LIMINALITY AS A REFLECTION OF TRANSITIONAL POLICIES IN LITERATURE AND SOCIETY
Resumo
Background: Today, philological research with an interdisciplinary focus increasingly centers on categories characterized by paradox, peculiarity, and deviation from the norm, among which the phenomenon of liminality is of particular scholarly interest.
Objective: The aim of the study is to analyze the imagery of liminality in J.R.R. Tolkien's "The Lord of the Rings" trilogy, with a focus on liminal characters, states, time, and space.
Materials and Methods: The study employed qualitative analysis methods. Particular attention was given to key categories within the concept of liminality, such as the transition plot, liminal discourse, and liminal imagery. A component analysis of liminal elements was conducted, including architectural structures and locations, as well as the states of characters at critical moments of their transitions.
Results: The analysis revealed that the world presented in Tolkien's trilogy is in a constant state of liminality. The characters move through liminal spaces and encounter liminal characters and states, reflecting both their internal and external transformations. Architectural elements such as Moria and Minas Tirith function as symbolic liminal spaces, enhancing the significance of the events that occur. The study also focuses on key characters like Frodo and Aragorn and their transitions through liminal stages, which alter their essence and status.
Conclusion: Liminality in Tolkien's literature plays a crucial role in creating intermediate and transitional states that reflect both the internal changes of the characters and shifts in the world order. Thus, liminality in the trilogy serves as a fundamental structural and thematic element, linking various levels of the narrative and adding depth to Tolkien's literary world.
Palavras-chave
Texto completo:
PDF (English)Referências
Alber, J. (2009). Impossible storyworlds and what to do with them. Storyworlds: A Journal of Narrative Studies, 1, 79-96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/stw.0.0008
Beech, N. (2011). Liminality and the practices of identity reconstruction. Human Relations, 64(2), 315-330. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0018726710371235
Beels, C. (2007). Psychotherapy as a rite of passage. Family Process, 46(4), 421-436. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1545-5300.2007.00223.x
Brunsma, D.L., Delgado, D., & Rockquemore, K.A. (2013). Liminality in the multiracial experience: Towards a concept of identity matrix. Global Studies in Culture and Power, 20(5), 481-502. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1070289X.2013.827576
Bugayeva, L.D. (2010). Literatura i rite de passage [Literature and the rite of passage]. St. Petersburg: Petropolis.
Farino, E. (2004). Vvedenie v literaturovedenie [Introduction to literary studies]. St. Petersburg: Izdatel'stvo RGPU im. A. I. Gertsena.
Faritov, V.T. (2014). Ontologicheskii status fenomena diskursa [The ontological status of the discourse phenomenon]. Epistemologiya i filosofiya nauki, 39(1), 124-136.
Foucault, M. (1994). Slova i veshchi: Arkheologiya gumanit. nauk [The order of things: An archaeology of the human sciences]. Trans. from French. St. Petersburg: AOZT "Talisman".
Fusu, L.I. (2017). Kontseptsii liminal'nosti v nauchnom diskurse kak mezhdistsiplinarnaya problema [Concepts of liminality in scientific discourse as an interdisciplinary problem]. Kontekst i refleksiya: Filosofiya o mire i cheloveke, 6(3A), 240-246.
Fusu, L.I. (2018). Chelovek sovremennyi, to est' liminal'nyi: Sotsial'no-filosofskii analiz liminal'nosti v sovremennom sotsiume [The modern man, that is, the liminal man: A socio-philosophical analysis of liminality in contemporary society]. Noginsk: Analitika Rodis.
Gavins, J. (2013). Reading the absurd. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.
Gennep, A. van. (1960). The rites of passage. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Goldsmith, K. (2011). Uncreative writing: Managing language in the digital age. Columbia: Columbia University Press.
Grebenyuk, E.G. (2016). Ritual perekhoda i psikhoterapiya [The rite of passage and psychotherapy]. Counseling Psychology and Psychotherapy, 24(1), 97-108. https://doi.org/10.17759/cpp.2016240107
Jaccard, J. (2011). Literatura napokaz: Ot modernizma k klassikam [Literature on display: From modernism to the classics]. In Literatura kak takovaya. Ot Nabokova k Pushkinu: Izbrannye raboty o russkoy slovesnosti (pp. 11-36). Trans. by A. Popova. Moscow: Novoye literaturnoye obozreniye.
Katernyi, I.V. (2020). Rekontseptualizatsiya statusnoi liminal'nosti v sotsiologicheskoi teorii [Reconceptualization of status liminality in sociological theory]. Vestnik RUDN. Seriya: Sotsiologiya, 20(2), 226-238. https://doi.org/10.22363/2313-2272-2020-20-2-226-238
Lisina, E.A. (2011). K voprosu o mekhanizmakh perekhoda: Sotsial'no-filosofskii aspect [On the mechanisms of transition: A socio-philosophical aspect]. Vestnik Orenburgskogo gosudarstvennogo universiteta, 7, 115-120.
Maksimova, O.L. (2016). Smysl i naznachenie cheloveka v kontekste idei limitizma K. Zhakova [The understanding and the destination of man in the K.F. Zhakov’s limitism phIlosophy]. Vestnik Syktyvkarskogo universiteta, 5, 40-48.
Neumann, I. (2012). Introduction to the forum on liminality. Review of International Studies, 38(2), 470-492. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0260210511000817
Perloff, M. (2012). Unoriginal genius: Poetry by other means in the new century. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Ponomarenko, O.V. (2014). Ponyatie liminal'nosti v lingvofilosofskoi determitatsii diplomaticheskogo diskursa [The notion of liminality in the linguophilosophical determination of the diplomatic discourse]. Universum: Filologiya i iskusstvovedenie, 12(14), 5.
Riatiani, I. (2008). Teoriya liminal'nosti: Problema antropologii i sovremennogo literaturovedeniya [Theory of liminality: The problem of anthropology and contemporary literary studies]. In Literatura v dialoge kul'tur (pp. 195-199). Rostov-on-Don: Logos.
Sapogova, E.E. (2009). Preodolenie liminal'nosti kak sposob lichnostnogo zhiznetvorchestva [Overcoming liminality as a way of personal life-creativity]. Kul'turno-istoricheskaya psikhologiya, 5(1), 49-56.
Savelova, L.V. (2012). Liminal'nyi narrativ v sovremennoi russkoi proze: Model' i struktura [Liminal narrative in contemporary Russian prose: Model and structure]. In Russkii sled v narratologii: Materialy Mezhdunarodnoy nauchno-prakticheskoy konferentsii (pp. 141-149). Balashov: Nikolaev.
Shchukina, M.A. (2017). Stadiya liminal'nosti v samorazvitii lichnosti [The stage of liminality in personal self-development]. Uchenye zapiski SPbGIPSR, 27(1), 45-51.
Smorgunov, L.V. (2012). Politicheskoe "mezhdu": Fenomen liminal'nosti v sovremennoi politike [The political "in-between": The phenomenon of liminality in contemporary politics]. Polis. Politicheskie issledovaniya, 5, 159-169.
Sorokin, P.A. (2006). Sotsial'naya i kul'turnaya dinamika [Social and cultural dynamics]. Trans. from English by V.V. Sapov. Moscow: Astrel'.
Stockwell, P. (2017). The language of surrealism. London: Palgrave.
Szakolczai, A. (2009). Liminality and experience: Structuring transitory situations and transformative events. International Political Anthropology, 2(1), 141-172.
Thomassen, B. (2014). Liminality and the modern. Living through the in-between. Surrey: Ashgate Publishing, Ltd.
Treshchenok, Yu.M. (2016). "Obryady perekhoda" Arnolda van Gennepa, ego teoriya i metod ["The rites of passage" by Arnold van Gennep, his theory and method]. Istoricheskie, filosofskie, politicheskie i yuridicheskie nauki, kul'turologiya i iskusstvovedenie. Voprosy teorii i praktiki, 12-2(74), 179-182.
Turner, V. (1983). Ritual'nyi protsess. Struktura i antistruktura. Simvol i ritual [The ritual process: Structure and anti-structure. Symbol and ritual]. Moscow: Nauka.
Znamen'skaya, A.P. (2021). Liminal'nost' v prostranstve chelovecheskogo bytiya [Liminality in the space of human existence]. Psikhologiya i pedagogika v Krymu, 1, 63-74.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v3i45.7488
Apontamentos
- Não há apontamentos.
Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880
Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181