is misunderstood because it is considered to fulfill the carrier's responsibility. Although the carrier's liability insurance has not yet been implemented, passengers still have the right to sue the carrier for compensation through a breach of contract lawsuits. Consequently, passengers can claim material and immaterial compensation.

Keywords: motorized vehicles; passenger compensation; passenger rights; public transportation

Objetivo: Este estudo visa explicar os fatores que inibem o cumprimento dos direitos de indenização dos passageiros pelas transportadoras. Em segundo lugar, a lacuna entre as normas dos direitos dos passageiros e as obrigações das transportadoras deve ser colmatada através da organização do transporte de passageiros em veículos públicos motorizados na Indonésia.

Métodos: A pesquisa jurídica doutrinária utiliza uma abordagem estatutária e conceitual, ou seja, revisando e analisando materiais jurídicos primários, secundários e empíricos. Esta abordagem é realizada através da análise dos fundamentos filosóficos e sociológicos dos materiais jurídicos primários. Em contrapartida, a abordagem conceitual é realizada por meio da análise de conceitos e princípios jurídicos.

Resultados: Os resultados desta pesquisa contribuem para o desenvolvimento de um sistema para cumprir as responsabilidades da transportadora para com os passageiros por meio de um programa justo de seguro geral de passageiros de veículos automotores, harmonizando as normas de seguro de responsabilidade da transportadora no sistema de garantia de seguro geral de passageiros de veículos automotores e formando a cultura jurídica da sociedade compreender e ter consciência dos seus direitos enquanto passageiros de veículos públicos motorizados.

Conclusão: Não há regulamentação do valor da indenização, portanto o seguro de responsabilidade civil da transportadora ainda não pode ser implementado. O pagamento de indemnizações por acidentes de passageiros é mal compreendido porque se considera que cumpre a responsabilidade da transportadora. Embora o seguro de responsabilidade civil da transportadora ainda não tenha sido implementado, os passageiros ainda têm o direito de processar a transportadora para obter compensação através de ações judiciais por quebra de contrato. Consequentemente, os passageiros podem reclamar indemnizações materiais e imateriais.

Palavras-chave: veículos motorizados; indenização de passageiros; direitos dos passageiros; transporte público.

Palavras-chave

motorized vehicles; passenger compensation; passenger rights; public transportation

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências

ABDULKADIR MUHAMMAD. (1999). Hukum Asuransi Indonesia. PT Citra Aditya Bakti.

ABOLVARDI, M., SHARIFI, N., RAHMANIAN, K., & RAHMANIAN, V. (2023). Human Risk Factors for Severity of Injuries in Urban and Suburban Traffic Accidents in Southern Iran: An Insight from Police Data. International Journal of High Risk Behaviors and Addiction, 11(4). https://doi.org/10.5812/ijhrba-129419

AUKSĖ, E., SLAVINSKIENĖ, J., ŠEIBOKAITĖ, L., MARKŠAITYTĖ, R., & SULLMAN, M. (2022). Differences in the perceived justice of penalties for road traffic offences between Lithuanian offenders and non-offenders. PLoS ONE, 17(6 June), 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269239

BADAN PUSAT STATISTIK. (2022). Jumlah Kecelakaan, Korban Mati, Luka Berat, Luka Ringan, dan Kerugian Materi. In Badan Pusat Statistik. https://doi.org/Jumlah Kecelakaan, Korban Mati, Luka Berat, Luka Ringan, dan Kerugian Materi

BERNARD. L. T, SIMANJUNTAK, Y. N, and HAGE, M. Y. (2006). Teori Hukum: Strategi Tertib manusia Lintas Ruang dan Generasi (Cetakan Pe). CV.Kita. BIENENSTOCK, S. (2019). The deterrent effect of French liability law: An example of abusive contract terms. Revue d'Economie Politique, 129(2), 205–234. https://doi.org/10.3917/redp.292.0205

CHRISTIAWAN, R & WULANDARI, R. (2023). Hukum KOntrak Bisnis (Kurniawan Ahmad (Ed.) ; Cetakan Pe). Sinar Grafika.

CONSUNJI, R., ALINIER, G., ABEID, A. F., MURRAY, L. M., FILDES, B. (2022). Recommendations to improve young and novice driver safety in Qatar. Journal of Emergency Medicine, Trauma and Acute Care, 2022(2). https://doi.org/10.5339/jemtac.2022.4

DEBNATH, A. K., HAWORTH, N., BLACKMAN, R. (2021). Risk to workers or vehicle damage: What causes drivers to slow in work zones?. Traffic Injury Prevention, 22(2), 177–181. https://doi.org/10.1080/15389588.2021.1878354

DISASSA, A. & KEBU, H. (2019). Psychosocial factors are predictors of risky driving behavior and accident involvement among drivers in the Oromia Region, Ethiopia. Heliyon, 5(6), e01876. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2019.e01876

FITRI, NUR, HILAL, T. S. S. (2023). Faktor-Faktor yang Berhubungan Dengan Kecelakaan Lalu Lintas pada Pengendara Sepeda Motor Roda Dua di Kota Jambi. Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian, 3(10): 7877–7882.

GUERRA, A., LUPPI, B., PARISI, F. (2022). Do presumptions of negligence incentivize optimal precautions?. European Journal of Law and Economics, 54(3), 349–368. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10657-022-09737-6

GUPTA, M., VELAGA, N. R., & OVIEDO-TRESPALACIOS, O. (2024). Understanding risky driving among motorized two-wheeler drivers: The role of time-related anxiety and impunctuality. Transport Policy, 145(October 2023): 199–210. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2023.10.022

HAIL, Y. & MCQUAID, R. (2021). Concept of fairness in relation to female transport users. Sustainability,13(5). https://doi.org/10.3390/su13052919

HELLMAN, D. (2018). Indirect Discrimination and the Duty to Avoid Compounding Injustice. Foundations of Indirect Discrimination Law, Hart Publishing Company, 2017-2053. September. https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509912551.ch-005 JADDOU, D. O., MAROUF, H. A. (2023). Legal Restrictions on the Judge's Authority To Assess Compensation for the Supposed Damage in Civil Liability. Revista de Gestao Social e Ambiental, 17(5), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.24857/rgsa.v17n5-026jurnaladm,+Amad+Sudiro+-+Tanggung+(pdf.io).pdf. (n.d.).

LEGOWO, M. I. (2019). Prinsip Tanggung Jawab Pengangkut Dan Asuransi Ganti Rugi Terhadap Korban Kecelakaan Penumpang Umum Di Jalan Raya. Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 17(1), 47–57. https://doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v17i1.1279

LIAU, T. (2021). Privacy: Rights, Standing, and the Road Not Taken. Oxford Journal of Legal Studies, 41(3), 803–832. https://doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqab004

LIPPERT-RASMUSSEN, K. (2023). Is there a duty not to compound injustice?. Law and Philosophy, 42(2), 93–113. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10982-022-09460-y

MARTINUSSEN, L. M., MØLLER, M., PRATO, C. G., & HAUSTEIN, S. (2017). How indicative is a self-reported driving behavior profile of police registered traffic law offences?. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 99, 1–5. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2016.10.031

MASHUDI, H. & ALI, M. C. (1998). Hukum Asuransi. CV Mandar maju. NURBAITI, S. (2013). Asuransi Tanggung Jawab Pengangkut Kepada Penumpang dalam Penyelenggaraan Pengangkutan di Jalan. http://www.karyailmiah.trisakti.ac.id/uploads/kilmiah/dosen/DISERTASI_SITI_NURBAITII.PDF

PAMURAHARJO, H., KUNTADI, C., & AMALIA, D. (2023). Prinsip “Presumption of Liability” Dikaitkan dengan Release and Discharge Sebagai Persyaratan Pembayaran Kompensasi Meninggalnya Penumpang Akibat Kecelakaan Pesawat Udara Penerbangan dalam Negeri. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora Dan Politik, 3(2), 62–75. https://doi.org/10.38035/jihhp.v3i2.1471

PAPADIMITRIOU, E., POOYAN AFGHARI, A., TSELENTIS, D., & VAN GELDER, P. (2022). Road-safety-II: Opportunities and barriers for an enhanced road safety vision. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 174(March), 106723. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2022.106723

PRAKOSO, D. & MURTIKA, I K. (2004). Hukum Asuransi Indonesia. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. SÁNCHEZ HERNÁNDEZ, L. C. (2021). La responsabilidad objetiva por actividades peligrosas en Colombia Análisis crítico de la sentencia CSJ-SC2111 de 2021. Revista de Derecho Privado, 42, 377–391. https://doi.org/10.18601/01234366.42.14

SNIJDERS, J. H. & H. (2010). The Netherlands New Civil Code: Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata Belanda yang Baru. National Legal Reform Program.

SRI REJEKI HARTONO. (1997). Hukum Asuransi & Perusahaan Asuransi (Cetakan ke). Sinar Grafika.

SUMIARNI, M. E., & CHRISTIANI, T. A. (2023). Law No 4 Of 2023 Reviewed From The Perspective Of Insurance Customer Protection. Journal of Law and Sustainable Development, 11(12), e2593. https://doi.org/10.55908/sdgs.v11i12.2593 SYAIFUDDIN, M. (2012). Hukum Kontrak; Memahami Kontrak Dalam Perspektif Filsafat,Teori, Dogmatik, dan Praktik Hukum ( Seri Pengayaan Hukum Perikatan) (Cetakan I). Send Maju.

TAŞKIN, M. (2023). Inherent Vice of the Goods Exception in the frame of Volcafe Ltd and Others v. Compania Sud Americana de Vapores SA” Decision: An Assessment under Turkish-German Law. Annales de La Faculte de Droit d'Istanbul, 73, 121–133. https://doi.org/10.26650/annales.2023.73.0003

TIMMERMANS, C., ALHAJYASEEN, W., REINOLSMANN, N., NAKAMURA, H., & SUZUKI, K. (2019). Traffic safety culture of professional drivers in the State of Qatar. IATSS Research, 43(4), 286–296. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iatssr.2019.03.004

UTSMAN, S. (2010). Menuju Penegakan Hukum Responsif (Cetakan II). Pustaka Pelajar. VICKERMAN, R. (2024). The transport problem: The need for consistent policies on pricing and investment. Transport Policy, 149: 49–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2024.02.009

WATSON-BROWN, N., SCOTT-PARKER, B., & SENSERRICK, T. (2019). Association between higher-order driving instruction and risky driving behaviours: Exploring the mediating effects of a self-regulated safety orientation. Accident Analysis and Prevention, 131:275–283. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aap.2019.07.005

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.26668/revistajur.2316-753X.v4i82.7139