Ocultar
Exibir todos
Enviar artigo via e-mail ANALYSIS OF THE CORRELATION BETWEEN THE CONCEPTS OF ‘PREVENTION’, ‘WARNING’, ‘SUPPRESSION’ AND ‘PREVENTION OF CRIME’
Resumo
The article deals with the problem of resolving the concepts of ‘prevention’, ‘warning’, ‘suppression’ and ‘prevention’ of crimes within the framework of operational search activities (OSA). The authors focus on the fact that in modern legal science and law enforcement practice there is no single position on the content of these terms, which creates legal uncertainty in matters of preventive activities of operational units of internal affairs bodies. Based on the analysis of scientific works of Ukrainian and foreign researchers, the author highlights various approaches to the interpretation of the concepts characterising the activities of operational units for combating crime. The authors note that scholars use the terms ‘prevention’, ‘warning’ and ‘suppression’ interchangeably, but their essence has different emphases. For example, prevention involves the elimination of the causes and conditions of criminal behaviour, prevention covers measures to prevent a particular person from committing a crime, and suppression means active intervention of law enforcement agencies at the stage of implementation of the intent to commit a crime. With a view to eliminating theoretical knowledge, the article offers the author's own concept of the relationship between these concepts. It is based on the distinction between the stages of development of a criminal event, which allows for a more precise expansion of the role of each of the preventive measures within the framework of operational and investigative activities. also, three main stages of preventive activities are identified: preceding a crime (prevention), the stage of formation of a criminal intent (prevention, which is divided into prevention and termination) and post-facto response (detection and prosecution). Thus, the article contributes to the development of the theoretical foundations of criminal law prevention and operational and investigative activities.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
Bandurka, O. M. (2002). Guarantees of legality in conducting operative and investigative activities. In O. M. Bandurka (Ed.), Operative and Investigative Activities: Textbook for Higher Educational Institutions of the Ministry of Internal Affairs (Vol. 1). Kharkiv: Ministry of Internal Affairs of Ukraine, National University of Internal Affairs.
Bazhanov, M. I. (1992). Criminal Law of Ukraine: General Part. Dnipropetrovsk: Porohy.
Klyuyev, O. (2005). Differentiation between preventive and precautionary activities of internal affairs bodies. Law of Ukraine, (3), 98–101.
Kondratiev, Y. Y. (2004). Theoretical, Legal, and Operative-Tactical Foundations of Crime Prevention by Criminal Police Units: Monograph. Kyiv: National Academy of Internal Affairs of Ukraine.
Kyrychenko, O. V. (2012). Criminal-law prevention of crimes against public safety. Bulletin of Zaporizhzhia Law Institute of the State University of Internal Affairs, (2), 247–253.
Melnyk, N. I., & Khavroniuk, M. I. (Eds.). (2004). Scientific and Practical Commentary on the Criminal Code of Ukraine. Kyiv: A.S.K. Publishing.
Navrotskyi, V. O. (2006). Fundamentals of Criminal Law Qualification: Study Guide. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter
Safronov, S. O. (2002). Preventive activities of the investigator in the internal affairs bodies of Ukraine. Law of Ukraine, (2), 82–86.
Smiyan, L. S., & Nikitin, Y. V. (Eds.). (2010). Criminology: Textbook. Kyiv: National Academy of Management.
Tutida, A. Y., Rossetto, C. R., Santos, R. C. dos, & Mazon, G. (2022). Digital.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i48.8075
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
