Ocultar
Mostrar todos
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico Optimization of the model of relations between the state and religion in multi-confessional kazakhstan: development of the regulatory framework
Resumen
Objective: The purpose of the study presented in the article is to identify the characteristic features of the modern model of relations between the state and religion in Kazakhstan and find solutions for further optimization of the relationship between the secular and religious lives of the state. Methods: The main research method is an expert survey. Results: Most experts recognize the influence of religion on certain aspects of social life. Most of the respondents noted that there is complete freedom of conscience and equality of religions before the law in Kazakhstan. However, a significant part of the respondents recognized the existence of an unofficial primacy of one of the religions at the state level. The number of opponents of the introduction of the institution of state religion was 52% of the respondents. Conclusion: As a result of the study, the authors noted a formed public demand for limiting the interference of the power factor in the sphere of freedom of conscience and political and geopolitical influences on religious life and state-religious relations. The development of an optimal model of state-religious relations should be aimed at establishing partnerships between the state and religious organizations and filling legal gaps to democratize them, considering the multi-confessional nature of Kazakhstan. It seems necessary to bring the legal framework of relations in line with the content of international legal documents on issues of religious freedom and individual rights.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referencias
Aimukhambetov, T.T., Seitakhmetova, N.L., Mukhitdenova, A.T., Rysbekova, S.S., Omirbekova, A.O., & Alikbayeva, M.B. (2019). Study of the state religious policy in the Republic of Kazakhstan. European Journal of Science and Theology, 15(2), 123-134.
Chumakov, D.D. (2014). Studying of models of interaction between civil society and state: Theoretical and conceptual aspect. RUDN Journal of Political Science, 3, 142-147.
Das, T., Bhattacharyya, R., Alam, F., & Parvin, A. (2020). In-depth semi-structured interviewing: Researching domestic violence as a public health issue in Bangladesh. SAGE Research Methods Cases: Medicine and Health. doi: 10.4135/9781529719840
Dzhikibaeva, I.Kh. (2017). Religioznaya situatsiya v Respublike Kazakhstan [Religious situation in the Republic of Kazakhstan]. In P.L. Zaitsev, & L.A. Zaks (Eds.), Sotsialnyye i kulturnyye protsessy v rossiyskom prigranichye [Social and cultural processes in the Russian border area] (pp. 280-285). Omsk: Gumanitarnyy universitet.
Koukounaras-Liagkis, M. (2015). Religion and religious diversity within education in a social pedagogical context in times of crisis: Can religious education contribute to community cohesion? The International Journal of Social Pedagogy, 4(1), 85-100.
Kozyrev, T. (2016). Kazakhstan, Spectrum, 2(76), 19-36.
Lehman, D. (2010). Rational choice and the sociology of religion. In B.S. Turner (Ed.), The New Blackwell companion to the sociology of religion (pp. 181-199). Oxford: Wiley Blackwell.
Lewis, J.R. (2005). Overview the Oxford handbook of new religious movements. Oxford; New York: Oxford University Press, pp. 3-15.
Miroshnikova, E. (2007). Kooperatsionnaya model gosudarstvenno-tserkovnykh otnoshenii: Opyt i problemy [The cooperation model of state-church relations: Experience and problems]. Moscow: Institut Evropy RAN, 181 p.
Mladenović, I., & Mircov, V. (2016). Types of relationships between the state, religion and religious organizations in Europe - an attempt to develop a new classification. Annals of the Faculty of Law in Belgrade, 64(3), 241-265.
Nieuwenhuis, A.J. (2012). State and religion, a multidimensional relationship: Some comparative law remarks. International Journal of Constitutional Law, 10(1), 153-174.
Okhotskiy, Ye.V. (2015). The choice of a secular state model as a problem of Russia's civilisational self-determination. Law and Management. XXI Century, 1(34), 72-78.
OSCE. (2007). The Toledo guiding principles on teaching about religions and beliefs in public schools. Warsaw: OSCE. Retrieved from https://www.osce.org/files/f/documents/c/e/29154.pdf
Ozhiganova, A. (2017). Teaching religion in schools: The search for neutrality and the "Culture wars". Introductory article. Gosudarstvo, religiya, tserkov' v Rossii i za rubezhom, 4, 7-29.
Perchoc, P. (2018). Religion and the EU's external policies. Increasing engagement. European Parliamentary Research Service. Retrieved from http://www.europarl.europa.eu/pdf/divers/EPRS-IDA-614612-Religion-EU-external-policies-FINAL.PDF
Petyukova, O.N. (2010). Models of state-confessional relations: Foreign experience of legal regulation. Pravovoi kurer, Vestnik FA, 3(57), 57-61.
Robbers, G. (2009). Gosudarstva i religii v Evropeiskom Soyuze (opyt gosudarstvenno-konfessionalnykh otnoshenii) [State and church in the European Union (the experience of relations between state and confessions)]. Moscow: Institut Evropy RAN, 722 p.
Sgibneva, O.I. (2012). Relations between the state and religious organisations in the context of freedom of conscience. Vestnik VGU, Series 7, 1(16), 99-104.
Shalyapin, S.O. (2014). Comparative legal classification of contemporary models of state-confessional relations. Vestnik RUDN, Seriya Yuridicheskie nauki, 2, 153-170.
Volodina, N. (2013). Specifics of the relationship between the state and religious associations in European countries to overcome conflicts on a confessional basis. Pravovaya initsiativa, 3. Retrieved from http://49e.ru/ru/2013/3/1
Yavuz, H.M., & Öztürk, A.E. (2019). Turkish secularism and Islam under the reign of Erdoğan. Journal of Southeast European and Black Sea Studies, 19(1), 1-9.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i32.5647
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
