Ocultar
Mostrar todos
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico 
BIOLAW, HUMAN RIGHTS AND BIOETHICS: NEEDS AND CHALLENGES IN THE CONTEMPORARY CONTEXTA
Resumen
Increasingly and with greater frequency, issues related to the biolegal order are being heard before the courts of justice; a fact that requires a high degree of scientific, ethical and legal knowledge. For this reason, the present work is framed in the discursive development and elements of comparative legal methods to deal with the similarities and controversies arising in the field of biolaw and bioethics in order to delimit the field of action and scope. The analysis of biolaw is assumed from the juridical model and its nexus with human rights. The rationality of current scientific-technical contributions, whose contributions are transcendental, is also discussed. Within the applicability, the discourse is extended on a critical issue such as the right to a dignified death or the power to extend life, where different positions in favor and against are exposed, recognizing the importance of the recognition of bio-rights.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
AGRAWAL, S. (2021). Human Rights and the City: A View From Canada. Journal of the American Planning Association, 87(1), 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1080/01944363.2020.1775680
AIZENBERG, M. (2019). Palliative Cares as Human Rights: A Justification in the Light of Biolaw. In: Valdés, E., Lecaros, J. (eds) Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century. International Library of Ethics, Law, and the New Medicine, 78. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_20
ARAYA-GONZÁLES, M. D. L. Á. (2023). Vivir con dignidad el proceso de la muerte: una mirada desde el bioderecho. SIWÔ' Revista de Teología/Revista de Estudios Sociorreligiosos, 16(1), 1-19. https://doi.org/10.15359/siwo.16-1.5
COLUSSI, I. A. (2019). Biolaw and ‘the dual-use dilemma’: The freedom of scientific research in relationship with ‘traditional’and emerging sciences and technologies. In Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century: Building Answers for New Questions, 78, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_16
EA, S., & PIRES DE CAMPOS, C. E. (2021). Bioethics and Biolaw in the Vaccine against COVID 19 in Brazil. Annals of Bioethics & Clinical Applications, 4(3), 1-3. 10.23880/abca-16000201
FACHIN, M. G., & PIOVESAN, F. (2021). Implementation of the recommendations of the Inter-American Commission on Human Rights in the Brazilian constitutionalism: proposals and perspectives. UNIO–EU Law Journal, 7(1), 96-119. https://doi.org/10.21814/unio.7.1.3577
FANNI, S. (2021). Theorizing an enhancement of the protection and of the justiciability of biorights in the European Union. Ius et Scientia, 7(1), 204-249. https://dx.doi.org/10.12795/IETSCIENTIA
GOUVÊA, G. G., & DEVAL, R. A. (2018). O direito de morrer e a dignidade da pessoa humana. Revista CEJ, 22(75), 51-58.
HORODOVENKO, V. V., PASHKOV, V. M., & UDOVYKA, L. G. (2020). International legal instruments in the field of bioethics and their impact on protection of human rights. Wiadomości Lekarskie, 73(7), 1554-1560. https://doi.org/10.36740/WLek202007144
MACHADO-STURZA, J., & TONEL, R. (2019). The fundamental human right to health: the conjuncture life and death through a sociojuridical reflection on the phenomenon of suicide. Revista Thesis Juris, 8(2), 227-243. https://doi.org/10. https://doi.org/10.5585/rtj.v8i2.13706
RAGNI, C. H. I. A. R. A. (2019). Consenso informato e “fine vita” nell’ordinamento internazionale: biodiritto, diritti fondamentali e tutela della dignità umana. Notizie Di Politeia, 35(133), 164-172. https://hdl.handle.net/2434/655424
RENDTORFF, J. D., & KEMP, P. (2019). Four ethical principles in European bioethics and biolaw: autonomy, dignity, integrity and vulnerability. In Biolaw and policy in the twenty-first century: Building answers for new questions, 78, 33-40. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_16
RENDTORFF, J. D. (2021). From Philosophy of Technology to Bioethics and Biolaw: Challenges to Peter Kemp’s Ethics of the Irreplaceable. Eco-ethica. https://doi.org/10.5840/ecoethica202131532
ROMANOVSKIY, G. B., & ROMANOVSKAYA, O. V. (2021). Human rights and modern biomedicine: problems and perspectives. RUDN Journal of Law, 25(1), 14-31. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2337-2021-25-1-14-31
SALCEDO HERNÁNDEZ, J. R. (2020). Biolaw as global tool for Human Rights protection (Pro Human Biolaw). Bioderecho, 10, 1-6. https://doi.org/10.6018/bioderecho.435421
TEN OEVER, N. (2019). Productive contestation, civil society, and global governance: Human rights as a boundary object in ICANN. Policy & Internet, 11(1), 37-60. https://doi.org/10.1002/poi3.172
TEREC-VLAD, L. (2021). Ethics of Care as a Legitimizing Structure from the Perspective of Transhumanism. Eastern-European Journal of Medical Humanities and Bioethics, 5(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.18662/eejmhb/5.1/32
TRAVIESO, J. A., FERRARO, A. V., TRIKOZ, E. N., & GULYAEVA, E. E. (2021). Bioethical Aspects of Human Rights in Modern Latin America. Kutafin Law Review, 8(1), 85-98. https://doi.org/10.17803/2313-5395.2021.1.15.085-098
VALDÉS, E. (2019). Towards a new conception of biolaw. Biolaw and policy in the twenty-first century: Building answers for new questions, (pp. 41-58). Springer Nature Switzerland. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3
VALDÉS, E. (2021). Biolaw: originis, doctrine and juridical applications on the biosciencies. In Biolaw and Policy in the Twenty-First Century: Building Answers for New Questions, 78, 239-255. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-05903-3_16
WIDJIASTUTI, A., WARKA, M., SUHARTONO, S., & HUFRON, H. (2020). Legal Protection of Patients Participants of Health Social Guarantee in Human Rights Perspective. International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding, 7(10), 165-170. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i10.2135
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v6i39.6296
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
