PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM AND FAIRNESS EVIDENCE FROM MANUFACTURING COMPANIES IN INDONESIA

DEBBIANITA DEBBIANITA, SETIN SETIN, YUNITA CHRISTY, RINI HANDAYANI

Resumo


The purpose of this study is to examine how important are the non-financial and relative performance measures when being used to evaluate managers' performance, and to examine the effect of performance measures (non-financial and relative) on the sense of fairness. There were a total of 159 questionnaires that can be analyzed. Multiple linear regression with SPSS software was used for data analysis. The findings showed that non-financial performance measures are more important to be considered by superiors than relative performance measures when evaluating managers' performance; performance measurement system in accordance with the principle of fairness; the use of non-financial performance measures is proven to increase the perception of fairness and the use of relative performance measures is not proven to reduce the sense of fairness. Relative performance measures are a solution to the difficulty of determining the level of performance targets caused by uncertainty.

Palavras-chave


non-financial measure, relative performance measure, fairness

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Agritansia, P.P., and Sholihin, M. (2011). The Attitudinal and Behavioral Effects of Nonfinancial Measures. Gadjah Mada International Journal of Business, 13 (3): 267-286.

Banker, R. D., H. Chang, and M. J. Pizzini. (2004). The Balanced Scorecard: Judgmental Effects of Performance Measures Linked to Strategy. The Accounting Review, 79 (1): 1-23.

Baerdemaeker, J. D. UGent. and Bruggeman, W. UGent. (2015). The Impact of Participation in Strategic Planning on Managers' Creation of Budgetary Slack: The Mediating Role of Autonomous Motivation and Affective Organisational Commitment. Management Accounting Research, 29: 1-12.

Butterfield, R., C. Edwards, and J. Woodall. 2005. The new public management and managerial roles: The case of the police sergeant. British Journal of Management 16 (4): 329-341.

Chen, D., Liang, S. and Zhu, P. (2012). Relative Performance Evaluation and Executive Compensation: Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies. China Journal of Accounting Research, 5 (2): 127-144.

Chia, D.P.S; Lau, C.M., and Tan, S.L.C. (2014). The Relationships between Performance Measures and Employee Outcomes: The Mediating Roles of Procedural Fairness and Trust, in Davila, A., Epstein, M. J., and Manzoni, J.F. (ed.) Performance Measurement and Management Control: Behavioral Implications and Human Actions (Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, Vol 28, Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 203 – 232.

Collins, F., Munter, P., and Don W. Finn. (1987). The Budgeting Games People Play. The Accounting Review, 62 (1): 29-49.

Colquitt, J.A., Conlon, D.E., Wesson, M.J., Porter, C.O.L.H. and Ng, K.Y. (2001). Justice at the Millennium: A Meta Analytic Review of 25 Years of Organizational Research. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 425–445.

Dekker, H.C., Groot, T.L.C.M. and Schoute, M. (2012), Determining Performance Targets. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 24 (2): 21-46.

Garvey, G. and Milbourn, T. (2006). Asymmetric Benchmarking in Compensation: Executives are Rewarded for Good Luck but Not Penalized for Bad. Journal of Financial Economics, 82 (1): 197-225.

Ghalayini, A. M., J. S. Noble, and T. J. Crowe. (1997). An Integrated Dynamic Performance Measurement System for Improving Manufacturing Competitiveness. International Journal of Production Economics, 48: 207-225.

Gibbons, R and Murphy K. J. (1990). Relative Performance Evaluation for Chief Executive Officers. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 43.

Greenberg, J. (1987). A Taxonomy of Organizational Justice Theories. The Academy of Management Review, 12 (1): 9-22.

Hair, J., M. Sarstedt, C. Ringle., and J. Mena. (2012). An Assessment of the Use of Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling in Marketing Research. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 40:414-433.

He, J.Q and Lau, C.M. (2012). Does the Reliance on Nonfinancial Measures for Performance Evaluation Enhance Managers’ Perceptions of Procedural Fairness? In Performance Measurement and Management Control: Global Issues. Studies in Managerial and Financial Accounting, 25, 363–388.

Hopwood, A. (l972). An Empirical Study of the Role of Accounting Data in Performance Evaluation. Journal of Accounting Research 47 (Supplement): 156-182.

Hoque, Z., L. Mia, and M. Alam. 2001. Market competition, computer-aided manufacturing and use of multiple performance measures: An empirical study. British Accounting Review 33 (1): 23-45.

Huang, C. L. and M. L. Chen. 2010. Playing devious games, budget‐emphasis in performance evaluation, and attitudes towards the budgetary process. Management Decision 48 (6): 940-951.

Ittner, C.D., and D.F. Larcker. (1998). Are NonFinancial Measures Leading Indicators of Financial Performance? An Analysis of Customer Satisfaction. Journal of Accounting Research, 36: l-35.

Jelley, R.B. and Goffin, R.D. (2001). Can Performance-Feedback Accuracy Be Improved? Effects of Rater Priming and Rating Scale Format on Rating Accuracy. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86: 134–144.

Kaplan., R., and A. Atkinson (1998). Advanced Management Accounting. Englewood cliffs NJ: Prentice Hall.

Kaplan, R. S., and D. P. Norton. (1992). The Balanced Scorecard: Measures that Drive Performance. Harvard Business Review (January–February): 71-79.

Kaplan, R., Norton, D. (2001). The Strategy-Focused Organization: How Balanced Scorecard Companies Thrive in the New Business Environment. Harvard Business School Press, Boston, Massachusetts.

Latham, G.P. and Seijts, G.H. (1997). The Effect of Appraisal Instrument on Managerial Perceptions of Fairness and Satisfaction with Appraisals from their Peers. Canadian Journal of Behavioral Science, 29: 275–282.

Lau, C. M. (2015). The Effects of Nonfinancial Performance Measures on Role Clarity, Procedural Fairness and Managerial Performance, Pacific Accounting Review, 27 (2): 142 – 165.

Lau, C. M., and A. Moser. (2008). Behavioural Effects of Nonfinancial Performance Measures: The Role of Procedural Fairness. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 20 (2): 55-71.

Lau, C.M., and Scully. (2015). The Roles of Organizational Politics and Fairness in the Relationship Between Performance Measurement Systems and Trust. Behavioral Research in Accounting, 27 (1): 25-53.

Lau, C. M. and Sholihin, M. (2005). Financial and Nonfinancial Measures: How Do They Affect Job Satisfaction? The British Accounting Review, 37: 389- 413.

Leventhal, G. S. (1980). What Should Be Done with Equity Theory? New Approaches to the Study of Faimess in Social Relationships. In Social Exchanges: Advances in Theory and Research, edited by K. Gergen, M. Greenberg, and R. Willis, 257255. New york, Ny: Plenum Press.

Liu, L.S. and Leitch, R.A. (2013). Performance Effects of Setting Targets and Pay–Performance Relations Before or After Operations. Management Accounting Research, 24 (2): 64-79.

Morlidge, S. and Player, S. (2010). Future Ready: How to Master Business Forecasting, John Wiley & Sons, Chichester.

Murphy, K.R. and Cleveland, J.N. (1995). Understanding Performance Appraisal: Social, Organizational, and Goal-Based Perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

O’Grady, W. and Akroyd, C. (2016). The MCS Package in A Non-Budgeting Organisation: A Case Study of Mainfreight. Qualitative Research in Accounting & Management, 13 (1): 2-30.

Roch, Sylvia G. and Sternburgh, Angela M. and Caputo, Pat M. (2007). Absolute vs Relative Performance Rating Formats: Implications for Fairness and Organizational Justice. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 15 (3): 302-316.

Soetanto, T. V., and L. P. Fun. 2015. Super slack-based model efficiency and stock performance of manufacturing industry listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 211: 1231-1239.

Schweitzer, M. E., Ordóñez, L., & Douma, B. (2004). Goal Setting as a Motivator of Unethical Behavior. Academy of Management Journal, 47 (3): 422-432.

Sholihin, M. (2009). Antecedents and Consequences of Fairness in Performance Evaluation Process. Dissertation. School of Management. University of Bradford.

Van Elten, H.J. (2017). Relative Performance Evaluation amongst Business Unit Level Managers. Accounting Research Journal, 30 (2): 185-204.

Wiersma, E. (2017). How and When do Firms Translate Slack into Better Performance? The British Accounting Review, 1-15.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i41.5842

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share


Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880

Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181

Licença Creative Commons

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.