Ocultar
Mostrar todos
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico ONTOLOGY OF THE SOURCES OF RUSSIAN CIVIL PROCEDURAL LAW
Resumen
Background: In the Russian doctrine, as well as in the international legal doctrine, there are different points of view regarding the sources of law. To date, no unified concept of the external form of civil procedure law has been developed. In the last decade, integration processes between the two families of law – the Anglo-Saxon and the Continental – have intensified at the international level, which has effectively called into question the previous modus vivendi regarding the divergence of sources between the legal families. Purpose: the study aims to reveal the ontology of the essence of the sources of civil procedural law, examine the current problems of the institute of the sources of law, and identify trends in the development of the institute of the sources of law in Russia. Methods: the problem of the study is disclosed from the standpoint of general scientific research methods (systemic, theoretical, and historical analysis) and the specialized methods of comparative legal science, logical and technical-legal analysis, concretization, and interpretation. Results: the authors explore and identify the gnoseological characteristics of the sources of procedural law in Russia in their historical context, compare the sources of procedural law in Russia with those in other countries, demonstrate the relationship of such concepts as judicial precedent and judicial discretion, and describe the impact of constitutional changes in Russia in 2020 on the institute of the sources of law.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
Bogdanova, D.E. (2015). Evoliutsiia grazhdansko-pravovoi otvetstvennosti s pozitsii spravedlivosti: sravnitelno-pravovoi aspekt: monografiia [Evolution of civil-law liability from a position of justice: a comparative-legal aspect: Monograph]. Moscow: Prospekt.
Bogdanovskaia, I.Iu. (2013). Kontseptsiia sudeiskogo normotvorchestva v pravovoi doktrine stran obshchego prava [The concept of judicial rulemaking in the legal doctrine of common law countries]. Sovremennoe pravo, 11, 9-14.
Bülow, O. (2019). Uchenie o protsessualnykh vozrazheniiakh i protsessualnye predposylki [The doctrine of procedural objections and procedural prerequisites]. D.Kh. Valeev (Ed.). Moscow: Statut.
Cross, R. (1985). Pretsedent v angliiskom prave [Precedent in English law]. Moscow: Yurid. lit.
David, R., & Jauffret-Spinosi, C. (2009). Osnovnye pravovye sistemy sovremennosti [The major legal systems of our time]. Moscow: Mezhdunarodnye otnosheniia.
Gadzhiev, G.A. (2013). Ontologiia prava (kriticheskoe issledovanie iuridicheskogo kontsepta deistvitelnosti) [Ontology of law (critical study of the legal concept of actuality)]. Moscow: Norma.
Golmsten, A.Kh. (1913). Russkii grazhdanskii protsess: uchebnik [Russian civil procedure: Textbook]. St. Petersburg: Tip. M. Merkusheva.
Kobzarenko, E.M. (2020). Ogranichenie sudeiskogo usmotreniia kak sredstvo povysheniia effektivnosti pravosudiia po grazhdanskim delam [Limitation of judicial discretion as a means to improve the effectiveness of justice in civil cases]. In O. V. Isaenkova (Ed.), Materials of the 4th International Scientific-Practical Conference "Prospects of development of civil procedural law" (pp. 219-223). Saratov: Saratov State Law Academy.
Leskova, Iu.G. (2016). Korporativnye akty kak istochniki prava [Corporate acts as sources of law]. Journal of Entrepreneurship and Corporate Law, 4, 15-19.
Maleshin, D.Ia. (2011). Grazhdanskaia protsessualnaia sistema Rossii [Civil procedural system of Russia]. Moscow: Statut.
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (1995). Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation of October 31, 1995 No. 8 (as amended on February 6, 2007) “On certain issues of the application of the Constitution of the Russian Federation in the administration of justice”. Retrieved from https://www.vsrf.ru/documents/own/8342/
Plenum of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. (2013). Resolution of the Plenum of the Supreme Court of July 27, 2013 No. 21 “On the application of the Convention for the protection of human rights and fundamental freedoms of November 4, 1950, and its Protocols by general jurisdiction courts”. Retrieved from https://www.vsrf.ru/documents/own/8352/
Postema, G.J. (1986). Bentham and the common law traditions. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
Samsonov, N.V. (2020). Akty suda EAES i sistema istochnikov (form) rossiiskogo grazhdanskogo protsessualnogo prava [Acts of the EEU court and the system of sources (forms) of the Russian civil procedural law]. Sovremennoe pravo, 1, 98-102. https://doi.org/10.25799/NI.2020.44.87.015
Shershenevich, G.F. (1909). Grazhdanskoe pravo: uchebnik [Civil law: Textbook]. St. Petersburg: Izd. Br. Bashmakovykh, p. 79.
Shitkina, I.S. (1999). Lokalnoe regulirovanie deiatelnosti aktsionernogo obshchestva [Local regulation of the operation of a joint-stock company]. Gosudarstvo i pravo, 10, 100-105.
State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (1995). Federal Law of July 16, 1995 No. 101-FZ "On international treaties of the Russian Federation". Sobranie Zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [SZ RF] [Collection of Legislation of the RF] 17.07.1995, No. 29, Item 2757.
State Duma of the Federal Assembly of the Russian Federation. (1996). Federal Law of December 31, 1996 No. 1-FKZ "On the judicial system of the Russian Federation". Sobranie Zakonodatel’stva Rossiiskoi Federatsii [SZ RF] [Collection of Legislation of the RF] 06.01.1997, No. 1, Item 1.
Statute of the International Court of Justice. (1945). International Law in force. Vol. 1. San Francisco, June 26, 1945. Retrieved from https://www.icj-cij.org/en/statute
Svirin, Iu.A. (2020). Sudebnyi pretsedent, pravovye pozitsii suda i sudeiskoe usmotrenie kak istochnik prava [Judicial precedent, legal positions of the court, and judicial discretion as a source of law]. Uchenye trudy Rossiiskoi akademii advokatury i notariata, 4(59), 26-30.
Svirin, Iu.A. (2022). Razmyshlenie o grazhdanskom protsesse. Monografiia [Reflections on Civil Procedure. Monograph]. Moscow: Prometei.
Svirin, Y.A., Gureev, V.A., Shestov, S.N., Fomenko, E.V., & Gorbunov, M.A. (2021). Justice as a function of a democratic state. Laplage em Revista, 7(Extra-D), 288-297. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/S2446-622020217Extra-D1097p.288-297
Williams v. Baddeley. (1892). 2 QB 324 at 326.
Portalis, J. (1989). Discours, rapports et travaux inedits sur Ie code civil. 1884. In: Naissance du Code civil. Available: https://www.legifrance.gouv.fr/codes/id/LEGITEXT000006070721/
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i35.5728
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
