Ocultar
Mostrar todos
Envíe este artículo por correo electrónico SUSTAINABLE LABOUR MANAGEMENT IN THE EU: REGULATORY FRAMEWORKS AND POLICY IMPLICATIONS FOR INCLUSIVE INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT
Resumen
Objectives: This article aims to analyse how sustainable labour management can promote inclusive economic growth within the European Union. It examines the regulatory frameworks and institutional mechanisms that shape EU labour governance. The study seeks to understand how labour strategies can reconcile competitiveness, social justice, and environmental responsibility. Additionally, it positions sustainable labour management within broader social policy paradigms such as social investment and flexicurity.
Methodology: The research adopts a qualitative methodological approach based on an extensive literature review and analysis of EU regulatory frameworks. It examines key directives and policy instruments shaping labour governance at the supranational and national levels. A comparative case study method is applied to Germany, Sweden, and Denmark. This approach allows the identification of best practices and structural challenges in sustainable labour management.
Results: The findings demonstrate that sustainable labour management operates as a hybrid governance model integrating economic, social, and environmental dimensions. Germany’s dual vocational training system enhances productivity and reduces youth unemployment. Sweden’s gender equality and work-life balance policies strengthen inclusive participation. Denmark’s flexicurity model combines labour flexibility with strong social protection, although it presents certain trade-offs for vulnerable workers.
Conclusions: The study concludes that sustainable labour management requires coordinated multilevel governance aligned with digital and green transitions. EU labour policy must integrate lifelong learning, social protection, and ecological responsibility to ensure long-term resilience. A hybrid framework combining social investment and flexicurity paradigms provides a viable path forward. Ultimately, inclusive prosperity in the EU depends on cohesive, forward-looking labour strategies.
Palabras clave
Texto completo:
PDF (Português (Brasil))Referencias
ANDO, S., BALAKRISHNAN, R., GRUSS, B., et al. (2022). European labor markets and the COVID-19 pandemic: Fallout and the path ahead (Departmental Paper No. 004). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5089/9798400200960.087
ANTUNES, F., PEREIRA, L. F., DIAS, Á. L., et al. (2023). Flexible labour policies as competitive advantage. Global Journal of Flexible Systems Management, 24, 563–590. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40171-023-00352-1.
BÁRD, P. (2021). In courts we trust, or should we? Judicial independence as the precondition for the effectiveness of EU law. European Law Journal, 27(1–3), 185–210. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/eulj.12425
BENACH, J., VIVES, A., AMABLE, M., et al. (2014). Precarious employment: Understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annual Review of Public Health, 35, 229–253. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-publhealth-032013-182500
BONOLI, G., & PALIER, B. (1998). Changing the politics of social programmes: Innovative change in British and French welfare reforms. Journal of European Social Policy, 8(4). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/095892879800800403
BONDE, J. P. (2008). Psychosocial factors at work and risk of depression: A systematic review of the epidemiological evidence. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 65(7), 438–445. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1136/oem.2007.038430
BUBAK, O. (2018). Flexicurity and the dynamics of the welfare state adjustments. Transfer: European Review of Labour and Research, 24(4), 387–404. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1024258918781732
BHATTACHARYA, S., SACHDEV, B. K., RODRIGUES, J. N., & CABETE, D. C. R. N. (2025). Green technologies and policies for forest conservation in South and Southeast Asia. Actualidad Jurídica Ambiental, 15, sección “Artículos doctrinale”. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.56398/ajacieda.00409.
BÜRGISSER, R. (2023). Policy responses to technological change in the workplace (JRC Working Papers Series on Social Classes in the Digital Age, 2023/04). European Commission. Retrieved from: https://publications.jrc.ec.europa.eu/repository/handle/JRC130830
BUX, U., & MACIEJEWSKI, M. (2025). Competences of the Court of Justice of the European Union. European Parliament. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/12/competences-of-the-court-of-justice-of-the-european-union
CANTILLON, B. (2011). The paradox of the social investment state: Growth, employment and poverty in the Lisbon era. Journal of European Social Policy, 21(5), 432–449. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928711418856
CANTILLON, B., & VAN LANCKER, W. (2013). Three shortcomings of the social investment perspective. Social Policy and Society, 12(4), 553–564. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1474746413000080.
CLEGG, D. (2007). Continental drift: On unemployment policy change in Bismarckian welfare states. Social Policy & Administration, 41(6), 597–617. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9515.2007.00574.x
CHELLAM, N., & DIVYA, D. (2022). The effect of promoting mental health through employee assistance program. Journal of Education Society & Multiculturalism, 3(2). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.2478/jesm-2022-0017.
CYLUS, J., & AL TAYARA, L. (2021). Health, an ageing labour force, and the economy: Does health moderate the relationship between population age-structure and economic growth? Social Science & Medicine, 287, Article 114353. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114353
DUNDAR ARAVACIK, E. (2019). Social policy and the welfare state. In B. Açikgöz (Ed.), Public economics and finance. IntechOpen. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.82372.
DUNDON, T., DOBBINS, T., CULLINANE, N., et al. (2014). Employer occupation of regulatory space of the Employee Information and Consultation (I&C) Directive in liberal market economies. Work, Employment and Society, 28(1), 21–39. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0950017012466688
EDGE, C. E., COOPER, A. M., & COFFEY, M. (2017). Barriers and facilitators to extended working lives in Europe: A gender focus. Public Health Reviews, 38(2). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s40985-017-0053-8
EUROFOUND, & EU-OSHA. (2020). Psychosocial risks in Europe: Prevalence and strategies for prevention. Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/en/publications/2014/psychosocial-risks-europe-prevalence-and-strategies-prevention.
EUROFOUND. (2020). Living, working and COVID-19 (COVID-19 series). Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from: https://www.eurofound.europa.eu/system/files/2020-10/ef20059en.pdf.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2022). New rights to improve work-life balance in the EU enter into application today (Press release). Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/commission/presscorner/detail/en/ip_22_4785
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2023), Labour market and wage developments in Europe 2023. Retrieved from: https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/lmwd-annual-review-report-2023/chapter1/general-labour-market-in-eu.html . Accessed on: 25 January. 2026.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (2023). Labour market and wage developments in Europe 2023. Retrieved from: https://op.europa.eu/webpub/empl/lmwd-annual-review-report-2023/chapter1/general-labour-market-in-eu.html.
EUROPEAN COMMISSION. (n.d.). Employment, Social Affairs & Inclusion: The European Pillar of Social Rights Action Plan. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/social/main.jsp?catId=1607&langId=en
EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT. (2019). Gig economy: How the EU improves platform workers’ rights. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/topics/en/article/20190404STO35070/gig-economy-how-the-eu-improves-platform-workers-rights
EUROSTAT. (2023a). Labour market statistics at regional level. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Labour_market_statistics_at_regional_level.
EUROSTAT. (2023a). Labour market statistics at regional level. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Labour_market_statistics_at_regional_level.
EUROSTAT. (2023b). Labour market slack – Employment supply and demand mismatch. Retrieved from: https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/index.php?title=Labour_market_slack_-_employment_supply_and_demand_mismatch
FALLAH SHAYAN, N., MOHABBATI-KALEJAHI, N., ALAVI, S., et al. (2022). Sustainable development goals (SDGs) as a framework for corporate social responsibility (CSR). Sustainability, 14(3), Article 1222. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su14031222.
FERRERA, M. (2005). The boundaries of welfare: European integration and the new spatial politics of social protection. Oxford University Press.
FORSTER-VAN AERSSEN, K., & SPITAL, T. (2023). The impact of Brexit on UK trade and labour markets. European Central Bank. Retrieved from: https://www.ecb.europa.eu/press/economic-bulletin/articles/2023/html/ecb.ebart202303_01~3af23c5f5a.en.html
FÜRSTENAU, B., PILZ, M., & GONON, P. (2022). The dual system of vocational education and training in Germany – What can be learnt about education for (other) professions. In S. Billett et al. (Eds.), International handbook of research in professional and practice-based learning. Springer. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-8902-8_16
GHOSHEH, N. (2016). Remembering rest periods in law: Another tool to limit excessive working hours (Conditions of Work and Employment Series No. 78). International Labour Office. Retrieved from: https://www.ilo.org/publications/remembering-rest-periods-law-another-tool-limit-excessive-working-hours
HANNA, R., HEPTONSTALL, P., & GROSS, R. (2024). Job creation in a low carbon transition to renewables and energy efficiency: A review of international evidence. Sustainability Science, 19, 125–150. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-023-01440-y
HEIMBERGER, P., & LICHTENBERGER, A. (2024). A permanent EU investment fund to promote the green transition in light of EU fiscal rules. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2024.0134
HEIN, E., & LAVOIE, M. (2025). “Central banks, whether they like it or not, affect the distribution of income”: Interview with Sheila Dow. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 22(1), 1–8. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2025.0145
HEIN, E., & LAVOIE, M. (2024). “Profit margins are determined by the need for companies to generate enough internal finance to pay for their investment”: Interview with Adrian Wood. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 21(3), 363–369. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2024.0128
HEMERIJCK, A. (2013). Changing welfare states. Oxford University Press.
HOWARD, E. (2018). EU anti-discrimination law: Has the CJEU stopped moving forward? International Journal of Discrimination and the Law, 18(2–3), 60–81. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1358229118788454
HUĐEK, I., & ŠIREC, K. (2023). Unveiling the impact of the gig economy on sustainable development. In V. Bevanda (Ed.), ERAZ Conference – Knowledge Based Sustainable Development: Selected papers (Vol. 9, pp. 125–133). Association of Economists and Managers of the Balkans. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.31410/ERAZ.S.P.2023.125
IIBS. (2024). The gig economy's impact on traditional employment. Retrieved from: https://www.iibs.edu.in/news/the-gig-economys-impact-on-traditional-employment-1249
IWASAKI, I., & SATOGAMI, M. (2023). Gender wage gap in European emerging markets: A meta-analytic perspective. Journal of Labour Market Research, 57(9). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12651-023-00333-y
JENSEN, S. (2011). The flexibility of flexicurity: The Danish model reconsidered. Economic & Industrial Democracy, 32(4), 721–737. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0143831X11401928
KAHANEC, M., & PYTLIKOVÁ, M. (2017). The economic impact of east–west migration on the European Union. Empirica, 44, 407–434. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-017-9370-x
KREININ, H., & AIGNER, E. (2022). From “decent work and economic growth” to “sustainable work and economic degrowth”: A new framework for SDG 8. Empirica, 49, 281–311. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10663-021-09526-5
KULLMANN, M. (2024). The “temporariness” of temporary agency work assignments. European Labour Law Journal, 15(1), 4–16. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/20319525241227854
LANE, L., & JORDANSSON, B. (2020). How gender equal is Sweden? An analysis of the shift in focus under neoliberalism. Social Change, 50(1), 28–43. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0049085719901067
MACIEJEWSKI, M. (2025). The principle of subsidiarity. European Parliament. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/7/the-principle-of-subsidiarity
Madsen, P. K. (2006). How can it possibly fly? The paradox of a dynamic labour market in a Scandinavian welfare state. In J. L. Campbell et al. (Eds.), National identity and the varieties of capitalism: The Danish experience (pp. 321–355). McGill-Queen’s University Press.
MATEI, M.-C., ABRUDAN, L.-C., & ABRUDAN, M.-M. (2024). Financial perspectives on human capital: Building sustainable HR strategies. Sustainability, 16, Article 1441. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.3390/su16041441
MOREL, N., Palier, B., & Palme, J. (Eds.). (2012). Towards a social investment welfare state? Ideas, policies and challenges. Policy Press.
Moș, A.-G., MACIEJEWSKI, M., & BUX, U. (2024). Intellectual, industrial and commercial property. European Parliament. Retrieved from: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/factsheets/en/sheet/36/wlasnosc-intelektualna-przemyslowa-ihandlowa
MOSHOOD, T. D., NAWANIR, G., MAHMUD, F., et al. (2021). Green and low carbon matters: A systematic review of the past, today, and future on sustainability supply chain management practices among manufacturing industry. Cleaner Engineering and Technology, 4, Article 100144. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.clet.2021.100144
MULDER, J. (2019). (Re)conceptualising a social market economy for the EU internal market. Utrecht Law Review, 15(2), 16–31. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18352/ulr.508
NIEDHAMMER, I., BERTRAIS, S., & WITT, K. (2021). Psychosocial work exposures and health outcomes: A meta-review of 72 literature reviews with meta-analysis. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 47(7). Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.3968
RENNUY, N. (2020). Posting of workers: Enforcement, compliance, and reform. European Journal of Social Security, 22(2), 212–234. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/1388262720931658
RODRIGUES, J. N., & CABETE, D. (2024). The Council of Europe, the motor of the European Union's legislative development in matter of promotion of human rights. Janus.net, e-journal of international relations, 15(1), 133–154. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.15.1.8
RODRIGUES, J. N., BHATTACHARYA, S., & CABETE, D. C. R. (2022). The new work culture of the gig economy: An analysis of how the gig economy is altering employment prospects and extending talent pools. Janus.net, e-journal of international relations, 13(2), 87–395. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.26619/1647-7251.13.2
RODRIGUES, J. N., BHATTACHARYA, S., & CABETE, D. (2025). Impact of financial terrorism in global economic, counter feeding currency and other digital cyber crimes. Relações Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 1(47), 15–38. Retrieved from: https://revista.unicuritiba.edu.br/index.php/RIMA/index
RODRIGUES, J. N., SILVA, F., MEDEIROS, N., et al. (2024). Employment support policies: The case of the Azores, Portugal. In J. Zajda (Ed.), Fourth international handbook of globalisation, education and policy research (pp. 323–345). Springer. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-67667-3_17
RODRIGUES, J. N., CABETE, D. C. R., & VISSING, Y. (2025). Global injustice: The universal basic income. Veredas do Direito, 22(6), e223631. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v22.n6.3631.
RODRIGUES, J. N., MEDINA, J. C., & CABETE, D. C. R. (2024). Artificial intelligence in the face of the normative silence of international law: A look at the European Union and MERCOSUR. Brazilian Journal of International Law, 21(3), 305–318. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5102/rdi.v21i3.9361
RODRIGUES, J. N., BHATTACHARYA, S., & CABETE, D. (2024). The economics of location and space: Urbanisation in South Asia. Veredas do Direito, 21. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.18623/rvd.v21.2638
STANDING, G. (2011). The precariat: The new dangerous class. Bloomsbury Academic.
STANSFELD, S. A., & CANDY, B. (2006). Psychosocial work environment and mental health: A meta-analytic review. Scandinavian Journal of Work, Environment & Health, 32(6), 443–462. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.5271/sjweh.1050
VAN DEN BRINK, T. (2017). The impact of EU legislation on national legal systems: Towards a new approach to EU–member state relations. Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies, 19, 211–235. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1017/cel.2017.2
WALTERS, D., & WADSWORTH, E. (2022). Work arrangements, welfare and preventing ill-health at work: A comparative analysis of policy in EU countries. European Journal of Social Security, 24(4), 357–373. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/13882627221121640
WATANABE, T. (2025). Bank credit, expected inflation rate, and financial dynamics. European Journal of Economics and Economic Policies: Intervention, 22(1), 9–31. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.4337/ejeep.2024.0130
WOODWARD, A. E. (2008). Too late for gender mainstreaming? Taking stock in Brussels. Journal of European Social Policy, 18(3), 289–302. Retrieved from: https://doi.org/10.1177/0958928708091056
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i52.8349
Enlaces refback
- No hay ningún enlace refback.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
