ADMINISTRATIVE LIABILITY IN UKRAINE: CONTEMPORARY CHALLENGES AND DEVELOPMENT PROSPECTS
Resumo
Objective: To analyze the current state of administrative liability in Ukraine, assess contemporary challenges, and outline development prospects amid European integration, public-administration digitalization, and conditions of martial law.
Methods: The study employs formal-legal methods to examine existing legislation, comparative-legal analysis to evaluate international and European practices, a systemic approach to interpret administrative liability as part of Ukraine’s legal architecture, and logical-analytical methods to identify major trends, shortcomings, and directions for reform. The empirical basis includes Ukrainian legal acts, judicial decisions, international agreements, and scholarly literature.
Results: Findings demonstrate that administrative liability remains a key mechanism for ensuring legality and public order. The research identifies essential developments driven by legal reforms, digital transformation and European integration requirements. Notable trends include the simplification of administrative procedures, the introduction of electronic systems for detecting and processing offenses, decentralization of administrative control, and reduction of regulatory pressure on businesses. At the same time, contemporary challenges—legal uncertainty, fragmented norms, risks of administrative abuse and the effects of martial law—highlight the need for substantial modernization of liability mechanisms.
Conclusion: The study concludes that Ukraine’s system of administrative liability requires comprehensive reform. Key priorities include legislative improvement, enhanced transparency, protection of citizens’ rights and freedoms, effective digitalization of administrative processes, and alignment with European standards. A holistic approach is necessary to ensure fair, efficient, and rights-respecting administrative enforcement in line with the principles of the rule of law.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
Averyanov, V. B. (Ed.) (2004). Administrative law of Ukraine. Academic course (Vol. 1). Kyiv: Yurydychna Dumka.
Borodin, L. I., & Kruglov, V. A. (2012). On the issue of the definition of "Administrative Liability". Legal Bulletin, 1(22), 39–44.
Gavrushchenko, I. V. (2012). Administrative responsibility: approaches to understanding. Customs Business, 1(79), Part 2, Book 2, 334-338.
Grishina, N. V. (2006). To understanding the social essence of administrative responsibility. Bulletin of Kharkiv National University of Internal Affairs, (32), 130-134. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/VKhnuvs_2006_32_23
Grishina, N. V. (2008). Socio-legal aspect of administrative responsibility (PhD thesis). Kharkiv.
Koval, L. V. (1996). Administrative law: a course of lectures. Kyiv: Venturi.
Kolpakov, V. K. (2004). Administrative and tort legal phenomenon: a monograph. Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Lukianets, D. M. (2006). Administrative-Delict Relations in Ukraine: Theory and Practice of Legal Regulation: Monograph. Sumy: VTD "Universytetska Knyha".
Oliinyk, A. Yu. (2006). Fundamentals of administrative law of Ukraine. In V. V. Kopieichikov (Ed.), Jurisprudence: Textbook (5th ed., revised and supplemented, pp. 573–606). Kyiv: Yurinkom Inter.
Opryshko, V. F., Shulzhenko, F. P., Shymon, S. I., et al. (2003). [Title of the book] (Ed. by V. F. Opryshko & F. P. Shulzhenko). Kyiv: KNEU. Retrieved from http://buklib.net/books/23339/
Panagiotou , N. (2025). AI Literacy and the Future of Education: A Framework for Ethical and Inclusive Learning Models. Journal of Interdisciplinary Knowledge, 8(knowledge), e01635. https://doi.org/10.37497/jik.v8iknowledge.1635
Shchukin, O. M. (2014). On the issue of conceptualizing the notion of administrative liability. Legal Bulletin, 3(32), 73–78.
Rodrigues, L. C., Dagobi da Silva, R., Espinosa, S. M., & Riscarolli, V. (2024). Artificial intelligence, ethics and speed processing in the law system. PromptAI Academy Journal, 3(00), e082. https://doi.org/10.37497/PromptAI.3.2024.82
Tarakhonych, T. I. (2009). Types of legal responsibility: theoretical and methodological approaches. In N. M. Onishchenko (Ed.), Institute of legal responsibility in democratic legal systems: a monograph (pp. 51-69). Kyiv: Yurydychna Dumka.
Yashchuk, O. (2009). The concept of administrative liability and its features. Law of Ukraine, 12, 242–246.
Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. (1984). Code of Ukraine on Administrative Offenses of 07.12.1984 (Vidomosti Verkhovnoi Rady of the Ukrainian SSR (VVR), 1984, Supplement to No. 51, Art. 1122). Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text (accessed: 01.05.2024).
Zaiats, R. Ya. (2012). The concept and features of administrative liability. Retrieved from http://nbuv.gov.ua/UJRN/Nzlubp_2012_8_6
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i49.7692
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181


