CASE LAW REGARDING THE LEGALITY OF SOCIAL MEDIA CYBER-BLACKMAIL
Resumo
Social media evidence (SM) is a relatively new and rapidly growing area of digital forensics. Criminal investigations may greatly benefit from the digital information trail left on social media if it is correctly analysed, especially in situations involving cyber-blackmail. It can be difficult to gather evidence from social media and show it in court, though. It is important to respect both the law and the individual's privacy while gathering social media evidence for cyber blackmail offences. Forensic investigators can conduct fruitful investigations and quickly gather legally reliable evidence if they are given sophisticated tools for controlling the quantity and variety of social media content. The present state of evidence gathering, admissibility, and jurisdiction on social media is studied in order to penalise individuals who engage in cyber-blackmail. In addition to examining Iraqi laws and regulations, the research also considers the difficulties courts today have while gathering, evaluating, presenting, and confirming social media evidence. Moreover, a review of the key elements of a lawsuit, including the case's purpose, the seriousness of the threats made, and the supporting documentation. A descriptive and analytical technique was used to analyse the issue, explain it in all of its aspects, and provide a diagnosis. As a result, we discovered that, in order to prevent cyber-blackmail, the court investigator may run into difficulties because of a legal loophole and a lack of resources for gathering digital evidence in the social media sector. Important aspects of cyber blackmail, such as its scope and character, were also made clear by this study.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
Khaled Mamdouh Ibrahim Muhammad, Information and electronic crimes, a study of information crime in the Knowledge Library, (City: Egypt, 2021), 7.
Kancauskiene, J. (2019). Computer Forensics and Electronic Evidence in Criminal Legal Proceedings: Lithuania's Experience. Digital Evidence & Elec. Signature L. Rev., 16, 11.
Yeboah-Ofori, A., & Brown, A. D. (2020). Digital forensics investigation jurisprudence: issues of admissibility of digital evidence. Journal of Forensic, Legal & Investigative Sciences, 6(1), 1-8.
Cyber Extortion and Threats: Analysis of the United States Case Law
Robert, E. (2021). Attempting a definition of cyber crime. Available at SSRN 3830589.
Hawdon, J. (2021). Cybercrime: Victimization, perpetration, and techniques. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 46(6), 837-842.
Eichensehr, K. (2021). Cyberattack Attribution as Empowerment and Constraint. Hoover Working Group on National Security, Technology, and Law, Aegis Series Paper, (2101).
CRIMINAL PROCEDURE CODE 23 OF 1971
Warnock, D. (2010). The Iraqi criminal justice system, an Introduction. Denv. J. Int'l L. & Pol'y, 39, 1.
Drumbl, M. A. (2006). The Iraqi High Tribunal and Rule of Law: Challenges. In Proceedings of the ASIL Annual Meeting (Vol. 100, pp. 79-83). Cambridge University Press.
Dammer, H. R., & Albanese, J. S. (2013). Comparative criminal justice systems. Cengage Learning.
Cyber Blackmail on Social Media and its Authenticity through Criminal Evidence
Kareem, A. F., & Wahidshihab, L. A. (2021). ELECTRONIC EXTORTION AND ITS IMPACT ON UNIVERSITY FEMALE STUDENTS. Review of International Geographical Education Online, 11(10).
Mamade, B. K., & Dabala, D. M. (2021). Exploring The Correlation between Cyber Security Awareness, Protection Measures and the State of Victimhood: The Case Study of Ambo University’s Academic Staffs. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 699-724.
Lazarus, S., & Button, M. (2022). Tweets and reactions: revealing the geographies of cybercrime perpetrators and the North-South divide. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 25(8), 504-511.
Agara, E. P., Ojong, F. E., Emeka, J. O., Agba, A. O., Akintola, A. I., & Ogunsola, O. V. (2021). Social media Platforms: Exposing students to cybercrimes. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(1), 44-54.
Ennin, D., & Mensah, R. O. (2019). Cybercrime in Ghana and the Reaction of the Law. JL Pol'y & Globalization, 84, 36.
Awoyemi, B. O., Omotayo, O. A., & Mpapalika, J. J. (2021). GLOBALIZATION AND CYBER CRIMES: A REVIEW OF FORMS AND EFFECTS OF CYBER CRIME IN NIGERIA.
Thukral, P., & Kainya, V. (2022). How social media influence crimes. Indian Journal of Law and Legal Research, 4(2), 1-11.
Ukwuoma, H. C. (2021). Cybercrime: An Emerging Threat to Economic Development in Nigeria. International Journal of Cyber Research and Education (IJCRE), 3(1), 16-27.
Mahmood, I. S. (2020). Are Cyberbullying Interventions and Criminal Law Prevention Effective?(A Review of Cyberullying Legislation in Iraq). PalArch's Journal of Archaeology of Egypt/Egyptology, 17(7), 16983-16998.
Ambika, T., & Senthilvel, K. (2020). Cyber Crimes against the State: A Study on Cyber Terrorism in India. Webology, 17(2), 65-72.
Kovács, L. (2018). National cyber security as the cornerstone of national security. Land Forces Academy Review, 23(2), 113-120.
Ijeh, A. C. (2021). Is it a Cyber Security Strategy for Social Development?. In Crime Science and Digital Forensics (pp. 202-217). CRC Press.
AbdulAmeer, S. A., Saleh, W. R., Hussam, R., Al-Hareeri, H., Alghazali, T., Mezaal, Y. S., & Saeed, I. N. (2022). Cyber Security Readiness in Iraq: Role of the Human Rights Activists. International Journal of Cyber Criminology, 16(2), 1
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v1i39.6434
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181