IMPACT OF MACROECONOMIC AND FINANCIAL FACTORS ON THE MANAGEMENT OF SCIENCE-INTENSIVE ENTERPRISES IN RUSSIA

Mikhail Sergeevich Abrashkin, Victoria Evgenievna Barkovskaya

Resumo


Objective: The study aims at substantiating new approaches to the management of science-intensive enterprises of rocket and space engineering through analyzing the existing problems and global challenges to their development. Methods: To achieve this objective, the authors used a wide range of methodological tools, including systemic and comparative analysis, modeling, economic and statistical methods of group comparison. The study comprised the economic analysis of 62 rocket and space engineering enterprises in the Russian Federation. Results: According to the study results, the current economy and economic relations make science-intensive enterprises of rocket and space engineering adapt to global growth trends and search for effective management solutions under the conditions of a state monopoly on their structuring, technological inflation, low capitalization and an increase in returns from R&D through the systemic integration and accumulation of innovations in production.


Palavras-chave


Development management; Rocket and space engineering; Science-intensive enterprises

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Batkovskii, A.M., Batkovskii, M.A., & Kravchuk, P.V. (2020). Ekonomicheskaya effektivnost vnedreniya rezultatov NIOKR v innovatsionno-aktivnoi otrasli promyshlennosti [The economic efficiency of implementing R&D results in the innovative activity of indusrtries]. Aktualnye voprosy sovremennoi ekonomiki, 1, 375-385.

Batkovskii, A.M., Efimova, N.S., Khrustalev, E.Yu., & Kalachanov, V.D. (2019). Razvitie instrumentariya otsenki proizvodstva v naukoemkikh otraslyakh promyshlennosti [The development of tools for assessing production rates in science-intensive industries]. Innovatsii v menedzhmente, 1, 4-11.

Brand, U., Görg, C., & Wissen, M. (2020). Overcoming neoliberal globalization: Social-ecological transformation from a Polanyian perspective and beyond. Globalizations, 17(1), 161-176. https://doi.org/10.1080/14747731.2019.1644708

Brugger, H., Eichhammer, W., Mikova, N., & Dönitz, E. (2021). Energy efficiency vision 2050: How will new societal trends influence future energy demand in the European countries? Energy Policy, 152, 112216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2021.112216

Crawford, I.A. (2016). The long-term scientific benefits of a space economy. Space Policy, 37, 58–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spacepol.2016.07.003

Gorlacheva, E.N., & Ivannikova, E.M. (2019). Metodologiya upravleniya kognitivnymi faktorami proizvodstva vysokotekhnologichnykh predpriyatii [Methods for managing cognitive factors of high-tech production]. Ekonomika nauki, 3, 203-214.

Harrington, A. (2020). Insurance as governance for outer space activities. Astropolitics, 18(2), 99-121. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2020.1786300

Hrubec, M., & Uhde, Z. (2019). Global conflicts and local interactions: Contradictions of global capitalism and civil society. Critical Sociology, 45(6), 777-783. https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920518798880

Lugo-Morin, D.R. (2021). Global future: Low-carbon economy or high-carbon economy? World, 2(2), 175-193. https://doi.org/10.3390/world2020012

Makarenko, N.O. (2017). Sovremennye problemy predpriyatii raketno-kosmicheskoi promyshlennosti i puti ikh resheniya [Modern challenges to rocket and space engineering enterprises and their possible solutions]. Novaya nauka: Opyt, traditsii, innovatsii, 10, 170-173.

McCausland, T. (2021). News and analysis of the global innovation scene. Research Technology Management, 64(6), 2-8. https://doi.org/10.1080/08956308.2021.1972388

Murray, A., Skene, K., & Haynes, K. (2017). The circular economy: An interdisciplinary exploration of the concept and application in a global context. Journal of Business Ethics, 140(3), 369-380. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-015-2693-2

Patsuk, E.B., & Korshakevich, I.S. (2017). Problemy i perspektivy razvitiya raketno-kosmicheskoi otrasli [The issues and prospects of developing rocket and space engineering]. Aktualnye problemy aviatsii i kosmonavtiki, 13, 392-394.

Payson, D., & Davidian, K. (2015). Transition of the Russian rocket and space industry. New Space, 3(1), 59-67. https://doi.org/10.1089/space.2014.0028

Payson, D.B., & Frolov, I.E. (2020). Multi-level structure of the international space market and analysis of labor productivity in the rocket and space industry. Cosmic Research, 58(3), 218-226. https://doi.org/10.1134/S0010952520030053

Pollpeter, K. (2011). Upward and onward: Technological innovation and organizational change in China’s space industry. Journal of Strategic Studies, 34(3), 405-423. https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.574983

Sagath, D., Vasko, C., van Burg, E., & Giannopapa, C. (2019). Development of national space governance and policy trends in member states of the European Space Agency. Acta Astronautica, 165, 43-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2019.07.023

Schaffer, L.M., & Spilker, G. (2019). Self-interest versus sociotropic considerations: an information-based perspective to understanding individuals’ trade preferences. Review of International Political Economy, 26(6), 1266-1292. https://doi.org/10.1080/09692290.2019.1642232

Shiryaeva, A.R., & Rozhanskaia, E.A. (2020). The prospects of the Russian rocket and space industry products in the world market. International Trade and Trade Policy, 2, 88-102. https://doi.org/10.21686/2410-7395-2020-2-88-102

Szunomár, Á. (2020). The digital great leap forward mapping China’s 21st century attempt to create a new growth model. Acta Oeconomica, 70(S), 95-115. https://doi.org/10.1556/032.2020.00028

Tsisarskii, A.D. (2014). Otsenka rezultativnosti i effektivnosti NIOKR na vysokotekhnologichnykh predpriyatiyakh RKP [Assessing the effectiveness of R&D in high-tech rocket and space engineering enterprises]. Kontrolling, 54, 20-25.

van Burg, E., Giannopapa, C., & Reymen, I. M.M.J. (2017). Open innovation in the European space sector: Existing practices, constraints and opportunities. Acta Astronautica, 141, 17-21. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.actaastro.2017.09.019

Wang, Y., Ma, H.S., Yang, J.H., & Wang, K.S. (2017). Industry 4.0: A way from mass customization to mass personalization production. Advances in Manufacturing, 5(4), 311-320. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40436-017-0204-7

Weigend Rodríguez, R., Pomponi, F., Webster, K., & D’Amico, B. (2020). The future of the circular economy and the circular economy of the future. Built Environment Project and Asset Management, 10(4), 529–546. https://doi.org/10.1108/BEPAM-07-2019-0063

Weinzierl, M. (2018). Space, the final economic frontier. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 32(2), 173-192. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.32.2.173

Wortman, R. (2020). Research viewpoint modernizing the outer space treaty for national appropriation. Astropolitics, 18(2), 170-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/14777622.2020.1789276

Xiong, A., Xia, S., Ye, Z. P., Cao, D., Jing, Y., & Li, H. (2020). Can innovation really bring economic growth? The role of social filter in China. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 53, 50–61. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2020.01.003

Yazıcı, A., & Darıcı, S. (2019). The new opportunities in space economy. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 8(4), 3252-3271.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v6i39.6084

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.


Bookmark and Share


Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880

Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181

Licença Creative Commons

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.