DEVELOPMENT OF NEW FORMS OF SPATIAL-INTERACTION NETWORKING: RESEARCH AND EDUCATIONAL CENTERS

ELENA ALEXANDROVNA LAVRINENKO, YANA YURIEVNA BONDAREVA, YULIA VITALIEVNA SOLODYANKINA

Abstract


Background: The article considers the features, types, and forms of the spatial interaction network that arise during forming and functioning of world-class scientific and educational centers. Aim: The authors determine development scenarios of new forms of spatial-interaction network, which involve interaction within the framework of a research and educational center, and the development of regional, interregional spatial interaction network between research and educational centers in priority areas of the development of the science and technology complex of Russia. Results: A presented model of the spatial interaction network within the framework of research and educational centers assumes the active participation of society in the innovative activities of research and educational centers through social networks and public associations. The features of regional and interregional spatial-interaction networks are considered, and the effectiveness of these spatial network collaborations is evaluated. Conclusion: A proposed model of the spatial interaction network of research and educational centers consists of three main blocks of the spatial interaction network of research and educational centers which contribute to the development of a single innovation space and the spread of innovations in the country. 


Keywords


Innovative structures; Network structures; Research and educational centers; Spatial-interaction network; Socio-economic system

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albarra ́N, P., Crespo, J.A., Ortun ̃o, I., & Ruiz-Castillo, J. (2010). A comparison of the scientific performance of the U.S. and the European Union at the turn of the 21st century. Scientometrics, 85(1), 329-344. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-010-0223-7

Antonov, A.G. & Pomogaeva, K.Yu. (2019). Innovative spiral. Moscow Economic Journal, 5.

Audretsch, D.B., Hu ̈lsbeck, M., & Lehman, E.E. (2012). Regional competitiveness, university spillovers, and entrepreneurial activity. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 587-601. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9332-9

Audretsch, D.B., Keilbach, M.C., & Lehmann, E.E. (2006). Entrepreneurship and economic growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191-1202.

Azagra-Caro, J.M., Archontakis, F., & Yegros-Yegros, A. (2007). In which regions do universities patent and publish more? Scientometrics, 70(2), 251-266. http://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-007-0202-9

Babu, A.R. & Singh, Y.P. (1998). Determinants of research productivity. Scientometrics, 43(3), 309-329. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02457402

Benoit, K. & Marsh, M. (2009). A relative impact ranking of political studies in Ireland. The Economic and Social Review, 40(3), 269-298.

Boardman, C. & Gray, D. (2010). The new science and engineering management: Cooperative research centers as government policies, industry strategies, and organizations. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 35(5), 445-459.

Bowers, M.R., & Alon, I. (2010). An exploratory comparison of US and international academically based entrepreneurship centers. International Journal of Business and Globalization, 5(2), 115-134. http://doi.org/10.1504/IJBG.2010.034391

Camagni, R., Huggins, R., & Thompson, P. (eds.) (2017). Territorial capital, competitiveness, and regional development. In: Handbook of Regions and Competitiveness: Contemporary Theories and Perspectives on Economic Development (pp. 232-244). Edward Elgar Publishing.

Carayannis, E. & Grigoroudis, E. (2016). A four-stage spiral of innovation and smart specialization: The production of knowledge and national competitiveness. Foresight, 1, 31-42.

Chernova, O.A. & Klimuk, V.V. (2019). The concept of four-stage spiral strategies of smart specialization of industrial development. Natural Sciences and Humanities Research. (EGI), 25(3).

Finkle, T.A. (2005). A review of trends in the market for entrepreneurship faculty from 1989-2004. In frontiers of entrepreneurship research, 2005. In: Zahra, S. et al. (eds.). Proceedings of the 25th Annual Entrepreneurship Research Conference. Wellesley, MA: AMBCE.

Finkle, T.A. (2007). A comparative analysis of US versus international entrepreneurship centers. Proceedings of the 21st annual national United States association for small business and entrepreneurship conference, 125.

Finkle, T.A., Kuratko, D.F., & Goldsby, M.G. (2006). An examination of entrepreneurship centers in the United States: A national survey. Journal of Small Business Management, 44(2), 184-206. http://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-627X.2006.00163.x

Gitman, M.B., Danilov, A.N., Stolbov, V.Yu., & Yuzhakov, A.A. (2012). Model of networking cooperation between universities in the training of highly qualified personnel. Univ. exercise: Practice and Analysis, 3, 69–73.

Granovetter, M. (2009). The strength of weak connections. Economic Sociology, 4.

Gritsenko, V.A., Gumenyuk, I.S., & Belov, N.S. (2013). Spatial study of network interaction in the Visla Bay region using geoinformation systems. Baltic Region, 4.

Inshakov, O.V. & Frolov, D.P. (2007). The institutionality of space in the concept of spatial economy. Spatial Economy, 1, 5-21.

Junteng, J. & Benson, A.R. (2019). Random spatial network models for core-periphery structure. Proceedings of the Twelfth ACM International Conference on Web Search and Data Mining (WSDM '19). Association for Computing Machinery, New York, NY, USA, 366-374. https://doi.org/10.1145/3289600.3290976

Katukov, D.D., Malygin, V.E., & Smorodinskaya, N.V. (2012) The institutional environment of the globalized economy: The development of network interactions. Moscow: Institute of Economics of the Russian Academy of Sciences.

Katz, J.A. (1991). The institution and infrastructure of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(3), 85-102. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500309

Kocheshkova, L.O. (2014). Experience and prospects of integration of science and education (in the format of research and educational center). Problems of Territory Development, 6(74).

Koroleva, N.N., Vershinin, I.V., & Grishakina, E.G. (2019). Intensive course "Island 10-22": REC: from idea to implementation. Management of Science and Scientometrics. 3.

Krevsky, I.G., Glotova, T.V., & Matyukin, S.V. (2013). Functional modeling of the network interaction environment of universities, enterprises, and innovators. Fundamental Research, 10(part 11), 2427-2430.

Lavrinenko, E.A., Kalugin, V.A., Bondareva, Y.Y., Borzenkova, N.S., & Polevoy, I.N. (2019). Proactive monitoring system for investment projects. Mathematical support Compusoft, 8(6), 3171-3175.

Martinez-Moyano, I.J. (2006). Exploring the dynamics of collaboration in inter-organizational settings. In: Schuman, S. (ed.). Creating a Culture of Collaboration. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Sandberg, W.R. & Gatewood, E.J. (1991). A profile of entrepreneurship research centers: Orientations, interests, activities, and resources. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 15(3), pp. 11-24. https://doi.org/10.1177/104225879101500302

Savchenko, E.S., Pavlova, O.A., & Zhuravleva, E.V. (2020) World-class research and educational center "Innovative solutions in the agribusiness" as a driver of regional economic development. Achievements of science and technology in agribusiness, 9.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i36.5930

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Bookmark and Share


Brazilian Journal of Law and International Relations e-ISSN: 2316-2880

Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brazil). CEP 80.220-181