Ocultar
Exibir todos
Enviar artigo via e-mail 
CRITERION ASSESSMENT OF INTEGRATION POTENTIAL OF COUNTERPARTIES IN SUPPLY CHAINS
Resumo
Objective. Goal of the study is to assess the integration potential of supply chain counterparties using interrelated criteria and develop unified criteria for evaluating logistical integration potential.
Methods. The authors used methods of grouping, comparative and systematic analysis, expert assessments, questionnaires, comparison by analogy, and rating method. The methodological basis of the study is founded on the works of domestic and foreign specialists in the field of logistics integration, strategic partnership, and procurement management.
Results. Key criteria for integration potential included joint planning, information integration, and resource sharing. Approximately 21% of companies showed significant integration potential, 32% had basic conditions, 28% had minimal potential, and 19% had none. Suppliers were categorized into strategic partners, preferred suppliers, basic suppliers, and one-time contractors, with different interaction strategies for each.
Conclusions. Optimal integration levels vary by company and depend on factors such as enterprise type, industry, product specifics, and supplier relationships. While about 20% of companies can achieve high integration levels, most operate at stable or basic levels due to procurement maturity and transparency issues. Tailored integration strategies are essential for enhancing sup-ply chain partnerships and sustainability.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
Abramova, E., Protsenko, I., Kireeva, N., Terenina, I., & Khmelnitskaya, S. (2023). Research of a logistics coordination level in procurement. International Journal of Innovative Research and Scientific Studies, 6, 607-617. https://doi.org/10.53894/ijirss.v6i3.1643
Alekseev, E. V., Bogdan, V. V., Zakharova, A. N., & Dudynov, S. (2022). Regulation of environmental safety in the context of geopolitical changes. Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual, 1(34), 328-340.
Amoako-Gyampah, K., Boakye, K. G., Adaku, E., & Famiyeh, S. (2018). Supplier relationship management and firm performance in developing economies: A moderated mediation analysis of flexibility capability and ownership structure. International Journal of Production Economics, 208, 160-170. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2018.11.021
Association for Supply Chain Management [ASCM]. (2021). APICS for business. Retrieved from http://www.apics.org/apics-for-business/
Bag, S. (2018). Supplier management and sustainable innovation in supply networks: An empirical study. Global Business Review, 19(3_suppl), 176-195. https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150918760051
Bochkarev, A. (2023). [Managing the sustainability and reliability of supply chains. Moscow: Lan, 264 p.
Christopher, M., & Peck, H. (2003). Marketing logistics (2nd ed.). Oxford, UK: Butterworth-Heinemann.
Degtev, G., Shelygov, A., Lizina, O., Shichkin, I., & Kochetkov, E. (2022). Impact of globalization factors on inflation risks during COVID-19 pandemic. Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 4(37), 775–795. https://doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v4i37.6047
Deyev, A., Savelev, D., Egorova, Y., Otcheskiy, I., Badenova, L., & Kuprina, L. (2024). Public health and biopolitics strategy under the COVID-19 pandemic. Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual, 1(43), 127-152.
Dubovik, S. (2022). Purchases 100%. Experience of 350 companies in reducing prices and obtaining better conditions from difficult suppliers. St. Petersburg: Peter, 384p.
Gattorna, J. L., Ogulin, R., & Reynolds, M. W. (2017). Gower handbook of supply chain management (5th ed.). London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315253855
Heydari, J., Govindan, K., Ebrahimi Nasab, H., & Taleizadeh, A. (2020). Coordination by quantity flexibility contract in a two-echelon supply chain system: Effect of outsourcing decisions. International Journal of Production Economics, 225, 107586. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.107586
Johnson, J. C., Wood, D. F., Wardlow, D. L., & Murphy, P. R. (1999). Contemporary logistics (7th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Kim, B., Park, K. S., Jung, S.-Y., & Park, S. H. (2018). Offshoring and outsourcing in a global supply chain: Impact of the arm’s length regulation on transfer pricing. European Journal of Operational Research, 266(1), 88.
Kochetkov, E., Zhilkina, T., Zudilova, E., Philippov, D., & Popova, L. (2023). Modeling the Macroeconomic Transmission Environment: Public Sector Impact Using the Money and Financial Market Model. Relacoes Internacionais no Mundo Atual, 1(39), e06270.
Kuznetsova, I., Okagbue, H., Plisova, A., Noeva, E., Mikhailova, M., & Meshkova, G. (2020). The latest transition of manufacturing agricultural production as a result of a unique generation of human capital in new economic conditions. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 8(1), 929-944. https://doi.org/10.9770/jesi.2020.8.1(62)
Lam, M. H., & Chang, W.-Sh. (2020). The effect of information on supply chain coordination: A model of value discounting. Asia Pacific Management Review, 25(3), 134-141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apmrv.2019.06.003
Leenders, M. R., Johnson, P. F., Flynn, A. E., & Fearon, H. E. (2006). Purchasing and supply management: With 50 supply chain cases. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.
Lii, P., & Kuo, F. (2016). Innovation-oriented supply chain integration for combined competitiveness and firm performance. International Journal of Production Economics, 174, 142-155. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.01.018
Monczka, R. (1993). Global Procurement and Supply Chain Benchmarking [GPSCBI]. East Lansing, MI: Michigan State University.
Panasenko, S., Fedyunin, D., Osipova, E., Star, I., Zotova, A., & IavdolIuk, E. (2024). Features, factors, and risks of the influence of metaverses on business development in the digital economy: Russian and international context. Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual, 1(43), 397-409.
Protsenko, I. O., & Abramova, E. R. (2020). Mechanisms of logistic coordination and their role in supply chain management. Risk: Resources, Information, Supply, Competition, 1, 40-44.
Serbina, A. S. (2023). Economic instruments of the EU's political influence in Central Asia. Conflict Studies / Nota Bene, 4, 1-22. https://doi.org/10.7256/2454-0617.2023.4.68783
Sergeeva, S., Belova, N., Shichiyakh, R., Bobrova, A., Vaslavskaya, I., Bankova, N., Vetrova, E., & Hajiyev, H. (2024). Implementation of lean manufacturing principles and fast structured logic methods in the organizational culture: Addressing challenges and maximizing efficiency. International Journal of Sustainable Development and Planning, 19(3), 1195-1201. https://doi.org/10.18280/ijsdp.190337
Shugurov, M. V., & Pechatnova, Y. V. (2023). The sanctions regimes of Germany and Great Britain in the field of international scientific cooperation with the participation of Russia: The political and legal nature and consequences. International Law, 4, 1-35. https://doi.org/10.25136/2644-5514.2023.4.44106
Slone, R. E., Dittmann, J. P., & Mentzer, J. T. (2010). The new supply chain agenda: The 5 steps that drive real value. Boston, MA: Harvard Business Press.
Starovoitov, V. G., Krupnov, Y. A., & Lapenkova, N. V. (2023). Investment activity in Russian regions under sanctions and restrictions. Security Issues, 4, 1-14. https://doi.org/10.25136/2409-7543.2023.4.44135
Van Weele, A., & Van Raaij, E. M. (2014). The future of purchasing and supply management research: About relevance and rigor. Journal of Supply Chain Management, 50(1), 56-72.
Waters, D. (2003). Logistics: An introduction to supply chain management. New York, NY: Palgrave Macmillan.
Yessenali, A., Azretbergenova, G., Izatullayeva, B., Baibosynova, G., Zhetibayev, Z., Myrzaliev, B., Biryukov, V., & Shichiyakh, R. (2024). Conceptual platform and applied aspects of interaction between government and business agencies in the Republic of Kazakhstan. Journal of Infrastructure, Policy and Development, 8(5). https://doi.org/10.24294/jipd.v8i5.3396
Zhang, Q., & Cao, M. (2018). Exploring antecedents of supply chain collaboration: Effects of culture and interorganizational system appropriation. International Journal of Production Economics, 195, 146-157. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.10.014
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i45.7180
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181
