Ocultar
Exibir todos
Enviar artigo via e-mail LA ESCUELA INGLESA COMO AGENTE REVITALIZADOR DE LAS RELACIONES INTERNACIONALES
Resumo
RESUMEN: El presente artículo aborda la problemática de la falta de desarrollo teórico en la disciplina de las Relaciones Internacionales (RRII). Propone a la Escuela Inglesa (EI), enfrentando críticas de eurocentrismo y carencia teórica, como un puente interdisciplinario capaz de revitalizar la disciplina. La EI, al integrar historia, sociología y teoría política, presenta una base sólida para generar constructos teóricos valiosos que explican y predicen dinámicas globales. Asimismo, se exponen sus contribuciones teóricas, previamente inexploradas, demostrando su potencial para superar el letargo teórico de las RRII.
Palabras clave: Relaciones Internacionales; Teorías de las Relaciones Internacionales; Escuela Inglesa; Historia; Aportes teóricos de la Escuela Inglesa.
ABSTRACT: This article addresses the insufficient theoretical development in International Relations (IR). It proposes that the English School (ES), which faces criticisms of Eurocentrism and theoretical deficiency, should be considered an interdisciplinary bridge capable of invigorating the discipline. By integrating history, sociology, and political theory, the ES provides a solid foundation for generating valuable theoretical constructs that explain and predict global dynamics. Furthermore, it highlights the ES's previously unexplored theoretical contributions, demonstrating its potential to overcome the theoretical stagnation in IR.
Keywords: International Relations; International Relations Theories; English School; History; Theoretical Contributions of the English School.
RESUMO: Este artigo aborda a problemática da falta de desenvolvimento teórico na disciplina de Relações Internacionais (RI). Propõe a Escola Inglesa (EI), enfrentando críticas de eurocentrismo e carência teórica, como uma ponte interdisciplinar capaz de revitalizar a disciplina. Ao integrar história, sociologia e teoria política, a EI presenta uma base sólida para gerar constructos teóricos valiosos que explicam e preveem dinâmicas globais. Além disso, expõe suas contribuições teóricas, anteriormente inexploradas, demonstrando seu potencial para superar a estagnação teórica das RI.
Palavras-chave: Relações Internacionais; Teorias das Relações Internacionais; Escola Inglesa; História; Contribuições teóricas da Escola Inglesa.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDFReferências
Álvarez, G., Deciancio, M., & Ovando, C. (Eds.). (2021). La disciplina de las relaciones internacionales en América Latina. Contribuciones, límites y particularidades. RIL Editores.
Bellamy, A. (2007). The English School. En M. Griffiths (Ed.), International Relations Theory for the twenty-first century: An introduction (pp. 75–87). Taylor & Francis.
Bernal-Meza, R. (2005). América Latina en el mundo: El pensamiento latinoamericano y la teoría de relaciones internacionales. Nuevohacer, Grupo Editor Latinoamericano.
Bernal-Meza, R. (2012). Pensamiento chileno en la política exterior y en las teorías de Relaciones Internacionales. En M. Artaza & C. Ross (Eds.), La política exterior de Chile, 1990-2009: Del aislamiento a la integración global (Primera edición, pp. 21-48). RIL Editores.
Bull, H. (1966). International Theory: The case for a Classical approach. World Politics, 18(3), 361–377. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009761
Bull, H. (1976). Martin Wight and the theory of international relations: The Second Martin Wight Memorial Lecture. British Journal of International Studies, 2, 101-116.
Bull, H. (1977a). Martin Wight and the Study of International Relations. En M. Wight Systems of States (pp. 1-20). Leicester University Press.
Bull, H. (1977b). The Anarchical Society: A Study of Order in World Politics. Columbia University Press.
Buzan, B. (1993). From international system to international society: structural realism and regime theory meet the English school. International Organization, 47(3), 327-352.
Buzan, B. (2004). From international to world society?: English School Theory and the social Structure of Globalisation. Cambridge University Press.
Buzan, B., y Little, R. (2000). International Systems in World History: Remaking the Study of International Relations. Oxford University Press.
Copeland, D. C. (2003). A Realist critique of the English School. Review of International Studies, 29(3), 427–441. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210503004273
Cox, R. W. (1981). Social forces, states and world orders: Beyond international relations theory. Millennium: Journal of International Studies, 10(2), 126-155. https://doi.org/10.1177/03058298810100020501
Del Arenal, C. (2014). Etnocentrismo y teoría de las relaciones internacionales: Una visión crítica. Ed. Tecnos.
Dougherty, J. E., & Pfaltzgraff, R. L. (1971). Contending theories of international relations. Lippincott.
Dunne, T. (1993). Mythology or methodology? Traditions in international theory. Review of International Studies, 19(3), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500117450
Dunne, T. (1998). Inventing International Society: A History of the English School. Palgrave Macmillan.
Dunne, T., Hansen, L., & Wight, C. (2013). The end of International Relations theory? European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 405-425. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113495485
Grader, S. (1988). The English School of International Relations: evidence and evaluation. Review of International Studies, 14(1), 29–44. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500113439
Griffiths, M. (1999). Fifty key thinkers in International Relations. Routledge.
Hall, I. (2002). History, Christianity and diplomacy: Sir Herbert Butterfield and international relations. Review of International Studies, 28(4), 719–736. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210502007192
Hall, I. (2006). The International Thought of Martin Wight. Palgrave Macmillan.
Hamilton, D. S., y Renouard, J. (2024). The transatlantic community and China in the age of disruption: Partners, Competitors, Rivals. Routledge.
Ikenberry, G. J. (2001). After victory: Institutions, strategic restraint, and the rebuilding of order after major wars. Princeton University Press.
Jackson, R. (1996). Is there a classical international theory? En S. Smith, K. Booth, y M. Zalewski (Eds.), International Theory: Positivism and Beyond (pp. 203–218). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511660054.011
Jackson, R. (2002). Martin Wight's Thought on Diplomacy. Diplomacy & Statecraft, 13(4), 1-28. https://doi.org/10.1080/714000351
Jones, R. E. (1981). The English School of International Relations: A Case for Closure. Review of International Studies, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0260210500115086
Kaplan, M. A. (1966). The New Great Debate: Traditionalism vs. Science in International Relations. World Politics, 19(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.2307/2009840
Keohane, R. (1992). International Theory: The Three Traditions. By Martin Wight. American Political Science Review, 86(4), 1112–1113. https://doi.org/10.2307/1964428
Keohane, R., y Nye, J. S. (1987). Power and interdependence revisited. International Organization, 41(4), 725–753. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300027661
Knutsen, T. L. (1992). A History of International Relations Theory: An introduction. Manchester University Press.
Kratochwil, F. (1989). Rules, Norms, and Decisions: On the Conditions of Practical and Legal Reasoning in International Relations and Domestic Affairs. Cambridge University Press.
Linklater, A., y Suganami, H. (2006). The English School of International Relations: A Contemporary Reassessment. Cambridge University Press.
Little, R. (2000). The English School's Contribution to the Study of International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 6(3), 395-422. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066100006003004
Mearsheimer, J. J., y Walt, S. M. (2013). Leaving theory behind: Why simplistic hypothesis testing is bad for International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 427-457. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494320
Moravcsik, A. (1997). Taking preferences seriously: A liberal theory of international politics. International Organization, 51(4), 513-553. https://doi.org/10.1162/002081897550447
Morgenthau, H. (1995). The intellectual and political functions of theory (1970). En J. Der Derian (Ed.), International Theory (pp. 36-52). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Navari, C. (2009). Methods and Methodology in the English School. En C. Navari (Ed.), Theorising International Society: English School Methods (pp. 1-20). Palgrave Macmillan.
Porter, B. (1972). The Aberystwyth Papers: International Politics, 1919-1969. Oxford University Press.
Ruggie, J. G. (1998). Constructing the World Polity: Essays on International Institutionalization. Routledge.
Spegele, R., D. (2005). Traditional Political Realism and the Writing of History. En A. J. Bellamy (Ed.), International society and its Critics (pp. 97–114). Oxford University Press.
Tickner, A. B. (2013). Core, periphery and (Neo)imperialist International Relations. European Journal of International Relations, 19(3), 627-646. https://doi.org/10.1177/1354066113494323
Walt, S. (1998). International Relations: one world, many theories. Foreign Policy, 110, 29–46. https://doi.org/10.2307/1149275
Waltz, K. (1979). Theory of international politics. Addison-Wesley.
Wendt, A. (1999). Social Theory of International Politics. Cambridge University Press.
Wight, M. (1966). Why Is There No International Theory? En H. Butterfield y M. Wight (Eds.), Diplomatic investigations: Essays in the theory of international politics (pp. 37-54). Allen and Unwin.
Wight, M. (1977). Systems of States. Leicester University Press.
Wight, M. (1992). International theory: The Three Traditions (G. Wight y B. Porter, Eds.). Holmes & Meier Publishers.
Wight, M. (1994). International theory: The Three Traditions. Leicester University Press.
Wight, M. (2022). International Relations and political Philosophy. Oxford University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v2i44.7232
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
