SOCIAL STATUS OF LIBERAL OPPOSITION IN MODERN RUSSIA (BASED ON PUBLICATIONS OF REPRESENTATIVES OF POLITICAL PARTY “YABLOKO”)

Maxim Kozyrev, Andrey Anisin, Svetlana Anisina, Alexander Shumarov, Polina Palekhova

Resumo


Objective: The scientific purpose of this article is to define the social status and milieu of liberal opposition represented by the political party “Yabloko”. Methods: The research focuses on interrelation of social reality and ideology. The latter is considered not only as a justification for short-term interests by certain social groups (private ideology), but also as a reflection of their social status (total ideology). The novelty of the article is that social status and milieu as well as the perspectives of the transformation of anti-elite groups of liberal opposition were defined by this method. Moreover, the usage of this method for the specified purposes is uncommon in Russian science. Results: Certain elements of self-positioning of the liberal legal elite, its social status and environment, attitude to the socio-economic formation existing in modern Russia, as well as a number of other aspects of the social structure in the Russian Federation are determined in the article. In particular, it is found that “Yabloko” is not a mouthpiece for the big national bourgeoisie and the defender of its interests. It is more likely that the party represents the interests of social groups with relatively high economic, cultural, qualification and symbolic capitals; these social groups advocate for a change in the existing social order, but the sudden change will not favor them (this position can be called moderately reformist). Conclusion: Their asociality, isolation and lack of contacts with other social groups, despite significant political activity of some representatives of the party, prevents them from receiving widespread support from potential voters.


Palavras-chave


Ideology; Liberal opposition of contemporary Russia; Social status; Social conceptions.

Texto completo:

PDF (English)

Referências


Bourdieu, P. (2007) Sotsiologiya sotsial'nogo prostranstva [Sociology of social space]. Moscow: Institut eksperimental'noy sotsiologii; St. Petersburg: Aleteyya.

Dorey, P. (2013). Neo-liberal ideology: History, concepts and policies. Public administration, 91(1), 236-237.

Kogan-Yasnyy, V. (2016). Chastnoye mneniye o Rossii – V trudnom poiske smysla [Private opinion about Russia - In a difficult search for meaning]. Moscow: RODP “Yabloko”. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/kogan_mnenie_2016_web.pdf

Kosmynin, A., Rybakov, N., Fishman, A., & Yakovlev, I. (2018). Glavnoye. Osnovnyye publikatsii Grigoriya Yavlinskogo v 2017-2018 godakh [The main thing. The main publications of Grigory Yavlinsky in 2017-2018]. Moscow: RODP “Yabloko”. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/GLAVNOE_2018_web.pdf

Kozyrev, M. (2014). Issledovaniye vliyaniya sotsial'no-klassovoy struktury na ideologiyu v rabotakh Karla Manngeyma [Study of the influence of social-class structure on ideology in the works of Karl Mannheim]. Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya, 4(105), 150-162.

Kozyrev, M. (2015). Vliyaniye sotsial'noy struktury na ideologiyu v rabotakh R. Mertona [The influence of social structure on ideology in the works of R. Merton]. Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya, 4(111), 141-148.

Kozyrev, M. (2017). Sotsial'noye okruzheniye sovremennoy rossiyskoy pravyashchey elity (po materialam publikatsiy predstaviteley politicheskoy partii "Yedinaya Rossiya") [The social environment of the modern Russian ruling elite (based on publications by representatives of the political party "United Russia")]. Vestnik Permskogo universiteta. Filosofiya. Psikhologiya. Sotsiologiya, 4(32), 622-631.

Kozyrev, M. (2019). Sotsial'noye polozheniye "levoy" kontrelity v sovremennoy Rossii (na materialakh publikatsiy predstaviteley Kommunisticheskoy partii Rossiyskoy Federatsii) [The social position of the "left" counter-elite in modern Russia (based on publications by representatives of the Communist Party of the Russian Federation)]. Sotsial'naya politika i sotsiologiya, 1(130), 157-165.

Kozyrev, M., Medvedeva, N., Maslikov, V., Frolovà, E., & Beljakov, B. (2016). The influence of the social structure on ideology in the works by R. K. Merton. Man in India, 95(10), 3581-3590.

Mannheim, K. (1929). Ideologie und Utopie. Bonn: Verlag von Friedrich Cochen in Bonn.

Mannheim, K. (1943). Diagnosis of our time: Wartime essays of a sociologist. London: Kegan Paul, Trench, Trubner.

Mikhaleva, G.M. (Ed.). (2014). O Yevropeyskom puti Rossii [About the European way of Russia]. Moscow: RODP “Yabloko”. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/book_yavl_alternative_web_0.pdf

Mikhaleva, G.M. (Ed.). (2015). Liberal'nyye tsennosti i konservativnyy trend v yevropeyskoy politike i obshchestve [Liberal values and a conservative trend in European politics and society]. Moscow: RODP “Yabloko”. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/alde_prew.pdf

Mikhaleva, G.M., & Sheinis, V.L. (Eds.). (2014). Istoricheskoye znaniye kak faktor razvitiya [Historical knowledge as a factor of development]. Moscow: RODP “Yabloko”. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/iz-book-pdf_0.pdf

Rempala, D., Okdie, B., & Garvey, K. (2016). Articulating ideology: How liberals and conservatives justify political affiliations using morality-based explanations. Motivation and Emotion, 40(5), 703-719.

Rochlitz, M., Mitrokhina, E., & Nizovkina, I. (2021). Bureaucratic discrimination in electoral authoritarian regimes: Experimental evidence from Russia. European Journal of Political Economy, 66, 101957. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2020.101957

Schoonvelde, M., Brosius, A., Schumacher, G., & Bakker, B. (2019). Liberals lecture, conservatives communicate: Analyzing complexity and ideology in 381,609 political speeches. PlOs One, 14(2), e0208450. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208450

Schwirtz, M. (2007). Russia's political youths. Demokratizatsiya, 15(1), 73-84.

Sembou, E. (2013). Neo-liberal Ideology: History, concepts and policies. Political Studies Review, 11(2), 247-248.

Shishmanova, P.D. (2020). A comparative analysis of the main characteristics of human capital in Bulgaria and Russia. Russian Technological Journal, 8(4), 141-151. https://doi.org/10.32362/2500-316X-2020-8-4-141-151

Smith, G. (2013). System of liberty: Themes in the history of classical liberalism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Smith, J. (2014). Between ideology and pragmatism: Liberal party politics at the European level. Acta politica, 49(1), 105-121.

Van De Haar, E. (2015). Degrees of freedom: Liberal political philosophy and ideology. Oxford: Routledge.

Vishnevskiy, B. (2018). Nevostorzhennyy obraz mysley. Stat'i, vystupleniya, interv'yu 2015-2018 godov [An unrestrained way of thinking. Articles, speeches, interviews 2015-2018]. Moscow: RODP “Yabloko”. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/невосторженный%20образ%20мыслей.pdf

Weiss, M. (2013). Rights in Russia: Navalny and the opposition. World Affairs, 176(4), 72-80.

White, D. (2006). Going their own way: The Yabloko Party's opposition to unification. Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics, 21(4), 462-486.

White, D. (2013). Russian liberalism in crisis? Khodorkovsky revisited. Studies of Transition States and Societies, 5(1), 69-84.

White, D. (2018). The Russian democratic party Yabloko: Opposition in a managed democracy (1st ed.) London: Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781351145442

Yavlinskiy, G. (2017). Poterya budushchego. Vremya trevog i peremen [Loss of the future. Time of anxiety and change]. Retrieved from https://www.yabloko.ru/files/poterya_web.pdf




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.21902/Revrima.v5i38.6052

Apontamentos

  • Não há apontamentos.




Revista Relações Internacionais do Mundo Atual e-ISSN: 2316-2880

Rua Chile, 1678, Rebouças, Curitiba/PR (Brasil). CEP 80.220-181

Licença Creative Commons

Este obra está licenciado com uma Licença Creative Commons Atribuição-NãoComercial 4.0 Internacional.