NETOCRACY AS A SUBJECT OF THE MODERN INFORMATION SOCIETY
Abstract
Objective: This article examines the study of issues related to the formation of the information society, with a primary focus on the emerging new ruling class – the netocracy. It reveals some features and characteristics of this developing global upper class. The article discusses approaches to analyzing the information society, its network structure, and the place of netocracy within the post-industrial society, which possesses knowledge and technologies for managing people's behavior and their organizations. Results and Discussion: The netocracy is set to gain dominance in the future information society due to its mastery of information and ability to handle it. Owing to its central position in information networks, the monopoly on knowledge of network organizations, and the ability to use this knowledge to manage people, the netocracy becomes a class dominating the information society. Conclusion: An overabundance of information leads to the netocracy, which can manage information and use it to generate exclusive knowledge, becoming the meritocracy of a post-industrial society. The exclusive position of the netocracy within the meta-information space, as well as its ability and competence to systematically shape the meta-information sphere, makes it a driving force in the development of a post-industrial information society. However, despite the crisis-stricken state of modern capitalist society and the bourgeoisie's inability to find a solution to the system-wide crisis, the netocracy has not yet acquired the necessary resource base to emerge as a dominant and ruling force.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
All-Russian Public Opinion Research Center and "Platform" Social Projection Center. (2020, September 24). From bloggers to influencers: The struggle for attention and influence on the audience. New trends. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://wciom.ru/analytical-reports/analiticheskii-doklad/ot-blogerov-k-inflyuenseram-borba-za-vnimanie-i-vliyanie-na-auditoriyu-novye-trendy
Bard, A., & Soderqvist, J. (2002). Netocracy: The new power elite and life after capitalism. 1st ed. London; New York: Pearson Education, 288 p.
Burrel, M. (2003). Lobbying and the media: Working with politicians and journalists. Thorogood.
Castells, M. (2011). Communication power. 2nd ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 571 p.
Fatykhova, D.R., Ostroumov, A.I., & Ostroumova, O.F. (2019). Modernization of the political system of Russia: Targets and priority directions. Revista Genero & Direito, 8(6), 152-162. https://doi.org/10.22478/ufpb.2179-7137.2019v8n6.49294
García-Orosa, B. (2021). Disinformation, social media, bots, and astroturfing: the fourth wave of digital democracy. Profesional de la Informacion, 30(6), e300603. https://doi.org/10.3145/epi.2021.nov.03
Generalova, A. (2020, May 29). Lev Manovich o Data-science: “Problema XXI veka - pereizbytok informatsii. Mirom budet pravit' tot, kto nauchitsya pol'zovat'sya statistikoy” [Lev Manovich on Data Science: "The problem of the 21st century is information overload. The one who will rule the world is the one who learns to use statistics"]. Sobaka magazine. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://www.sobaka.ru/city/science/109510
Lyasko, A. (2017, January 19). How social networks influence you: 7 scientifically proven facts. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://daily.afisha.ru/relationship/4270-kak-na-vas-vliyayut-socseti-7-nauchno-dokazannyh-faktov/
Mathaisel, D.F.X., & Comm, C.L. (2021). Political marketing with data analytics. Journal of Marketing Analytics, 9(1), 56-64. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41270-020-00097-1
Minot, J.R., Arnold, M.V., Alshaabi, T., Danforth, C.M., & Dodds, P.S. (2021). Ratioing the President: An exploration of public engagement with Obama and Trump on Twitter. PLoS ONE, 16(4), e0248880. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0248880
Sevin, E. (2021). New data sources and presidential campaigns. American Behavioral Scientist. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/00027642211021634
Volodenkov, S.V. (2018). The role of information and communication technologies in modern politics. Scientific Yearbook of the Institute of Philosophy and Law of the Ural Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 18(2), 69-86. https://doi.org/10.17506/ryipl.2016.18.2.6986
Wallerstein, I. (1999). The end of the world as we know it: Social science for the twenty-first century. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press, 277 p.
Zuykova, A. (2020, June 25). Big data and big politics: How technology affects elections. RBC Trends. Retrieved November 20, 2021 from https://trends.rbc.ru/trends/industry/5://trends.rbc.ru/trends/industry/5ef4c3299a7947db 501485f8
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v6i40.6355
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Brazilian Journal of Law and International Relations e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brazil). CEP 80.220-181