Ocultar
Exibir todos
Enviar artigo via e-mail 
INTERNATIONAL LAW PRINCIPLES IN THE CONTEXT OF ADVANCING GENETIC TECHNOLOGIES
Resumo
Objective: The objective of this study is to analyze the current legal status and regulatory framework of genetic technologies, and to explore pathways for the development and formation of a comprehensive regulatory environment for genetic technologies, focusing on human cloning, genetic research, assisted reproductive technologies, and the handling of biological samples for diagnostic purposes. Methods: The research employs the dialectical method of scientific inquiry, formal logic, historical analysis, and system-structural methods. It examines relevant international treaties, interdisciplinary scientific literature, selected aspects of foreign legislation, and a landmark judicial decision of the Supreme Court of Brazil on the legal use of embryonic stem cells for therapeutic purposes. Results: The study highlights the evolving significance of general and specific principles in international law, such as the principle of sovereign equality of states and the principle of equal rights and self-determination of peoples. These principles are being redefined by concepts like biosovereignty and genomic sovereignty, and by the challenges posed by genetic editing technologies like CRISPR. The analysis underscores the need for national and international principles and standards in the field to align, potentially encompassing erga omnes obligations. Conclusions: The analysis confirms the necessity for national and international principles and standards that govern this field to align, potentially encompassing erga omnes obligations. This alignment is essential to strike a balance between the potential benefits and risks associated with the global-scale deployment of genetic (genomic) technologies.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
Acero L. Science, public policy and engagement: Debates on stem cell research in Brazil // Genomics, Society and Policy. 2010/11. Vol. 6. No. 3.
Biotechnological human improvement as a problem of socio-humanitarian knowledge: mat. School of young scientists / edited by B. G. Yudin, O. V. Popova. М., 2017.
Bogatyreva N. V., Sokolov A. Yu. M. et al. Legal status of plants obtained using genome editing technology: prospects for Russia // Ecological Genetics. 2021. Vol. 19. № 1.
Buinyakova I. S. Human enhancement biotechnology in the paradigm of transhumanist discourse // Scientific Vedomosti Belgorod State University. Series: Philosophy, sociology, law. 2019. Vol. 44. № 2.
Chernichenko S. В. Interrelation of peremptory norms of international law (jus cogens) and obligations erga omnes // Moscow Journal of International Law. 2012. № 3. DOI. 10.24833/0869-0049-2012-3-3-17.
Chetverikov A. O. Science as a legal category: a comparative legal study // Vestnik of O. E. Kutafin University (MGJA). 2019. № 4.
Chubukova S. G. Legal problems of protection of genetic information: subject approach // Bulletin of the O. E. Kutafin University. 2020. № 5.
Danelyan A. A., Gulyaeva E. Е. Legal regulation of genomic information protection in the European Union (Part I) // International Legal Courier. URL: http://inter-legal.ru/pravovoe-regulirovanie-ohrany-genomnoj-informatsii-v-evropejskom-soyuze-chast-i.
Furrow B., Greaney T., Johnson S. et al. Bioethics: Health Care Law and Ethics (American Casebook Series). West Academic Publishing, 2013.
Grebenshchikova E. G. Human improvement projects and the thesis of technological inevitability// Man. 2016. № 5.
Gulyaeva E. E., Anisimov I. O. The common heritage of mankind and the world heritage: correlation of concepts // Suprema - Revista de Estudos Constitucionais. 2022. Vol. 2. No. 2. DOI: 10.53798/suprema.2022.v2.n2.a185.
Gulyaeva E. E. Peculiarities of Approaches to Legal Regulation of Biological Safety in the USA and China. 5 September 2023. (In Russ.) URL: https://www.dipacademy.ru/blog-ekspertov-diplomaticheskoj-akademii/avtory-bloga/gulyaeva-ee/osobennosti-podhodov-k-pravovomu-regulirovaniyu-obespecheniya-biologicheskoj-bezopasnosti-v-ssha-i-knr/
Interests in the mechanism of public power: problems of theory and practice / ed. by Y. A. Tikhomirov. М., 2023.
Jewell K., Shankar Balakrishnan V. The battle for rights to CRISPR/Cas9 genome editing technology // WIPO Journal. 2017. April. URL: https://www.wipo.int/wipo_magazine/ru/2017/02/article_0005.html.
Kalinichenko P. A., Nekoteneva M. V. Genomic sovereignty of developing countries: priorities of legal regulation // Genetic technologies and law in the period of bioeconomy formation / ed. by A. A. Mokhov, O. Sushkova. V. M., 2020.
Khabrieva T. Y. (ed.). Commentary on the Constitution of the Russian Federation (article by article): with account of the amendments approved by the all-Russian vote on July 1, 2020. Moscow, 2021. 368 p. (In Russ.)
Khabrieva T. Y. Projections of the development of convergent technologies in law // Transformation of the paradigm of law in the civilisational development of mankind: reports of the members of the Russian Academy of Sciences / edited by A. N. Savenkov. М., 2019.
Khabrieva T. Y., Chernogor N. N. The future of law. The Legacy of Academician V. S. Stepin and Legal Science. Moscow, 2020. 176 p. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/1112960.
Kholikov I. V., Milovanovich A., Naumov P. Yu. Dynamics of Functioning of International Law in the Conditions of Transformation of Modern World Order: Post Non-Classic Approach // Journal of Russian Law, 2022, vol. 26, no. 11, pp. 132—148. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/ jrl.2022.122.
Krysenkova N.B., Chursina T.I. Legal Regulation of Genetic Researches in Foreign Countries // Journal of Foreign Legislation and Comparative Law, 2019, no. 5, pp. 140—153. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jflcl.2019.5.9.
Leefmann J., Schaper M., Schicktanz S. The Concept of “Genetic Responsibility” and Its Meanings: A Systematic Review of Qualitative Medical Sociology Literature // Frontiers in Sociology. 2017. Vol. 1. Art. 18. DOI: 10.3389/fsoc.2016.00018.
Lipkin M., Rowley P.T. (eds). Genetic Responsibility: On Choosing Our Children’s Genes. New York, 1974.
Luna N. From abortion to embryonic stem cell research: Biossociality and the constitution of subjects in the debate over human right // Vibrant — Virtual Brazilian Anthropology. 2015. Vol. 12. No. 1. DOI: 10.1590/1809-43412015v12n1p167.
Luna N. The right to life in context of abortion and stem cell research: disputes of religious agents and values in a Secular State (Brazil) // Religiao & Sociedade. 2013. Vol. 33. Iss. 1. DOI: 10.1590/S0100-85872013000100005.
Lyutov N. L. Prohibition of Genetic Discrimination and Protection of Genetic Personal Data: Prospects for Modification of Labor Law Norms // Journal of Russian Law, 2021, vol. 25, no. 10, pp. 72—84. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/jrl.2021.124.
Maleina M. N. The concept and classifications of genomic (genetic) information // Lex russica. 2020. Vol. 73. № 7. DOI: 10.17803/1729-5920.2020.164.7.050-058.
Miziara N. M. Audiéncia pública e advocacia em saúde: o caso da ADI № 3.510-0. Public audience and health advocacy: the case of ADI № 3.510-0. URL: www.stf.jus.br/portal/glossario/verVerbete.asp?letra=A&id=481.
Morozov A. N. Constitutional Reflection of Universally Recognised Principles and Norms of International Law // Journal of Russian Law. 2018. № 7. pp. 33-45. (In Russ.) DOI: 10.12737/art_2018_7_3.
Pestrikova A. A. Human gene editing: formation of international principles of legal regulation // Actual problems of Russian law. 2020. Vol. 15. № 2. DOI: 10.17803/1994-1471.2020.111.2.159-165.
Putilo N. V. Legislation of the Russian Federation on Health Care: on the Threshold of Change // Journal of Russian Law. 2010. № 10. pp. 36–45. (In Russ.)
Rae G. Critiquing Sovereign Violence: Law, Biopolitics, Bio-juridicalism. Edinburgh, 2019.
Richardson L. C., Connell N. D., Lewis S. M. et al. Cyberbiosecurity: A Call for Cooperation in a New Threat Landscape. URL: https://www.frontiersin.org/articles/10.3389/fbioe.2019.00099/full.
Romashev Yu. S. General principles of law in the system of international law // Law. Journal of the Higher School of Economics. 2021. № 3.
Smirnov A. В. All-human vs. all-human. 2nd ed. M., 2022.
Tarasyants E. V. International protection and promotion of human rights in the field of biomedical research. М., 2011.
Travieso J.A., Ferraro A.V., Trikoz E.N., Gulyaeva E.E. Bioethical Aspects of Human Rights in Modern Latin America // Kutafin Law Review, 2021. Vol. 8. No. 1. DOI: 10.17803/2313-5395.2021.1.15.085-098.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i45.7101
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
